정보관리학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society for information Management)

  • 제24권3호
  • /
  • Pages.179-200
  • /
  • 2007
  • /
  • 1013-0799(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2586-2073(eISSN)
한국정보관리학회 (Korean Society for Information Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

학술지 인용과 웹 링크 분석을 통한 과학기술분야의 학제성 비교 연구

A Comparative Study on Interdisciplinarity in the Fields of Science and Technology Based on Journal Citation and Web Link Analyses

  • 정호연 (연세대학교 대학원 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 정영미 (연세대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • 발행 : 2007.09.29
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 논문에서는 학술지 인용 데이터와 웹 링크 데이터를 이용하여 8개 과학기술 분야의 학제적 구조를 파악하고 각 학문분야 간 학제성을 비교하였다. 분석 대상이 되는 학술지와 웹 페이지의 주제적 성격을 파악하기 위해 기존의 과학기술분류체계를 재구성하여 이용하였다. 이 연구에서 학제성은 여러 학문분야간 학제적 연결의 측면에서 파악하였으며, 학제성의 정도는 연관 학문분야의 수로 측정한 학제적 다양성과 자기인용률에 의해 평가하였다. 분석 결과, 학술지 인용 분석에서는 밝혀내지 못한 새로운 학제적 연결을 웹 링크분석에 의해 파악하였으며, 이를 통해 웹 링크 분석이 학제성을 연구하는 수단으로서 유용함을 알 수 있었다. 또한 인용 분석과 링크 분석에서 모두 자연과학 분야에 비해 공학 분야의 학제성이 대체로 더 높게 나타났다.

This study identifies the interdisciplinary structures of 8 scientific disciplines in science and technology using the data from journal citations and web links, and compares the interdisciplinarity among these scientific disciplines. The interdisciplinarity refers to interdisciplinary connections among scientific fields and the degree of interdisciplinarity is measured by the number of associated fields and the rate of self-citation. A re-arranged classification scheme for science and technology was adopted to identify subject categories of journals and web pages. Web link analysis revealed a few additional interdisciplinary connections that were not identified by the journal citation analysis, thus demonstrating that it is useful means of investigating the interdisciplinarity of scientific fields. Besides, in most of the cases the interdisciplinarity of the engineering fields were found greater than that of the fields in natural sciences in both analyses.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 정영미. 2005. 정보검색연구. 서울: 구미무역(주) 출판부
  2. Bordons, M., Zulueta, M. A., Romeo, F., and Barrigon. S. 1999. 'Measuring interdisciplinary collaboration within a university: The effects of the multidis ciplinary research programme.' Scientometrics, 46: 383-398 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459599
  3. Carayole, N. and Nguyen Thi, T. U. 2004. 'Why do Academic Scientists Engage In Interdisciplinary Research?' Working Papers of BETA, Bureau d'Economie Theorique et Appliquee, ULP, Strasbourg
  4. Goldstone, R. L. and Leydesdorff, L. 2006. 'The import and export of Cognitive Science'. Cognitive Science, 30: 983-993 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_96
  5. Hargens, L. L. 1986. 'Migration patterns of U.S. Ph.D.s among disciplines and specialties'. Scientometrics, 9: 145-164 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017238
  6. Klein, J. T. and William, H. N. 1998. 'Advancing Interdisci plinary Studies'. Pp. 3-22 in Interdisciplinarity: Essays form the Literature, William H. N, editor. New York: Colleage Entrance Examination Board, 1998: 3. Quoted in Seipel, M. 2005. 'Interdisciplinarity: An Introduction'.
  7. Morillo, F., Bordons, M., and Gomez, 1. 2001. 'An approach to interdisciplinarity through bibliometric indicators'. Scientometrics, 51(1): 203-222 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010529114941
  8. Morillo, F., Bordons M., and Gomez, 1. 2003. 'lnterdisciplinarity in Science: A Tentative Typology Disciplines and Research Areas'. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(13): 1237-1249 https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10326
  9. Porter, A. L. and Chubin, D. E. 1985. 'An indicator of crossdisciplinary research'. Scientometrics, 8: 161-176 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016934
  10. Qin, J., Lancaster, F. W., and Allen, B, 1997. 'Types and levels of collaboration in interdisciplinary research in the sciences', Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48: 893-916 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199710)48:10<893::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-X
  11. Rinia, E. J., van Leeuwen, Th. N., van Vuren, H. G. and van Raan, A. F. J. 2001. 'Influence of interdisciplinarity on peerreview and bibliometric evaluations in physics research'. Research Policy, 30: 357-361 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00082-2
  12. Rinia, E. J., van Leeuwen, T. N., and van Raan, A. F. J. 2002. 'Impact measures of interdisciplinary research in physics'. Scientometrics, 53(2): 241-248 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014856625623
  13. Sanze-Casado, E., Martin-Moreno, C., Garcia-Zorita, C., and Lascurain-Sanchez, M. L. 2004. 'Study of interdisciplinarity in chemistry research based on the production of Puerto Rican scientists 1992-2001' Informationresearch, 9(4). (http://informationr.netlir/9-4/paper182.html)
  14. Sanz-Menendez, L., Bordons, M., and Zulueta, M. A. 2001. 'Interdisciplinarity as a multidimensional concept: Its measure in three different research areas. Research Evaluation, 10: 47-58 https://doi.org/10.3152/147154401781777123
  15. Schmoch, U., Breiner, S., Cuhls, K., Rinze, S., and Munt, G. 1994. Interdisciplinary Co-operation of Research Teams in Science Intensive Aareas of Technology. Final Report to the Commission of the European Union, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research, Karlsruhe, Germany. Quoted in Carayole, N. and Nguyen Thi, T. U. 2004. 'Why do Academic Scientists Engage in Interdisciplinary Research? Working Papers of BETA, Bureau d'Economie Theorique et Appliquee, ULP, trasbourg
  16. Schwechheimer, R. and Winterhager, M. 2001. 'Mapping interdis ciplinary reaserch fronts in neuroscience: A bibliometric view to retrograde amnesia'. Scientometrics, 51(1): 311-318. of BETA, Bureau d'Economie Theorique et Appliquee, ULP, Strasbourg https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010541418576
  17. Tang, R. 2004. 'Visualizing Interdisciplinary Citations to and from Information and Library Science Publications'. Proc. of Eighth International Conference on Information Visualization https://doi.org/10.1109/IV.2004.1320259
  18. Tomov, D. T. and Mufafov, H. G. 1996. 'Comparaive indicators of interdisciplinary in modern science'. Scientometrics, 18: 309-319
  19. Urata, H. 1990. 'Information flows among academic disciplines in Japan'. Scientometrics, 18: 309-319 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017767

피인용 문헌

  1. Examining the Intellectual Structure of a Medical Informatics Journal with Author Co-citation Analysis and Co-word Analysis vol.30, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.2.207
  2. Network Analysis of East Asian Research in South Korea for the 2004-2013 Period vol.11, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5392/IJoC.2015.11.1.052
  3. Examining on the Relationship Between Interdisciplinarity and Research Impact with Analyzing the Journals of Library and Information Science Field vol.30, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.4.007