DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Sapphire and Germanium Fibers for Erbium : Yag Lithotripsy

  • Lee, Ho (School of Mechanical Engineering, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Yoon, Ji-Wook (School of Mechanical Engineering, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Jung, Young-Dae (School of Mechanical Engineering, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, Jee-Hyun (Department of Computer Engineering, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Ryan, Robert T. (Division of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center) ;
  • Teichman, Joel M.H. (Division of Urology, St. Paul's Hospital, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia) ;
  • Welch, A.J. (Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station)
  • Received : 2008.10.28
  • Accepted : 2008.12.10
  • Published : 2008.12.31

Abstract

We studied the sapphire and germanium fibers to determine which optical fiber best transmits Erbium:YAG laser for intracorporeal lithotripsy. Human calculi were ablated with an Erbium:YAG laser in contact mode using two fibers. Optical outputs at the distal end of fibers were measured before and after laser lithotripsy. Upon the irradiation on the calculus with the 50 mJ and 100 mJ pulse energy, the output energy at the distal end of germanium fiber declined to approximately 50% of the input energy. For the sapphire fiber, the output energy at the distal end remained unchanged with 100 mJ input energy; however the output energy had dropped to 50% for 200 mJ input energy. In order to examine how the types of target tissue affect the fiber damage, the sapphire fiber was tested for the irradiation on soft tissue and water as well. No energy decline was observed during soft tissue and water irradiation. We also characterized ablation craters with both optical fibers. Both fibers produced similar craters on calculi in terms of depth and diameter. Sapphire fibers are better suited than germanium fibers for Erbium:YAG lithotripsy in terms of the fiber damage.

Keywords

References

  1. W. P. Mulvaney and C. W. Beck, “The laser beam in urology,” J. Urol., vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 112-115, 1968 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)62652-1
  2. S. P. Dretler, “Laser lithotripsy: A review of 20 years of research and clinical applications,” Lasers Surg. Med., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 341-356, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.1900080403
  3. K. F. Chan, T. J. Pfefer, J. M. H. Teichman and A. J. Welch, “A perspective on laser lithotripsy: The fragmentation processes,” J. Endourology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 257-273, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1089/089277901750161737
  4. J. M. H. Teichman, G. J. Vassar, J. T. Bishoff and G. C. Bellman, “Holmium:YAG fragments are smaller than Lithoclast, pulsed dye, or electrohydraulic lithotripsy,” J. Urol., vol. 159, no. 1, pp. 17-23, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63998-3
  5. G. J. Vassar, J. M. H. Teichman and R. D. Glickman, “Holmium:YAG lithotripsy efficiency varies with energy density,” J. Urol., vol. 160, no 2, pp. 471-476, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)62927-6
  6. M. Sofer, J. D. Watterson, T. A. Wollin, L. Nott, H. Razvi and J. D. Denstedt, “Holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for upper urinary tract calculi in 598 patients,” J. Urol., vol. 167, no 1, pp. 31-4, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65376-1
  7. J. M. H. Teichman, K. F. Chan, P. P. Cecconi, N. S. Corbin, A. D. Kamerer, R. D. Glickman and A. J. Welch, “Er:YAG versus Ho:YAG lithotripsy,” J. Urol., vol. 165, no. 3, pp. 876-879, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66548-2
  8. H. Lee, H. W. Kang, J. M. H. Teichman, J. Oh and A. J. Welch, “Urinary calculus fragmentation during Ho:YAG and Er:YAG lithotripsy,” Lasers Surg. Med., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 39-51, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.20258
  9. K. F. Chan, D. X. Hammer, B. Choi, A. J. Welch, J. M. H. Teichman, H. S. McGuff, H. Pratisto and E. D. Jansen, “Free electron laser lithotripsy threshold radiant exposures,” J. Endourology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 161-167, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2000.14.161
  10. K. F. Chan, H. Lee, J. M. H. Teichman, A. Kamerer, H. S. McGuff, G. Vargas and A. J. Welch, “Erbium:YAG laser lithotripsy mechanism,” J. Urol., vol. 168, no. 2, pp. 436-441, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64653-8
  11. G. M. Hale and M. R. Query, “Optical constants of water in the 200-nm to 200-um wavelength region,” Appl. Opt., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 555-563, 1973 https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.12.000555
  12. C. A. Chaney, Y. Yang and N. M. Fried, “Hybrid germanium/silica optical fibers for endoscopic delivery of Erbium:YAG laser radiation,” Lasers Surg. Med., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 5-11, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.10249
  13. Y. Yang, C. A. Chaney and N. M. Fried, “Erbium:YAG laser lithotripsy using hybrid germanium/silica optical fibers,” J. Endourology, vol. 18, no. 9, pp.830-835, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2004.18.830
  14. T. J. Polletto, A. K. Ngo, A. Tchapyjnikov, K. Levin, D. Tran and N. M. Fried, “Comparison of germanium oxide fibers with silica and sapphire fiber tips for transmission of Erbium: YAG laser radiation,” Lasers Surg. Med., vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 787-791, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.20382
  15. K. Iwai, Y. W. Shi, K. Nito, Y. Matsuura, T. Kasai, M. Miyagi, S. Saito, Y. Arai, N. Ioritani, Y. Okagami, M. Nemec, J. Sulc, H. Jelinkova, M. Zavoral, O. Kohler and P. Drlik, “Erbium:YAG laser lithotripsy by use of a flexible hollow waveguide with an end-scaling cap,” Appl. Opt., vol. 42, no. 13, pp. 2431-2435, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.42.002431
  16. H. Lee, T. R. Ryan, A. Lee, J. H. Teichman, A. J. Welch, “Feasibility study of Er:YAG lithotripsy,” Lasers Surg. Med., vol. 15 (Suppl), pp. 12, 2003
  17. S. S. Spore, J. M. H. Teichman, N. S. Corbin, P. C. Champion, E. D. Williamson and R. D. Glickman, “Holmium:YAG lithotripsy: optimal power settings,” J. Endourol, vol. 13, no.8, pp. 559-566, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1089/end.1999.13.559

Cited by

  1. The Advent of Laser Therapies in Dermatology and Urology: Underlying Mechanisms, Recent Trends and Future Directions vol.13, pp.3, 2009, https://doi.org/10.3807/JOSK.2009.13.3.321
  2. Comparison of fluoride and sapphire optical fibers for Er: YAG laser lithotripsy vol.3, pp.5-6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.200900104