DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Does the Control of Breathing Help a Dancer to Perform a Smoother Ballet Pour de Bra?

호흡이 Ballet Pour de Bra 동작의 부드러움에 주는 영향

  • Published : 2007.03.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects that breathing, thoracic and abdominal, had on the smoothness while performing ballet pour de bra. Five skilled ballet dancers(age: $24{\pm}1$, height: $163.4{\pm}2.88$, weight: $44.4{\pm}1.34$) with experience of over 10 years participated in this study. Each participant performed the ballet movement three times with abdominal respiration and with thoracic respiration. The kinematic data was recorded at 60 Hz with three digital cameras (Sony VX-2100). The pour de bra movement consists of two phases, up and down. The up phase is defined as the movement from the en bas through the en avant to the en haut. The down phase is defined as the movement from the en haut through the $\grave{a}$ la seconde to the en bas. During these two phases the Jerk Cost (JC) factor was calculated for the shoulder, elbow and wrist to quantify the smoothness. The group who performed the movement while abdominal respiration had a lower JC factor and so it was concluded that while abdominal respiration the smoothness of the movement was increased as opposed to the thoracic respiration.

Keywords

References

  1. 도정임 (1997). 발레클라스. 삼신각.
  2. 김은희 (2006). 발레에서 팔 기본 동작의 운동학적 특성. 한국운동역학회지, 16(1), 151-158. https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2006.16.1.151
  3. 염창홍, 박영훈, 서국웅, 양충모 (2004). 발레 숙련도에 따른 센터에서 Grand Battement Jete a la seconde 동작의 운동학적 비교 분석. 한국운동역학지, 14(2), 153-166.
  4. 류제광 (2002). 기술수준과 목표 거리에 따른 골프 퍼팅 동작의 제어 특성. 교육학석사학위논문, 서울대학교.
  5. Hreljac, A. (1993). The relationship between smoothness and performance during the practice of a lower limb obstacle avoidance task. Biological Cybernetics, 68, 4, 375-379. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00201862
  6. Hreljac, A. (2000). Stride smoothness evaluation of runners and other athletes. Gait and Posture, 11, 199-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(00)00045-X
  7. Nagasaki, H. (1991). Asymmetrical trajectory formation in cyclic forearm movements in man. Experimental Brain Research, 87, 653-661.
  8. Schneider, K., Zernicke, R. F. (1989). Jerk-cost modulations during the practice of rapid arm movements. Biological Cybernetics, 60, 3, 221-230.
  9. Weigner, A. W., Wierzbicka, M. M. (1992). Kinematic models and human elbow flexion movements: Quantitative analysis. Experimental Brain Research, 88, 665-673.
  10. Winstein, C. J., Schmidt, R. A. (1989). Sensorimotor feedback. In D. Holding(eds.) Human Skills. Wiley.
  11. Winter, D. A. (1990). The Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement 2nd. ED. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  12. Zatsiorsky, V. M. (1998). Kinematics of human motion. Human Kinetics, 207.

Cited by

  1. The Analysis of Differences in Pulmonary Functions, Jerk Cost, and Ground Reaction Force Depending on Professional and Amateur Dancers in Korea Dance vol.24, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2014.24.4.349
  2. Correlation Analysis between Dance Experience and Smoothness of Dance Movement by Using Three Jerk-Based Quantitative Methods vol.26, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2016.26.1.1