References
- Cummins BH, Robertson JT, Gill SS : Surgical experience with an implanted artificial cervical joint. J Neurosurg 88 : 943-948, 1998 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1998.88.6.0943
- Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim TH, Jeong ST, Kim JG, Hodges SD, et al : Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine 27 : 2431-2434, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200211150-00003
- Goffin J, Geusens E, Vantomme N, Quintens E, Waerzeggers Y, Depreitere B, et al : Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 17 : 79-85, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1097/00024720-200404000-00001
- Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, Jones PK, Bohlman HH : Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81 : 519-528, 1999 https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199904000-00009
- Katsuura A, Hukuda S, Saruhashi Y, Mori K : Kyphotic malalignment after anterior cervical fusion is one of the factors promoting the degenerative process in adjacent intervertebral levels. Eur Spine J 10 : 320-324, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1007/s005860000243
- Kim SH, Shin HC, Shin DA, Kim KN, Yoon do H : Early clinical experience with the mobi-C disc prosthesis. Yonsei Med J 48 : 457-464, 2007 https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2007.48.3.457
- Kim SW, Shin JH, Arbatin JJ, Park MS, Chung YK, McAfee PC : Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on maintaining sagittal alignment of the functional spinal unit and overall sagittal balance of the cervical spine. Eur Spine J 17 : 20-29, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0459-y
- Kulkarni V, Rajshekhar V, Raghuram L : Accelerated spondylotic changes adjacent to the fused segment following central cervical corpectomy : magnetic resonance imaging study evidence. J Neurosurg 100 : 2-6, 2004 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2004.100.1.0002
- Mummaneni PV, Burkus JK, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Zdeblick TA : Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion : a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 6 : 198-209, 2007 https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2007.6.3.198
- Nabhan A, Ahlhelm F, Pitzen T, Steudel WI, Jung J, Shariat K, et al : Disc replacement using Pro-Disc C versus fusion : a prospective randomised and controlled radiographic and clinical study. Eur Spine J 16 : 423-430, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0226-5
- Pickett GE, Rouleau JP, Duggal N : Kinematic analysis of the cervical spine following implantation of an artificial cervical disc. Spine 30 : 1949-1954, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000176320.82079.ce
- Sasso RC, Smucker JD, Hacker RJ, Heller JG : Artificial disc versus fusion : a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients. Spine 32 : 2933-2940, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815d0034
- Shim CS, Lee SH, Park HJ, Kang HS, Hwang JH : Early clinical and radiologic outcomes of cervical arthroplasty with Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech 19 : 465-470, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bsd.0000211235.76093.6b
- Silber JS, Anderson DG, Daffner SD, Brislin BT, Leland JM, Hilibrand AS, et al : Donor site morbidity after anterior iliac crest bone harvest for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine 28 : 134-139, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200301150-00008
- St John TA, Vaccaro AR, Sah AP, Schaefer M, Berta SC, Albert T, et al : Physical and monetary costs associated with autogenous bone graft harvesting. Am J Orthop 32 : 18-23, 2003
- van Jonbergen HP, Spruit M, Anderson PG, Pavlov PW : Anterior cervical interbody fusion with a titanium box cage : early radiological assessment of fusion and subsidence. Spine J 5 : 645-649, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2005.07.007
- Weinhoffer SL, Guyer RD, Herbert M, Griffith SL : Intradiscal pressure measurements above an instrumented fusion. A cadaveric study. Spine 20 : 526-531, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199503010-00004
- Yoon DH, Yi S, Shin HC, Kim KN, Kim SH : Clinical and radiological results following cervical arthroplasty. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 148 : 943-950, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-006-0805-6
Cited by
- Intermediate clinical and radiological results of cervical TDR (Mobi-C®) with up to 2 years of follow-up vol.18, pp.6, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1017-6
-
Surgical Outcome of Cervical Arthroplasty Using
$Bryan^{(R)}$ vol.46, pp.6, 2009, https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2009.46.6.532 - Comparative Study Between Cervical Disc Prosthesis and Anterior Cervical Discectomy With Fusion vol.20, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1097/wnq.0b013e3181ebceca
- Cervical Radiculopathy due to Cervical Degenerative Diseases : Anatomy, Diagnosis and Treatment vol.48, pp.6, 2008, https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2010.48.6.473
- Advantages of the Plating for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and fusion: Comparison with Wearing Cervical Collar Without Plate vol.8, pp.3, 2008, https://doi.org/10.14245/kjs.2011.8.3.161
- Remodeling of adjacent spinal alignments following cervical arthroplasty and anterior discectomy and fusion vol.21, pp.2, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-2000-6
- Past, Present, and Future of Cervical Arthroplasty vol.62, pp.2, 2008, https://doi.org/10.2302/kjm.2012-0014-re
- Arthroplasty Versus Fusion in Single-Level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: A Cochrane Review vol.38, pp.17, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e3182994a32
- Fusion-Nonfusion Hybrid Construct Versus Anterior Cervical Hybrid Decompression and Fusion : A Comparative Study for 3-Level Cervical Degenerative Disc Diseases vol.39, pp.23, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000000588
- X-Ray-based Kinematic Analysis of Cervical Spine According to Prosthesis Designs: Analysis of the Mobi C, Bryan, PCM, and Prestige LP vol.28, pp.5, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1097/bsd.0b013e318288a923
- Effectiveness and safety of Mobi-C for treatment of single-level cervical disc spondylosis : a randomised control trial with a minimum of five years of follow-up vol.98, pp.6, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.98b6.36381
- Segmental Motion of the Cervical Spine After Total Disc Replacement Using ActivC Versus Discectomy and Fusion Using Stand-alone Cage vol.126, pp.None, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.233
- Cervical radiculopathy: is a prosthesis preferred over fusion surgery? A systematic review vol.29, pp.11, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06175-y
- Preliminary Clinical Outcome of One-level Mobi-C Total Disc Replacement in Japanese Population vol.5, pp.6, 2008, https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2021-0015
- Cervical Total Disc Replacement and Heterotopic Ossification: A Review of Literature Outcomes and Biomechanics vol.15, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2019.0234
- Deep Learning for Adjacent Segment Disease at Preoperative MRI for Cervical Radiculopathy vol.301, pp.3, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2021204731
- The Clinical Relevance of the Cervical Disc Prosthesis : Combining Clinical Results of Two RCTs vol.47, pp.1, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000004113