The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지

The marginal fidelity of $Procera^{(R)}$ AllCeram alumina copings and crowns of patients

$Procera^{(R)}$ AllCeram 을 이용한 도재관의 임상적 변연적합도에 관한 연구

  • Song, Young-Gyun (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Cho, In-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Lee, Jong-Hyuk (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 송영균 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 조인호 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 이종혁 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Published : 2008.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Statement of problem: Use of all-ceramic prostheses fabricated with CAD/CAM systems is increasing in the dentistry. Marginal fidelity in production of all-ceramic restoration has important clinical implications and is a key consideration issue in CAD/CAM production as well. Purpose: The objective of this study was to analyse marginal fidelities of $Procera^{(R)}$ Allceram Crown. Material and methods: On 56 patients treated with $Procera^{(R)}$ system Allceram Crown at Dankook Dental Hospital, marginal discrepancies of 101 abutments were measured by stereomicroscope at coping and final restoration stages. Paired t-test and one-way analysis of variance on marginal discrepancy data were conducted to determine the presence of significant differences between measurement and measuring point stages. Results: Marginal discrepancies of final restoration ($45.82{\pm}30.84\;{\mu}m$) were lower than alumina coping ($53.84{\pm}38.83\;{\mu}m$). Furthermore, the differences were found to be statistically significant at 95% confidence level. Anterior marginal discrepancies were lower than posterior marginal discrepancies, but they were not statistically significant. Lingual marginal discrepancies were higher than other measurement sites, and the differences were found to be statistically significant at 95% confidence level. Conclusion: Within the conditions of this study, marginal fidelities of $Procera^{(R)}$ Allceram Crown were acceptable, and after porcelain build-up, marginal fitness improved over alumina coping. More careful scanning is needed for better results.

완전도재 수복물은 뛰어난 심미성을 가지고 있어, 환자들의 심미적 욕구를 충족시킬 수 있다. 이러한 도재관을 제작함에 있어 CAD/CAM 시스템을 이용하는 것은 시간과 비용을 절약할 수 있는 장점을 가지고 있으며, 정밀도 또한 점차 높아지고 있다. 특히 변연적합도는 수복물의 성공 여부에 중요한 요소이고, 이 분야에 대한 실험적 연구는 많이 보고되고 있으나 임상적인 연구는 아직 미흡한 실정이다. 본 연구에서는 CAD/CAM 시스템의 하나인 $Procera^{(R)}$ AllCeram 시스템의 변연적합도를 실제 환자의 수복물 상에서 측정함으로써 임상에 사용되는 CAD/CAM 시스템의 변연적합도를 연구하고자 하였다. 단국대학교 치과병원 보철과에 내원한 56명, 101개의 지대치에 대해 코핑 상태와 최종수복물의 변연오차를 입체광학현미경으로 측정하고 비교분석하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 실험 결과, 코핑의 변연오차 ($53.84{\pm}38.83\;{\mu}m$)보다 최종 수복물에서의 변연오차 ($45.82{\pm}30.84\;{\mu}m$)가 더 낮은 값을 나타났으며, 이는 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 있었다 (P < .05). 각 측정 지점간 비교에서 역시 모든 변연에서 코핑 의 변연오차가 최종 수복물에서의 변연오차보다 더 높은 값을 나타냈으며, 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 있었다 (P < .05). 구치부의 변연오차는 전치부의 변연오차보다 더 높은 값을 나타냈으나, 통계적으로 유의한 차이는 없었다. 설측 변연의 경우, 근심, 원심, 순측 변연의 오차보다 더 높은 값을 나타냈으며, 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 있었다 (P < .05). 이상의 결과로 보아 $Procera^{(R)}$ 시스템의 Allceram 관의 변연적합도는 임상적 허용 범위 내에 있었으며, 특히 도재 축성후 변연적합도 는 더 우수해지는 것으로 나타났으며, 각 변연 중 설측 변연의 오차가 가장 큰 것은 주모형의 정보 입력시 순측 부위의 특성상 일어나는 오류로 사료된다. $Procera^{(R)}$ 시스템 Allceram 관 수복시 설측 변연에 더욱 주의를 기울이는 것이 좋은 변연적합을 얻는 데 도움이 될 것으로 사료되며, 앞으로 주모형 변연 부위의 변곡 정도에 따른 변연오차에 대한 연구가 필요할 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Godacre CJ, Campagni WV, Aquilino SA. Tooth preparations for complete crowns: An art form based on scientific principles. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:363-76 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.114685
  2. Brecker SC. Porcelain baked to gold; a new medium in prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1956;6:801-10 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(56)90077-4
  3. Goodacre CJ, Van Roekel NB, Dykema RW, Ullmann RB. The collarless metal-ceramic crown. J Prosthet Dent 1977;38:615-22 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(77)90004-X
  4. Lehner CR, Mannchen R, Scharer P. Variable reduced metal support for collarless metal ceramic crowns : A new model for strength evaluation. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:337-45
  5. Mclean JW, Jeansonne EE, Bruggers H, Lynn DB. A new metal-ceramic crown. J Prosthet Dent 1978; 40:273-87 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(78)90032-X
  6. Rizkalla AS, Jones DW. Mechanical properties of commercial high strength ceramic core materials. Dent Mater 2004;20:207-12 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00093-9
  7. Campbell SD, Pelletier LB, Pober RL, Giordano RA. Dimensional and formation analysis of a restorative ceramic and how it works. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:332-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80370-1
  8. Sturdevant JR, Bayne SC, Heymann HO. Margin gap size of ceramic in-lays using second-generation CAD/CAM equipment. J Esthet Dent 1999;11:206-14 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1999.tb00400.x
  9. Besimo C, Jeger C, Guggenheim R. Marginal adaptation of titanium frameworks produced by CAD/CAM techniques. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:541-6
  10. Denissen HW, Van der Zel JM, Van Waas MAJ. Measurement of the margins of partial-coverage tooth preparation for CAD/CAM. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:395-400
  11. Rekow ED. High-technology innovations and limitations for restorative dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 1993;37:513-24
  12. Persson M, Andersson M, Bergman B. The accuracy of a high-precision digitizer for CAD/CAM of crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:223-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80127-1
  13. Kim IS, Kang DW. Marginal adaptation of the conical inner crown fabrication with CAD/CAM. J Kor Acad Prosthodont 2002;40:30-41
  14. Van Roekel NB. Electrical discharge machining in Dentistry. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5:114-21
  15. Valderrama S, Van Roekel N, Andersson M, Goodacre CJ, Munoz CA. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of titanium and gold-platinum-palladium metal ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:29- 37
  16. Gardener FM. Margins of complete crowns-literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:396-400 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(82)90072-5
  17. Sulaiman F, Chai J, Jameson LM, Wozniak WT. A comparison of marginal fit of In-ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera Crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:478-84
  18. Denissen H, Dozic A, Van der Zel J, van Waas M. Marginal fit and short-term clinical performance of porcelain-veneered CICERO, CEREC, and Procera onlays. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:506-13 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.110258
  19. Kim DK, Cho IH, Lim JH, Lim HS. On the marginal fidelity of all-ceramic core using CAD/CAM system. J Kor Acad Prosthodont 2003;41:20-34
  20. Shin SY. Procera system: a review of literature. J Kor Acad Stomatog Func Occ 2006;22:309-15
  21. Andersson M, Razzoog ME, Oden A, Hegenbarth EA, Lang BR. Procera: a new way to achieve an all-ceramic crown. Quintessence Int 1998;29:285-96
  22. Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:405-8
  23. Kydd WL, Nicholls JI, Harrington G, Freeman M. Marginal leakage of cast gold crowns luted with zinc phosphate cement: an in vivo study. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:9-13 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90411-4
  24. Christensen GJ. Marginal fit of gold inlay casting. J Prosthet Dent 1996;13:297-305
  25. Jenkins CB, Phillips RW. An evaluation of five inlay investing techniques employed with different types of wax patterns. J Prosthet Dent 1971;25:211-20 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(71)90110-7
  26. Mclean JW. Polycarboxylate cements. Five years'experience in general practice. Br Dent J 1972;132:9-15 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802795
  27. Andersson M, Carlsson L, Persson M, Bergman B. Accuracy of machine milling and spark erosion with a CAD/CAM system. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:187-93 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90305-4
  28. Mormann WH, Schug J. Grinding precision and accuracy of fit of CEREC2 CAD-CAM inlays. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128:47-53 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1997.0025
  29. Bindl A, Windisch S, Mormann WH. Full-ceramic CAD/CIM anterior crowns and copings. Int J Comput Dent 1999;2:97-111
  30. Persson M, Andersson M, Bergman B. The accuracy of a high-precision digitizer for CAD/CAM of Crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:223-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80127-1
  31. Small BW. Product review: all-ceramic system. Gen Dent 1998;46:446-50