Reproductive and Developmental Biology

  • 제32권3호
  • /
  • Pages.175-181
  • /
  • 2008
  • /
  • 1738-2432(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-0151(eISSN)
한국동물번식학회 (The Korean Society of Animal Reproduction)
권호 표지

Effects of Recipient Oocyte and Embryo Culture System on Production of Hanwoo (Korean Native Cattle) Somatic Cell Nuclear Transferred Embryos

  • Kim, Dong-Hoon (Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science) ;
  • Kim, Se-Woong (Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science) ;
  • Lee, Min-Jung (Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science) ;
  • Bae, Seong-Hoon (Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science) ;
  • Im, Gi-Sun (Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science) ;
  • Lim, Hyun-Joo (Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science) ;
  • Yang, Byoung-Chul (Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science) ;
  • Seong, Hwan-Hoo (Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science)
  • 발행 : 2008.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study was conducted to investigate an effective recipient oocyte and culture system for producing of Hanwoo (Korean native cattle) somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) embryos. Hanwoo ear skin fibroblasts were used as donor cells. In vitro matured Hanwoo or Holstein oocytes were enucleated, and single donor cells were transferred into the perivitelline space of the enucleated oocytes. The couplets were subsequently fused and activated. The reconstructed embryos were cultured in a conventional or sequential culture system. In the former, embryos were cultured in CR2aa medium for eight days; in the latter, embryos were cultured in modified CR2aa-A (mCR2-A) for three days and then further cultured in modified CR2aa-B (mCR2-B) for five days. In the experiment with the recipient oocyte, the rate of embryo development to the blastocyst stage was significantly (p<0.05) higher in Hanwoo recipient oocytes than in Holstein ones (48.8% vs 38.9%). BIastocysts derived from Hanwoo recipient oocytes contained significantly (p<0.05) higher numbers of total cells than those derived from Holstein recipient oocytes ($156.0{\pm}68.2$ vs $134.7{\pm}54.8$). There was no difference in the mean proportion of apoptotic cells in blastocysts between the sources of recipient oocytes. In the experiment with the embryo culture system, the blastocyst rate was somewhat higher in sequential system than in conventional system (50.0% vs 43.5%), though there was no significant difference. The numbers of total ($160.0{\pm}69.0$ vs $156.7{\pm}68.4$) and apoptotic cells ($14.0{\pm}10.4$ vs $11.8{\pm}6.4$) were not different between the culture systems. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that Hanwoo recipient oocytes and the sequential culture system were more effective in supporting the production of Hanwoo SCNT embryos.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Baguisi A, Behboodi E, Melican DT, Pollock JS, Destrempes MM, Cammuso C, Williams JL, Nims SD, Porter CA, Midura P, Palacios MJ, Ayres SL, Denniston RS, Hayes ML, Ziomek CA, Meade HM, Godke RA, Gavin WG, Overstrom EW, Echelard Y (1999): Production of goats by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Nat Biotechnol 17:456-461 https://doi.org/10.1038/8632
  2. Barnes FL, Crombie A, Gardner DK, Dausche A, Lacham-Kaplan O, Suikkari A, Tiglia J, Wood C, Trounson AO (1995): Blastocyst development and birth in vitro maturation of human primary oocytes, intracytoplasmic sperm injection and assisted hatching. Hum Reprod 10:3243-3257 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a135896
  3. Betthauser J, Forsberg E, Augenstein M, Childs L, Eilertsen K, Enos J, Forsythe T, Golueke P, Jurgella G, Koppang R, Lesmeister T, Mallon K, Mell G, Misica P, Pace M, Pfister-Genskow M, Strelchenko N, Voelker G, Watt S, Thompson S, Bishop M (2000): Production of cloned pigs from in vitro systems. Nat Biotechnol 18:1055-1059 https://doi.org/10.1038/80242
  4. Chastant S, Christians E, Campion E, Renard JP (1996): Quantitative control of gene expression by nucleocytoplasmic interactions in early mouse embryos: consequence for reprogrammation by nuclear transfer. Mol Reprod Dev 44:423-432 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199608)44:4<423::AID-MRD1>3.0.CO;2-N
  5. Cibelli JB, Stice SL, Golueke PJ, Kane JJ, Jerry J, Blackwell C, Ponce de Leon FA, Robl JM (1998): Cloned transgenic calves produced from nonquiescent fetal fibroblasts. Science 280:1256-1258 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5367.1256
  6. Dinnyes A, De Sousa P, King T, Wilmut I (2002): Somatic cell nuclear transfer: recent progress and challenges. Cloning Stem Cells 4:81-90 https://doi.org/10.1089/153623002753632075
  7. Fujino Y, Ozaki K, Yamamasu S, Ito F, Matsuoka I, Hayashi E, Nakamura H, Ogita S, Sato E, Inoue M (1996): DNA fragmentation of oocytes in aged mice. Hum Reprod 11:1480-1483 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019421
  8. Fulka JJr, Loi P, Ledda S, Moor RM, Fulka J (2001): Nuclear transfer in mammals: how the oocyte cytoplasm modifies the transferred nucleus. Theriogenology 55:1373-1380 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00488-5
  9. Gardner DK (1994): Mammalian embryo culture in the absence of serum or somatic cell support. Cell Biol Int 18:1163-1179 https://doi.org/10.1006/cbir.1994.1043
  10. Gardner DK, Lane M (1996): Alleviation of the "2- cell block" and development to the blastocyst of CF- 1 mouse embryos: Role of amino acids, EDTA and physical parameters. Hum Reprod 11:2703-2712 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019195
  11. Gardner DK, Lane MW, Lane M (2000): EDTA stimulates cleavage stage bovine embryo development in culture but inhibits blastocyst development and differentiation. Mol Reprod Dev 57:256-261 https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2795(200011)57:3<256::AID-MRD7>3.0.CO;2-P
  12. Gardner DK, Lane M, Schoolcraft WB (2002): Physiology and culture of human blastocyst. J Reprod Immunol 55:85-100 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0378(01)00136-X
  13. Gandolfi TA, Gandolfi F (2001): The maternal legacy to the embryo: cytoplasmic components and their effects on early development. Theriogenology 55: 1255-1276 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00481-2
  14. Gao S, Czirr E, Chung YG, Han Z, Latham KE (2004): Genetic variation in oocyte phenotype revealed through parthenogenesis and cloning: correlation with differences in pronuclear epigenetic modification. Biol Reprod 70:1162-1170 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.103.024216
  15. Ghandi AP, Lane M, Gardner DK, Krisher RL (2001): Substrate utilization in porcine embryos cultured in NCSU23 and G1.2/G2.2 sequential culture media. Mol Reprod Dev 58:269-275 https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2795(200103)58:3<269::AID-MRD4>3.0.CO;2-L
  16. Gomez MC, Jenkins JA, Giraldo A, Harris RF, King A, Dresser BL, Pope CE (2003): Nuclear transfer of synchronized african wild cat somatic cells into enucleated domestic cat oocytes. Biol Reprod 69:1032-1041 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.102.014449
  17. Han YM, Kang YK, Koo DB, Lee KK (2003): Nuclear reprogramming of cloned embryos produced in vitro. Theriogenology 59:33-44 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)01271-2
  18. Heyman Y, Zhou Q, LeBourhis D, Chavatte-Palmer P, Renard JP, Vignon X (2002): Novel approaches and hurdles to somatic cloning in cattle. Cloning Stem Cells 4:47-55 https://doi.org/10.1089/153623002753632048
  19. Hiendleder S, Prelle K, Bruggerhoff K, Reichenbach H-D, Wenigerkind H, Bebbere D, Stojkovic M, Muller S, Brem G, Zakhartchenko V, Wolf E (2004): Nuclear-cytoplasmic interactions affect in utero developmental capacity, phenotype, and cellular metabolism of bovine nuclear transfer fetuses. Biol Reprod 70:1196-1205 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.103.023028
  20. Janny L, Menezo YJ (1996): Maternal age effect on early human embryonic development and blastocyst formation. Mol Reprod Dev 45:31-37 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199609)45:1<31::AID-MRD4>3.0.CO;2-T
  21. Lane M, Gardner DK, Hasler MJ, Hasler JF (2003): Use of G1.2/G2.2 media for commercial bovine embryo culture: equivalent development and pregnancy rates compared to co-culture. Theriogenology 60: 407-419 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00030-X
  22. Lee ES, Fukui Y (1996): Synergistic effect of alanine and glycine on bovine embryos cultured in a chemically defined medium and amino acid uptake by in vitro produced bovine morulae and blastocysts. Biol Reprod 55:1383-1389 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod55.6.1383
  23. Lim K-T, Lee B-C, Kang S-K, Hwang W-S (2003): Effects of protein source and energy substrates on the in vitro development of bovine embryos in a two-step culture system. J Vet Sci 4:73-78
  24. Liu Z, Foote RH (1995): Development of bovine embryos in KSOM with added superoxide dismutase and taurine and five and twenty percent $O_2$. Biol Reprod 53:786-790 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod53.4.786
  25. Miyoshi K, Rzucidlo SJ, Gibbons JR, Arat S, Stice SL (2001): Development of porcine embryos reconstituted with somatic cells and enucleated metaphase I and II oocytes matured in a protein-free medium. BMC Dev Biol 1:12 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-213X-1-12
  26. Miyoshi K, Rzucidlo SJ, Pratt SL, Stice SL (2002): Utility of rapidly matured oocytes as recipients for production of cloned embryos from somatic cells in the pig. Biol Reprod 67:540-545 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod67.2.540
  27. Miyoshi K, Rzucidlo SJ, Pratt SL, Stice SL (2003): Improvements in cloning efficiencies may be possible by increasing uniformity in recipient oocytes and donor cells. Biol Reprod 68:1079-1086 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.102.010876
  28. Niemann N, Wrenzycki C (2000): Alterations of expression of developmentally important genes in preimplantation bovine embryos by in vitro culture conditions: implications for subsequent development. Theriogenology 53:21-34 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00237-X
  29. Piedrahita JA, Wells DN, Miller AL, Oliver JE, Berg MC, Peterson AJ, Tervit HR (2002): Effects of follicular size of cytoplast donor on the efficiency of cloning in cattle. Mol Reprod Dev 61: 317-326 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.10013
  30. Polejaeva IA, Chen SH, Vaught TD, Page RL, Mullins J, Ball S, Dai Y, Boone J, Walker S, Ayares DL, Colman A, Campbell KHS (2000): Cloned pigs produced by nuclear transfer from adult somatic cells. Nature 407:86-90 https://doi.org/10.1038/35024082
  31. Renard JP, Zhou Q, LeBourhis D, Chavatte-Palmer P, Hue I, Heyman Y, Vignon X (2002): Nuclear transfer technologies: between successes and doubts. Theriogenology 57:203-222 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00667-7
  32. Roh S, Yoon JT (2001): Production of Hanwoo (Bos taurus coreanae) fetues following interbreed somatic cell nulcear transfer. J Vet Med Sci 63:945-948 https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.63.945
  33. Salamone DF, Damiani P, Fissore RA, Robl JM, Duby RT (2001): Biochemical and developmental evidence that ooplasmic maturation of pre-pubertal bovine oocytes is compromised. Biol Reprod 64:1761-1768 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod64.6.1761
  34. Spindle A (1995): Beneficial effect of taurine on mouse zygotes developing in protein-free culture medium. Theriogenology 44:761-772 https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(95)00275-D
  35. Swain JE, Bormann CL, Krisher RL (2001): Development and viability of in vitro derived porcine blastocysts cultured in NCSU23 and G1.2/G2.2 sequential medium. Theriogenology 56:459-469 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00577-5
  36. Thouas GA, Trounson AO, Jones GM (2005): Effect of female age on mouse oocyte developmental competence following mitochondrial injury. Biol Reprod 73:366-373 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.105.040956
  37. Van Blerkom J, Davis P, Mathwig V, Alexander S (2002): Domains of high-polarized and low-polarized mitochondria may occur in mouse and human oocytes and early embryos. Hum Reprod 17:393-406 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.2.393
  38. Wilmut I, Schnieke AE, McWhir J, Kind AJ, Campbell KH (1997): Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature 385:810-813 https://doi.org/10.1038/385810a0
  39. Yang XY, Zhao JG, Li HW, Li H, Liu HF, Huang SZ, Zeng YT (2005): Improving in vitro development of cloned bovine embryos with hybrid. (Holstein- Chinese Yellow) recipient oocytes recovered by ovum pick up. Theriogenology 64:1263- 1272 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.11.026
  40. Zimmermann U, Vienken J (1982): Electric field-induced cell-to-cell fusion. J Membr Biol 67:165-182 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01868659