Journal of Embryo Transfer (한국수정란이식학회지)

The Korean Society of Embryo Transfer (한국수정란이식학회)
권호 표지

Estimation of Genetic Characteristic and Cumulative Power of Breed Discrimination Using Microsatellite Markers in Hanwoo

Microsatellite Marker를 사용한 한우 품종 식별력 및 유전적 특성 분석

  • Oh, Jae-Don (National Livestock Research Institute, RDA) ;
  • Lee, Jin-Ah (Genomic Informatics Center, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Kong, Hong-Sik (Genomic Informatics Center, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Park, Keong-Do (Genomic Informatics Center, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Yoon, Du-Hak (National Livestock Research Institute, RDA) ;
  • Jeon, Gwang-Ju (Genomic Informatics Center, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Lee, Hak-Kyo (Genomic Informatics Center, Hankyong National University)
  • Published : 2008.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

To estimate the genetic characteristics and cumulative power of discrimination (CPD) existing among Hanwoo (Korean cattle) and exotic foreign population (Angus, Herford, Charolais, Holstein) we used a total of 414 genomic DNAs from five breeds population (Hanwoo, Angus, Hereford, Charolais, Holstein). Genetic characteristics indices including mean allele number among loci, unbiased heterozygosity ($h_i$) within locus and polymorphic information content (PIC) and unbiased average heterozygosity (H) among loci in four breeds were calculated using the generated allele frequencies by each marker. The mean allele numbers for all loci ranged between 5 and 7 while heterozygosity (H) ranged from 0.75 (HW) to 0.64 (HF) among loci and across breeds heterozygosity (H) was 0.69. The generated unbiased average heterozygosity among loci in each breed was integrated to the global formula of CPD resulting in 99.71 % within the populations. The genetic variation of HW (Hanwoo) showed highest estimates among the analyzed breeds.

Keywords

References

  1. Barker JSF, Tan SG, Selvaraj OS and Mukherjee TK. 1997. Genetic variation within and relationships among populations of Asian water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). Anim. Genet. 28: 1-13 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.1997.00036.x
  2. Bartfai Z, Kaaroline I, Gaede A, Kimberly Russell and Murakozy G. 2003. Different gender-associated genotype risks of Wegener's granulomatosis and microscopic polyangiitis. Clinical Immunology 109:330-337 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1521-6616(03)00211-0
  3. Behl R, Sherora NJ, Behl J, Tantia MS and Vijh RK. 2002. Microsatellite sequences of mammals and their applications in genome analysis in pigs-a review. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 15:1822-1830 https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2002.1822
  4. Bjornstad G, Nilsen NO and Roed KH. 2003. Genetic relationship between Mongolian and Norwegian horses. Anim. Genet. 34:55-58 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2052.2003.00922.x
  5. Blott SC, Williams JL and Haley CS. 1999. Discriminating among cattle breeds using genetic markers. Heredity 82:613-619 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2540.1999.00521.x
  6. Canon J, Checa ML, Carleos C, Vega-Pla JL, Vallejo M and Dunner S. 2000. The genetic structure of Spanish Celtic horse breeds inferred from microsatellite data. Anim. Genet. 31: 39-48 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2052.2000.00591.x
  7. Fan B, Wang ZG, Li YJ, Zhao XL, Liu B, Zhao SH, Yu M, Li MH, Chen SL, Xiong TA and Li K. 2002. Genetic variation analysis within and among Chinese indigenous swine populations using microsatellite markers. Anim. Genet. 33:422-427 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2052.2002.00898.x
  8. Fan B, Chen YZ, Moran C, Zhao SH, Liu B, Zhu MJ, Xiong TA and Li K. 2005. Individual-breed assignment analysis in swine populations by using microsatellite markers. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 18:1529-1534 https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2005.1529
  9. Li K, Chen Y, Moran C, Fan B, Zhao S and Peng Z. 2000. Analysis of diversity and genetic relationships between four Chinese indigenous pig breeds and one Australian commercial pig breed. Anim. Genet. 31:322-325 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2052.2000.00649.x
  10. MacHugh DE, Loftus RT, Cunningham P and Bradley DG. 1998. Genetic structure of seven European cattle breeds assessed using 20 microsatellite markers. Anim. Genet. 29:333-340 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2052.1998.295330.x
  11. Nei M, Tajima F and Tateno Y. 1983. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data: 2. Gene frequency data. J. Mol. Evol. 19:153-170 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300753
  12. Notter DR. 1999. The importance of genetic diversity in livestock populations of the future. J. Anim. Sci. 77:61-69. Review
  13. Olowofeso OJ, Wang Y, Shen JC, Chen KW, Sheng HW, Zhang P and Wu R. 2005. Estimation of the cumulative power of discrimination in Haimen chicken populations with ten microsatellite markers. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 18: 1066-1070 https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2005.1066
  14. Zhang JH, Xiong YZ and Deng CY. 2005. Correlations of genic heterozygosity and variances with heterosis in a pig populations revealed by microsatellites DNA marker. Asian- Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 18:620-625 https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2005.620