국내 양돈장에서 돼지글래셔병을 동반한 PMWS에 대한 M+ $Parapac^{(R)}$의 방어효과

Efficacy of $M+\;Parapac^{(R)}$ on protection against PMWS with $Gl{\ddot{a}}sser's$ disease

  • 안나경 (강원대학교 수의학부대학) ;
  • 서태원 (강원대학교 수의학부대학) ;
  • 정현규 (도드람 양돈조합) ;
  • 윤병일 (강원대학교 수의학부대학) ;
  • 한정희 (강원대학교 수의학부대학)
  • Ahn, Na-Kyoung (Department of Veterinary Pathology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Institute of Veterinary, Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Seo, Tae-Won (Department of Veterinary Pathology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Institute of Veterinary, Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Jeong, Hyun-Kyu (Dodram Pig Farmer's Co-operative) ;
  • Yoon, Byung-Il (Department of Veterinary Pathology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Institute of Veterinary, Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Han, Jeong-Hee (Department of Veterinary Pathology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Institute of Veterinary, Science, Kangwon National University)
  • 발행 : 2008.09.30

초록

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and cross-protection of serovar 12 against serovar 4 or 5 of H parasuis with M+$Parapac^{(R)}$. A total of 141 piglets from 2(A and B) farms were used and divided into experimental group and control group in each farm. Farm A has been detected H parasuis serovar 12, whereas farm B has been detected H parasuis serovar 4 or 5 from post-weaned pigs with PMWS. The piglets were vaccinated intramuscularly with 2.0ml of M+$Parapac^{(R)}$ in experimental group or normal saline in control group at 1 week of age. A same booster dose was given at 3 weeks of age. In order to value the antibody titer to H parasuis using by tube agglutination test, blood samples were collected from piglets at the aged of 1 week, 6 and 14 weeks. In experimental group and control group, the average antibody titers were $32.5{\pm}21.0,\;114.5{\pm}34.0,\;98.1{\pm}55.4$ and $32.9{\pm}18.6,\;25.8{\pm}36.9,\; 746.7{\pm}1,215.8$ at the aged of 1 week, 6 and 14 weeks, respectively. The cumulative clinical sign indexes by standard guideline of Schering-Plough Animal Health Corp were 486 and 1,069, respectively. The average daily gains and feed conversion rates were $0.553{\pm}0.016kg$ and $0.492{\pm}0.004kg$, and 1.99 and 2.24, respectively. The average gross lesion scores were $1.0{\pm}0.8$ and $1.9{\pm}0.6$, respectively. According to these results, the M+$Parapac^{(R)}$ containing H parasuis serovar 12 may be induce circulating antibodies that cross-react with serovar 4 or 5 and have a protection of PMWS with H parasuis.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Straw BE, Zimmerman JJ, D'Allaire S, et al. 2006. Disease of Swine 9eds. Blackwell Publishing:681-690
  2. Enoe C, Mousing J, Schirmer AL, et al. 2002. Infectious and rearing-system re-lated risk factors for chronic pleuritis in slaughter pigs. Prev Vet Med 54(4): 337-49 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(02)00029-6
  3. Rautiainen E, Oravainen J, Virolainen JV, et al. 2001. Regional eradication of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae from pig herds and documentation of freedom of the disease. Acta Vet Scand 42(3): 355-364 https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-42-355
  4. Oliveira S, Galina L, Pijoan C. 2001. Development of a PCR test to diagnose Haemophilus parpasuis infection. J Vet Diagn Invest 13:495-501 https://doi.org/10.1177/104063870101300607
  5. Cu HP, Nguyen NN, Do NT. 1998. Prevalence of Haemophilus sp infection in the upper respiratory tract of pigs and some characteristics of the isolates. Khoa Hoc Ky Thuat Thu Y 5:88-93
  6. Hjarre A. 1958. Enzootic virus pneumonia and Glasser's disease of swine. Adv Vet Sci 4:235
  7. Baehler JF, Burgisser H, Nicolet J, et al. 1974. Haemophilus parasuis chez le pore. Scweiz. Arch. Tierhielk 116:183-188
  8. 이난주. 1994. Haemophilus parasuis균의 1. 항원 특성과 분리균의 혈청학적 분류에 관한 연구. 단국대학교 박사학위논문
  9. Choi YK, Goyal SM, Joo HS. 2003. Retrospective analysis of etiologic agents associated with respiratory diseases in pigs. Can Vet J 44(9): 735-737
  10. Bak YB, Mah JS, Noh HY. 1982. A pathological study on the cases of Glasser's disease. Res. Rep Kor Ins Anim Sci 2: 71-79
  11. Lee RJ, Seok HB, Cho SG. 1994. Biochemical properties of H parasuis and serological classification of the iso-lates. Kor J Vet Publ Hlth 18:127-138
  12. Won HK. 2003. Characterization of Haemophilus parasuis isolates from swine in Korea. M.S. Thesis. Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Kangwon
  13. Kang ZW. 2004. Studies on Haemo-philus parasuis in pigs. M.S. Thesis. Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Kangwon
  14. Rapp-Gabrielson VJ, Kocur G, Clark F, et al. 1996. Efficacy and duration of immunity of the Haemophilus parasuis fractions of Suvaxyn RespiFend MH/HPS. Proc Int Congr Pig Vet Soc 14: 300
  15. Takahashi K, Nagai S, Yagihashi T, et al. 2001. A cross-protection experiment in pigs vaccinated with Haemophilus parasuis serovars 2 and 5 bacterins, and evaluation of a bivalent vaccine under laboratory and field conditions. J Vet Med Sci 63(5):487-491 https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.63.487
  16. Bak H, Riising HJ. 2002. Protection of vaccinated pigs against experimental infection with homologous and hetero-logous Haemophilus parasuis. Vet Rec 151:502-505 https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.151.17.502
  17. Collins CH, Lyne PM, Grange JM. 1995. Collins and Lyne'x Microbiological Method. 7eds. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann :118-120
  18. Gunnarsson A, Biberstein EL, Hurvell B. 1977. Serologic studies on porcine strains of Haemophilus parahaemolyticus(Pleuropneumoniae): Agglutination reac-tion. Am J Vet Res 38: 1111-1114
  19. 석호봉, 이관형, 이란주, 예재길. 1993. 돼지 다발성장막염 및 관절염의 원인균 조사 및 분리균의 병발성에 관한 연구. 대한수의공중보건학회지 17(1):1-12
  20. Jayappa H, Lehr C, Wasmoen T. 2004. Evaluation of efficacy of Haemophilus parasuis bacterin in providing protecion against heterologous challenge. Allen D Leman Swine Conf Proc 31: 61
  21. Jayappa H, Lehr C, Erskine J, et al. 2006. Cross protecion of a Haemophilus parasuis serotype 12 vaccine(Parapac$^{circledR}$)against serotype 4. Am Assoc Swine Vet : 181-185
  22. Kocur G, Clark J, Muir S, et al. 1997. Haemo-philus parasuis immunity in swine after vaccination. Vet Med 92: 1-7
  23. Olvera A, Calsamiglia M, Aragon V. 2006. Genotypic diversity of field strains. Am Soc Microbiol 72: 3984-3992
  24. Solano GI, Bautista E, Molitor TW, et al. 1998. Effect of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection on the clearance of Haemophilus parasuis by porcine alveolar macrophages. Can J Vet Res 62(4): 251-256
  25. Karpinski TM, Zorawski C, Skwarek P, et al. 1979. Comparison of the values of selected reagents for the diagnosis of swine brucellosis. I. Preparation and standardization of antiglobulin serum. Pol Arch Weter 22(1): 29-40