Comparative serology of human brucellosis in Korea

  • Lee, Sung-Il (Model Animal Division, Institute for Biomedical Science, Kansai Medical University) ;
  • Choi, Min-Jung (Korean Zoonoses Research Institute, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Hur, Jin (Korean Zoonoses Research Institute, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Islam, Md Ariful (Korean Zoonoses Research Institute, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Khatun, Mst Minara (Korean Zoonoses Research Institute, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Baek, Byeong-Kirl (Korean Zoonoses Research Institute, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Chang-Seup (Department of Internal Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School) ;
  • Kakoma, Ibulaimu (College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois) ;
  • Bolye, Stephen M (Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University) ;
  • Srirangananathan, Nammalwar (Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University) ;
  • Young, Edward John (Baylor College of Medicine, Veterans Administration Medical Center)
  • Published : 2008.09.30

Abstract

The study was carried out to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of the tube agglutination test (TAT), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the 2-Mercaptoethanol agglutination test (2-MAT) to detect human brucellosis patients in Korea. We examined 87 serum samples of people in the rural farm areas where bovine brucellosis had been reported. People in this study were divided into seven groups- farmers and their families, veterinarians, veterinary quarantine workers, livestock health control officers, artificial inseminators, livestock traders and healthy control individuals. Among 87 people, 65 were males and 22 were females ranging in age from 13 to 72 years. Of 87 serum samples, ELISA detected 21.84%, TAT detected 11.50% and 2-MAT detected 8.05% Brucella positive sera. Brucella specific IgG ELISA antibody titer was recorder higher in the individuals between the ages of 50 and 65 years. The highest prevalence rate of brucellosis(29.4%) was recorded in the cattle farmers and their family members followed by quarantine veterinary office workers (25%) and practicing veterinarians 01.1%). The majority of the Brucella sero-positive individuals in this study had a history of direct contact with animals.

Keywords

References

  1. Young EJ. 1983. Human brucellosis. Rev Infect Dis 5:821-842 https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/5.5.821
  2. Corbel MJ. 1977. Brucellosis: an over-view. Emerg Infect Dis 3:213-221 https://doi.org/10.3201/eid0302.970219
  3. Park MS, Woo YS, Lee MJ, et al. 2003. The first case of human brucellosis in Korea. Infect Chemother 35:461-466
  4. http://www.kcdc.go.kr
  5. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Re-public of Korea. Monthly report on noti-fiable diseases(Livestock and poultry) 47:752. 2004. 1-2007. 8
  6. Baek BK, Lim CW, Rahman MS, et al. 2003. Brucella abortus infection in indi-genous Korean dogs. Can J Vet Res 67:312-314
  7. Young EJ. 1991. Serologic diagnosis of human brucellosis: analysis of 214 cases by agglutination tests and review of the literature. Rev Infect Dis 13:359-372 https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/13.3.359
  8. Araj GF, Kattar MM, Fattouh LG, et al.. 2005. Evaluation of the PANBIO Bru-cella immunoglobulin G(IgG) and IgM enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for diagnosis of human brucellosis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 12:1334-1335
  9. Corbel MJ. 1989. Brucellosis: Epidemio-logy and prevalence worldwide. In: Young EJ, Corbel MJ. eds. Brucellosis: Clinical and Laboratory Aspects. Boca Raton. FL: CRC: Press:p.25-40
  10. Alton GG, Jones LM, Pietz DE. 1975. Laboratory techniques in brucellosis. World Health Organization Monograph Series
  11. Joseph L, Wolfson DB, Berger R, 1995. Some comments on Bayesian sample size determination. The Stat J Institute Stat 44:167-177
  12. Memish ZA, Almuneef M, Mah MW, et al. 2002. Comparison of the Brucella standard agglutination test with the ELISA Ig A and Ig M in patients with Brucella bacteremia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 44:129-132 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-8893(02)00426-1
  13. Pak DK, Lee CW. 1959. Brucellosis of cattle in Korea. J Korean Vet Med Assoc 3:392-395
  14. Park MY, Lee CS, Choi YS, et al. 2005. A sporadic outbreak of human brucel-losis in Korea. J Korean Med Sci 20:941-946 https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2005.20.6.941
  15. Lim HS, Min YS. 2005. Study on the recognition of brucellosis for rural resi-dents. J Agric Med Comm Health 30:51-61
  16. Lim HS, Min YS. Lee HS. 2005. Inves-tigation of a series of brucellosis cases in Gyeongsangbuk-do during 2003-2004. Infect Chemother 38:482-488
  17. Kakoma I, Baek BK, Olsen S, et al. 2007. Comments on efforts to eradicate brucellosis. JAVMA 2:230
  18. Lopez-Merimo A, Lopez-Santiago R. 1989. Immunology of brucellosis in humans. In: Madkour MM(eds). Brucellosis. London:45-58
  19. Yeom JS, Jung HC, Nam JH, et al. 1998. Seroepidemiologic study of brucel-losis in Cheju Island. Korean. J Infect Dis 30:165-172 https://doi.org/10.1080/003655498750003564
  20. Jung SJ, Kim SB, Park BW, et al. 2004. A case of human Brucellosis who had no contact with infected animal sero-epidemiology study on market. Korean medical data base. Infect Chemother 36:170-174
  21. Schurig GG, Roop RM, Vagchi T, et al. 1991. Biological properties of RB51: a stable rough strain of Brucella abortus. Vet Microbiol 28:171-188 https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1135(91)90091-S
  22. Olsen SC, Palmer M, Stevens MG, et al. 1996. Brucella abortus strain RB51 as a calfhood vaccine in bison or adult vac-cine in pregnant cattle. US Anim Health Assoc:71-73