Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology (한국농림기상학회지)

Korean Society of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology (한국농림기상학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Two Different Enclosure-based Measurements Applications for Trace Gas Surface Emission and Sensitivity Analysis for Soil NO Emission by Using a Flow-through Dynamic System

지표 미량기체 방출에 대한 두 가지 다른 형태의 Enclosure 기반 측정 방법의 응용 및 Flow-through Dynamic System을 이용한 토양 NO 방출의 민감도 분석

  • Kim, Deug-Soo (School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Kunsan National University)
  • 김득수 (군산대학교 토목환경공학부)
  • Published : 2007.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Rapid increases in the concentrations of greenhouse gases and many other chemically important trace gases have occurred over the last several centuries. For understanding the roles of these important gases in global change, it is essential to identify their sources and sinks, to characterize biogenic gas fluxes between the biosphere and atmosphere, and to understand the processes that control them. In this paper, enclosure-based measurements are described in a practical manner for field experiments. Theoretical reviews of mass balance equation in the enclosure and sensitivity of the flow-through dynamic flux chamber technique are presented; specifically for the case of NO flux measurements from soil surface. The physical system and theory behind the flow-through dynamic flux chamber method are examined. New calculation flux formula was introduced by considering NO chemical loss on chamber wall and uncertainties of the NO flux calculation were discussed.

지난 수 세기 동안 온실기체와 기타 화학적으로 중요한 미량기체들이 급격하게 증가하였다. 이러한 주요기체가 기후 변화에 미치는 영향을 이해하기 위해서는 각 기체들의 흡원과 발원을 규명하고, 생물권과 대기권 사이에서 발생하는 생물 기원 기체 플럭스들을 특성화하며, 주요 기체를 조절하는 프로세스들을 이해해야 한다. 본 논문에서는 야외 실험을 위한 실용적 방법인 enclosure 기반의 관측법을 소개한다. 특히, 토양표면에서 방출되는 일산화질소 플럭스에 대한 enclosure내에서의 질량수지 방정식과 flow-through dynamic 플럭스 챔버 기법의 민감도를 제시하고 flow-through dynamic 플럭스 챔버 방법의 물리적인 시스템과 이론을 소개한다. 또한 챔버 벽에서 발생하는 일산화질소의 손실을 고려하므로써 새로운 플럭스 계산식을 소개하였고 그 계산식의 불확실성을 논의하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Aneja, V.P., W.P. Robarge, and B.D. Holbrook, 1995: Measurement of nitric oxide flux from an upper coastal plain, North Carolina agricultural soil. Atmospheric Environment 29, 3037-3042 https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95)00089-H
  2. Bartlett, D.R., and R.C. Harriss, 1993: Review and assessment of methane emissions from wetlands. Chemosphere 26, 261-320 https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-6535(93)90427-7
  3. Conrad, R., 1994: Compensation concentration as critical variable for regulating the flux of trace gases between soil and atmosphere. Biogeochemistry 27, 155-170
  4. Davidson, E.A., P.M. Vitousek, P.A. Matson, R. RiIey, G. G-Mendez, and J.M. Maass, 1991: Soil emission of nitric oxide in a seasonally dry tropical forest of Mexico. Journal of Geophysical Research 96, 15439-15445 https://doi.org/10.1029/91JD01476
  5. Hutchinson, G.L., and G.P. Livingston, 1993: Use of chamber systems to measure trace gas fluxes. Agricultural Ecosystem Effects on Trace Gases and Global Climate Change, Harper, L.A., A.R. Mosier, J.M. Duxbury, and D.E. Rolston (Eds), American Society of Agronomy Special Publication No. 55. Madison, Wisconsin, 63-78
  6. IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency), 1992: Manual on Measurement of Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Agriculture. INIS Clearinghouse, IAEATECDOC-674, Vienna
  7. Johansson, C., and E. Sanhueza, 1988: Emission of NO from savanna soils during rainy season. Journal of Geophysical Research 93, 14193-14198 https://doi.org/10.1029/JD093iD11p14193
  8. Johansson, C., and L. Granat, 1984: Emission of nitric oxide from arable land. Tellus 36B, 25-37 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.1984.tb00048.x
  9. Johansson, C., H. Rodhe, and E. Sanhueza, 1988: Emission of NO in a tropical savanna and a cloud forest during the dry season Journal of Geophysical Research 93, 7180-7192 https://doi.org/10.1029/JD093iD06p07180
  10. Kaplan, W. A., S. C. Wofsy, M. Keller, and J. M. D. Costa, 1988: Emission of NO and deposition of $O_3$ in a tropical forest system. Journal of Geophysical Research 93, 1389-1395 https://doi.org/10.1029/JD093iD02p01389
  11. Kim, D.-S., 2005: Sensitivity study of the flow-through dynamic flux chamber technique for the soil NO emissions. Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment 21(E3), 75-85
  12. Kim, D.-S., 2001: Measurements of gases emissions from agriculture soils and their characteristics with chamber technique: Emission of NO and $N_2O$. Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment 17(2), 203-212. (in Korean with English abstract)
  13. Kim, D.-S., Harazono, Y., Baten, M.A., Nagai, H., and Tsuruta, H., 2002: Surface flux measurements of $CO_2$ and $N_2O$ from a dried rice paddy in Japan during a fallow winter season. Journal of Air & Waste Management Association 52, 416-422 https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2002.10470795
  14. Kim, D.S., V.P. Aneja, and W.P. Robarge, 1994: Characterization of nitrogen oxide fluxes from soil of a fallow field in the central piedmont of North Carolina. Atmospheric Environment 28, 1129-1137 https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(94)90290-9
  15. Livingston, G.P., and Hutchinson, G.L., 1995: Enclosurebased measurement of trace gas exchange: Applications and Sources of Error. Biogenic Trace Gases: Measuring Emissions from Soil and Water, P.A. Matson and R.C. Harriss (eds), Blackwell Science Ltd. Osney Mead, Oxford, 14-51
  16. Matson, P.A. and R.C. Harriss, 1988: Prospects for aircraftbased gas exchange measurements in ecosystem studies. Ecology 69(5), 1318-1325 https://doi.org/10.2307/1941629
  17. Matson, P.A. and R.C. Harriss, 1995: Trace gas in an ecosystem context: multiple approaches to measurement and analysis. Biogenic Trace Gases: Measuring Emissions from Soil and Water, P.A. Matson and R.C. Harriss (eds), Blackwell Science Ltd. Osney Mead, Oxford, 1-13
  18. Matthias, A.D., D.N. Yarger, and R.S. Weinbeck, 1978: A numerical evaluation of chamber methods for determining gas fluxes. Geophysical Research Letters 5, 765-768 https://doi.org/10.1029/GL005i009p00765
  19. Parrish, D.D., E.J. Williams, D.W. Fahey, S.C. Liu, and F.C. Fehsenfeld, 1987: Measurement of nitrogen oxide fluxes from soils: Intercomparison of enclosure and gradient Measurement techniques. Journal of Geophysical Research 92, 2165-2171 https://doi.org/10.1029/JD092iD02p02165
  20. Pitts, B.J., and J.N. Pitts, 1986: Atmospheric Chemistry, Wiley Interscience Publication, John Wiley & Sons, New York
  21. Reicosky, D.C., S.W. Wagner, and O.J. Devine, 1990: Methods and calculating of carbon dioxide exchange rates for maize and soybean using a portable chamber. Photosynthetica 24, 22-38
  22. Roelle, P. A., 1996: Chemically Reactive Nitrogen Trace Species in the Planetary Boundary Layer, Master Thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, 1996
  23. Roelle, P., Aneja, V.P., O'Connor, J., Robarge, W. Kim, D.-S., and Levine, J.S., 1999: Measurement of nitrogen oxide emissions from an agricultural soil with a dynamic chamber system. Journal of Geophysical Research 104(D1), 1609-1619 https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD01202
  24. Shepherd, M.F., S. Barzetd, and D.R. Hastie, 1991: The production of atmospheric NOx and $N_2O$ from a fertilized agricultural soil. Atmospheric Environment 25, 1961-1969 https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(91)90277-E
  25. Slemr, F., and W. Seiler, 1991: Field study of environmental variables controlling the NO emissions from soil and the NO compensation point. Journal of Geophysical Research 96, 13017-13031 https://doi.org/10.1029/91JD01028
  26. Smith, K.A., I.P. McTaggart, and H. Tsuruta, 1997: Emissions of $N_2O$ and NO associated with nitrogen fertilization in intensive agriculture, and the potential mitigation. Soil Use and Management 13, 296-304 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.1997.tb00601.x
  27. Sullivan, L.J., 1995: Biogenic Nitric Oxide Emissions: Trends, Seasonal Variations, and Interpretations. Master Thesis, North Carolina State University
  28. Williams, E.J., D.D. Parrish, and F.C. Fehsenfe1d, 1987: Determination of nitrogen oxide emission from soils: Results from a grassland site in Colorado, United States. Journal of Geophysical Research 92, 2173-2179 https://doi.org/10.1029/JD092iD02p02173