Prevalence of Intimal Defect in the Patients urith Surgically Treated Acute Type A Intramural Hematoma of the Aorta

외과적으로 치료한 급성 A형 대동맥벽내 혈종 환자에서 대동맥 내막 결손의 존재 빈도

  • Park, Kay-Hyun (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
  • 박계현 (분당서울대학교병원 흉부외과)
  • Published : 2007.11.05

Abstract

Background: There is a controversy regarding the pathogenesis and management principle of an acute intramural hematoma (IMH) of the aorta, Recent studies have reported intimal defects in many patients diagnosed with IMH, and suggested that intimal defects play important roles in the pathogenesis, progression of the pathology, and prognosis. Material and Method: This study reviewed the preoperative and postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan images of 36 patients who underwent surgical treatment for Stanford type A acute IMH of the aorta. The surgical findings were also reviewed retrospectively from the medical records. Result: In 15 patients (41.7%), the findings suggestive of the intimal defects were found in the preoperative CT. During the operation, 20 patients (72.2%) were found to have small intimal defects in the ascending aorta or the arch, of which 13 patients (50.5%) did not have the CT findings suggestive of intimal defects. In 17 patients, the intimal defects were located in the aortic arch or distal ascending aorta, where a gross examination would have been impossible without total circulatory arrest. In all patients, the intimal defects identified were included in the resected aortic segment, or locally closed. Follow-up CT at 4 months or longer after surgery showed that the IMH in the descending aorta had disappeared or was markedly improved. Conclusion: Most patients undergoing surgical treatment for acute type A IMH had intimal defects. This suggests that a large proportion of IMH might have a similar pathogenic mechanism as classic dissection. Consequently, it is believed that those two entities of acute aortic syndrome should be treat-ed using the same principles.

배경: 급성 대동맥벽내 혈종의 발생 기전과 적절한 치료 방침에 대해서는 아직 논란이 있다. 최근의 연구 결과들은 상당수의 대동맥벽내 혈종 환자에서 내막 결손이 발견됨을 보고하여 왔고 그 존재가 발생 기전, 병변의 변화 및 예후에 중요한 역할을 할 가능성을 제시한다. 그러나 수술을 시행한 환자에서 실제로 내막 결손이 발견되는 빈도에 대한 연구는 아직 없기에 본 연구를 통하여 그 빈도와 양상을 조사하고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법: Stanford A형 급성 대동맥벽내 혈종으로 수술 받은 36명의 환자들을 대상으로 수술 전후 CT 영상 및 판독 결과와 함께 수술 소견을 후향적으로 조사하였다. 결과: 수술 전 CT상 15명(41.7%)에서 내막 결손의 존재를 시사하는 소견이 관찰되었고 수술 중 육안 관찰 결과로는 26명(72.2%)에서 상행 대동맥이나 대동맥궁에서 3 cm미만 크기의 내막 결손이 발견되었다. 특히 CT에서 내막 결손의 존재를 의심할 수 없었던 환자 18명 중 13명(72.2%)에서 수술 시야에서 내막 결손을 확인할 수 있었다. 내막 결손이 발견된 환자 중 17명(65.4%)은 완전 순환 정지하에 대동맥을 절개하였을 때만 육안 확인이 가능한 대동맥궁이나 상행 대동맥 원위부에 결손 부위를 가지고 있었다. 모든 환자에서 육안으로 확인된 내막 결손 부위는 절제 구간에 포함되었고 추적 CT상 수술 후 4개월 이상 경과한 이후에는 모두하행 대동맥 벽의 혈종이 소실되거나 호전되는 소견을 보였다. 결론: 급성 A형 대동맥벽내 혈종으로 수술을 시행 받은 환자 중 80% 이상에서 대동맥 및 주요 분지에 내막 결손이 발견됨을 보여주는 본 연구 결과는 대동맥벽내 혈종의 발생 기전이 내막 파열 결과 발생하는 대동맥 박리증과 동일한 경우가 많을 가능성을 시사한다. 그러므로 급성 대동맥 벽내 혈종을 전형적인 대동맥 박리증과 구별하여 별도의 치료 방침을 적용하기보다는 A형 병변의 경우 급성 대동맥 박리증과 동일한 원칙, 즉 외과적 치료가 우선적으로 고려되어야 한다고 판단된다. 또한 수술 시에는 내막 결손의 존재를 염두에 두고 찾아서 해당 범위를 절제하도록 노력할 필요가 있다고 생각한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Vilacosta I, San Roman JA. Acute aortic syndrome. Heart 2001;85:365-8 https://doi.org/10.1136/heart.85.4.365
  2. Vilacosta I, de Dios RM, Pinto AG. Aortic intramural hematoma during coronary angioplasty: Insights into the pathogenesis of intramedial hemorrhage. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2000;13:403-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0894-7317(00)70010-1
  3. Tittle SL, Lynch RJ, Cole PE, Singh HS, Rizzo JA, Kopf GS, Elefteriades JA. Midterm follow-up of penetrating ulcer and intramural hematoma of the aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;123:1051-9 https://doi.org/10.1067/mtc.2002.121681
  4. Nienaber CA, von Kodolitsch Y, Petersen B, et al. Intramural hemorrhage of the thoracic aorta. Diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Circulation 1995;92:1465-72 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.92.6.1465
  5. von Kodolitsch Y, Csosz SK, Koschyk DH, et al. Intramural hematoma of the aorta. Predictors of progression to dissection and rupture. Circulation 2003;107:1158-63 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000052628.77047.EA
  6. Sohn DW, Jung JW, Oh BH, et al. Should ascending aortic intramural hematoma be treated surgically? Am J Cardiol 2001;87:1024-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(01)01444-8
  7. Song JK, Kim HS, Kang DH, et al. Different clinical features of aortic intramural hematoma versus dissection involving the ascending aorta. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37:1604-10 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(00)01089-5
  8. Shimizu H, Yoshino H, Udagawa H, et al. Prognosis of aortic intramural hemorrhage compared with classic aortic dissection. Am J Cardiol 2000;85:792-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(99)00867-X
  9. Moizumi Y, Komatsu T, Motoyoshi N, Tabayashi K. Management of patients with intramural hematoma involving the ascending aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;124:918-24 https://doi.org/10.1067/mtc.2002.125637
  10. Evangelista A, Mukherjee D, Mehta RH, et al. Acute intramural hematoma of the aorta. A mystery in evolution. Circulation 2005:111;1063-70 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000156444.26393.80
  11. Rubinowitz AN, Krinsky GA, Lee VS. Intramural hematoma of the ascending aorta secondary to descending thoracic aortic penetrating ulcer: findings in two patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2002:26:613-6 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-200207000-00024
  12. Beauchesne LM, Veinot JP, Brais MP, Burwash IG, Chan KL. Acute aortic intimal tear without a mobile flap mimicking an intramural hematoma. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2003;16:285-8 https://doi.org/10.1067/mje.2003.18
  13. Berdat PA, Carrel T. Aortic dissection limited to the ascending aorta mimicking intramural hematoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;15:108-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-7940(98)00259-0
  14. Neri E, Capannini G, Carone E, Diciolla F, Sassi C. Evolution toward dissection of an intramural hematoma of the ascending aorta. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:1855-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(99)01005-X
  15. Sueyoshi E, Matsuoka Y, Imada T, Okimoto T, Sakamoto I, Hayashi K. New development of an ulcerlike projection in aortic intramural hematoma: CT evaluation. Radiology 2002;224:536-41 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2242011009
  16. Ganaha F, Miller DC, Sugimoto K, Do YS, Minamiguchi H, Saito H, Mitchell RS, Date MD. Prognosis of aortic intramural hematoma with and without penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer. A clinical and radiological analysis. Circulation 2002;106:342-8 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000020014.14176.6D
  17. Sueyoshi E, Matsuoka Y, Sakamoto I, Uetani M, Kuniaki H, Narimatsu M. Fate of intramural hematoma of the aorta: CT evaluation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997;21: 931-8 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-199711000-00016
  18. Moizumi Y, Komatsu T, Motoyoshi N, Tabayashi K. Clinical features and long-term outcome of type A and type B intramural hematoma of the aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004:127:421-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.09.016
  19. Park KH, Sung K, Kim K, Jun TG, Lee YT, Park PW. Ascending aorta replacement and local repair of tear site in type A aortic dissection with arch tear. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:1785-91 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(03)00170-X
  20. Saborio DV, Sadeghi A, Burack JH, Lowery RC, Genovesi MH, Brevetti GR. Management of intramural hematoma of the ascending aorta and aortic arch: the risks of limited surgery. Tex Heart Inst J 2003;30:325-7