Applicability of the Real Option Valuation Method to the Economic Analysis of Water Resources Supply Projects

수자원 공급 사업의 경제성 평가: 실물옵션가치평가기법의 적용성 검토

  • Yu, Soon-Young (University of Waterloo, 200 University Aveneu West) ;
  • Unger, Andre J.A. (University of Waterloo, 200 University Aveneu West) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Hee (Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources)
  • Published : 2008.10.28

Abstract

Option pricing model in finance has been applied to price non-financial options, called real options. The real option valuation method is ideally suited to irreversible decision making under uncertainty, including the need to determine the optimal time to act and even change between alternative courses of action as information is collected. Therefore, the real option valuation method is expected to provide a superior and less subjective approach to determining optimal strategies for water resources supply projects, which have been reported to have huge risks due to uncertainties, and investors and policy makers need to build an optimal strategy - when and if to invest - with uncertainties and managerial flexibilities considered.

금융시장에서 옵션과 같은 파생상품의 가격 결정에 이용되는 옵션가격결정모델의 기본개념이 비금융 사업의 옵션가치 평가에 이용되고 있다. 본 논문에서는 실물옵션이라 불리는 이들 비금융 사업 옵션의 특성을 살펴보고, 실물옵션가치평가기법이 수자원 공급 사업의 경제성 평가에 이용되는 방안을 검토해 보고자 하였다. 수자원 공급 사업이 일반적으로 대규모 투자비용이 소요되고, 사업 기간이 긴 이유로 말미암아 경영상의 유연성이 요구되며, 미래의 수익과 비용 흐름이 불확실하다는 것을 고려할 때, 실물옵션가치평가기법은 운영 옵션의 가치를 평가하고, 이를 수자원 공급 사업의 가치 평가 과정에 포함시키므로써, 기존 현금흐름할인법의 단점을 보안할 수 있는 경제적 가치 평가 기법으로 이용될 수 있을 것으로 보인다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bickerton, G.S. (2001) Optimal decision analysis for investments in municipal water-service infrastructure. Master's Thesis, University of Waterloo
  2. Black, F. and Sholes, M. (1973) The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, v. 81, p. 637-654 https://doi.org/10.1086/260062
  3. Brennan, M.J. and Schwartz, E.S. (1985) Evaluating natural resource investments. Journal of business, v. 58, p. 135-157 https://doi.org/10.1086/296288
  4. Chernov, M. and Ghysels, E. (1999) Estimation of stochastic volatility models for the purpose of option pricing. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computational Finance, Leonard N. Stem School of Business, January 6-8, 1999
  5. Cho, S. and Heo, E. (2005) Real options valuation method for new and renewable energies: an empirical study of wind power. Proceedings of the Korean Society for New and Renewable Energy Conference, p. 604
  6. Choi, S.M. (2002) Try to Use a New Valuation Approach: Application of the Real Options Pricing Method to an Aerospace Project. Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference, p. 181-198
  7. Cortazar, G., Gravet, M., and Urzua, J. (2008) The valuation of multidimensional American real options using the LSM simulation method. Computers & operations research, v. 35, p. 113-129 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2006.02.016
  8. Cortazar, G., Schwartz, E., and Salinas, M. (1998) Evaluating Environmental Investments: A Real Options Approach. Management science, v. 44, p. 1059-1070 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.8.1059
  9. Costa Lima, G.A. and Suslick, S.B. (2006) Estimation of volatility of selected oil production projects. Journal of petroleum science & engineering, v. 54, p. 129-139 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2006.07.005
  10. Cvitanic, J. and Zapatero, F. (2004) Economics and Mathematics of Financial Markets.The MIT Press, London, p. 228-235
  11. Dimitrakopoulos, R.G. and Abdel Sabour, S.A. (2007) Evaluating mine plans under uncertainty: Can the real options make a difference?. Resources policy, v. 32, p. 116-125 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2007.06.003
  12. Dixit, A.K. and Pindyck, R.S. (1994) Investment under Uncertainty. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, p. 93-132
  13. Forsyth, M. (2000) On estimating the Option Value of Preserving a Wilderness Area. Canadian Journal of Economics, v. 33, p. 413-434 https://doi.org/10.1111/0008-4085.00022
  14. Forsyth, P.A. and Vetzal, K.R. (2002) Quadratic convergence of a penalty method for valuating American options. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computation, v. 23, p. 2096-2123
  15. Heo, E. (2000) Recent Developments on Economic Valuation Method - CVM, MAUA and Real Option Pricing. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, v. 3, p. 37-54
  16. Insley, M. (2002) A Real Options Approach to the Valuation of a Forestry Investment. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. v. 44, p. 471-492 https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.2001.1209
  17. Insley, M. (2003) On the option to invest in pollution control under a regime of tradable emissions allowances. Canadian Journal of Economics, v. 35, p. 860-883
  18. Insley, M. and Wirjanto, T. (2008) Contrasting two approaches in real options valuations: contingent claims versus dynamic programming. discussion paper, University of Waterloo, http://www.arts.uwaterloo.ca/-minsley/cclaims.pdf
  19. Isik, M. (2004) Incentives for Technology Adoption Under Environmental Policy Uncertainty: Implications for Green Payment Programs. Environmental & resource economics, v.27, p.247-263 https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EARE.0000017624.07757.3f
  20. Jeon, I.H., Lee, J.D., and Jeong, J.W. (2005) Evaluation of Withdrawing and Reallocating the Existing Ananog Radio Broadcasting Spectrum by Using Real Option Valuation Method. Proceeding of the Korean Society for Innovation Management and Economics Conference, p. 124-139
  21. Kjaerland, F. (2007) A real option analysis of investments in hydropower-The case of Norway. Energy policy, v. 35, p. 5901-5908 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.07.021
  22. Lee, I.-S. and Heo, E. (2004) An Option Pricing Model for the Natural Resource Development Projects. Environmental and Resource Economics Review, v. 13, p. 735-761
  23. Lee, J.-D. (2005) The Application of Real Options Theory in Defense Offset Contract. Journal of Military Operations Research Society of Korea, v. 31, p. 14-25
  24. Lentz, G.H. and Maurice Tse, K.S. (1995) An Option Pricing Approach to the Valuation of Real Estate Contaminated with Hazardous Materials. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, v. 10, p. 121-144 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01096985
  25. Marreco, J.d.M. and Carpio, L.G.T. (2006) Flexibility valuation in the Brazilian power system: A real options approach. Energy policy, v. 34, p. 3749-3756 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.08.020
  26. Michailidis, A. and Mattas, K. (2007) Using Real Options Theory to Irrigation Dam Investment Analysis: An Application of Binomial Option Pricing Model. Water resources management, v. 21, p. 1717-1733 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9122-3
  27. Murillas, A. and Chamorro, J.M. (2006) Valuation and Management of Fishing Resources Under Price Uncertainty. Environmental & resource economics, v. 33, p. 39-71 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-0591-2
  28. Park, H. (2004) A Real Option Approach to Optimal Use of Natural Resource: Revisiting the Least Cost Principle. Korean Energy Economic Review, v. 3, p. 47-69
  29. Park, H. (2005) Real Options on Firms' Environmental Investment in the Presence of Uncertainty on Tradable Emission Permit Price. Korean Economic Review, v. 53, p. 173-199
  30. Park, H. and Hwang, E.-S. (2003) Real option analysis for irreversible investment effect of farmland preservation programs. Journal of Agricultural Economics, v. 44, p. 121-139
  31. Park, J.M. and Seol, S.S. (2006) A Comparative Study on the Real Options Valuation of Biotechnology R&D. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, v. 9, p. 84-102
  32. Seo, S., Segarra, E., and Mitchell, P.D. (2008) Irrigation technology adoption and its implication for water conservation in the Texas High Plains: a real options approach. Agricultural economics, v. 38, p. 47-55 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2007.00280.x
  33. Seo, S. and W.S. (2007) Analysis of entry and exit thresholds for apple production: a real options approach. Journal of Agricultural Economics, v. 48, p. 93-113 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1997.tb01134.x
  34. Seo, S.-T. (2006) A real options approach to the investment analysis of irrigation systems. Journal of Agricultural Economics, v. 47, p. 31-50
  35. Seol, S.S. and Yoo, C.S. (2002) Real Options for Practitioners on the Valuation of Technology and Investment. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, v. 5, p. 44-58
  36. Sung, O.-H. (2002) Valuation of Two-Stage Technology Investment Using Double Real Option. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, v. 5, p. 141-151
  37. Sung, O.-H. (2004) A study on Real option valuation for technology investment using the Monte Carlo simulation. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, v. 7, p. 533-554
  38. Sung, O.-H. (2005) A Study on Interval Estimation of Technology R&D Investment Value using Black-Scholes Model. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, v. 8, p. 29-50
  39. Sunnevag, K. (1998) An option pricing approach to exploration licensing strategy. Resources policy, v. 24, p. 25-38 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4207(98)00005-1
  40. Wang, T. and de Neufville, R. (2004) Building real options into physical systems with stochastic mixed-integer programming. 8th Real Options Annual International Conference, Montreal, Canada, June 2004
  41. Yang, M. and Blyth, W. (2007) Modeling Investment Risks and Uncertainties with Real Options Approach - A Working Paper for an IEA Book: Climate Policy Uncertainty and Investment Risk
  42. Yu, S.-H. and Sung, W.-H. (2005) Real Option and Analysis of R&D Projects. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information, 2005-12
  43. Yun, W.-C. (2001) Evaluation of Capital Investment in Energy-related Business by using Real Option Rricing Method. Korea Energy Economics Institute. 2001-06