DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Mechanical Behavior of the Soleus Aponeuroses during Voluntary Contraction Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technique

자기공명 영상기법을 이용한 인체 가자미근 건막의 기계학적 특성 연구

  • Lee, Hae-Dong (BK21 Mechatronics Group, Chungnam National University)
  • 이해동 (충남대학교, BK21 메카트로닉스 사업단)
  • Published : 2007.03.31

Abstract

Muscle force produced by muscle fibers is transmitted to bones via tendinous structures(aponeuroses and tendon), resulting in joint(s) movement. As force-transmitting elements, mechanical behavior of aponeuroses and tendon are closely related with the function of muscle-tendon complex. The purpose of this study was to determine strain characteristics of aponeuroses for in-vivo human soleus muscle during submaximal voluntary contractions using an advanced medical imaging technique, velocity-encoded phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (VE-PC MRI). VE-PC MRI of the soleus muscle-tendon complex was acquired during submaximal isometric plantarflexion contraction-relaxation cycle (n = 7), using 3.0T Trio MRI scanner(Siemens AG, Malvern, MA). From the VE-PC MRI containing the tissue velocity in superior-inferior direction, twenty regions of interest(20 ROI; 10 on the anterior aponeurosis and 10 on the posterior aponeurosis) were tracked. During the isometric plantarflexion contraction-relaxation cycle, velocity and displacement profiles were different between the anterior and posterior aponeuroses, indicating heterogeneous strain behavior along the length of the leg. The anterior aponeurosis elongated while the posterior aponeurosis shortened during the initial phase of the contraction. Moreover, strain behavior of the posterior aponeurosis was different from that of the Achilles tendon. Possible explanation for the observed variations in strain behavior of aponeuroses was investigated with morphological assessment of the soleus muscle and it was found that the intramuscular tendinous structures significantly vary among subjects. In conclusion, the heterogeneous mechanical behavior of the soleus aponeuroses and the Achilles tendon suggests that the complexity of skeletal muscle-tendon complex should be taken into consideration when modeling the complex for better understanding of its functions.

Keywords

References

  1. Alexander R. M. (2002). Tendon elasticity and muscle function. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A Molecular Integrative Physiology 133, 1001-1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1095-6433(02)00143-5
  2. Arampatzis A., Morey-Klapsing G., Karamanidis K., DeMonte G., Stafilidis S., & Bruggemann G. P. (2005). Differences between measured and resultant joint moments during isometric contractions at the ankle joint. Journal of Biomechanics 38, 885-892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.04.027
  3. Finni T., Hodgson J. A., Lai A. M., Edgerton V. R., & Sinha S. (2003). Nonuniform strain of human soleus aponeurosis-tendon complex during submaximal voluntary contractions in vivo. Journal of Applied Physiology 95, 829-837.
  4. Gordon A. M., Huxley A. F., & Julian F. J. (1966). The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres. Journal of Physiology 184, 170-192. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007909
  5. Hill A. V. (1938). The heat of shortening and the dynamic constants of muscle. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 126, 136-195. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1938.0050
  6. Huijing P. A. & Woittiez R. D. (1984). The effect of architecture on skeletal-muscle performance - a simple planimetric model. Netherlands Journal of Zoology 34, 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1163/002829684X00029
  7. Huxley A. F. (1957). Muscle structure and theories of contraction. Progress in Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry 7, 255-318.
  8. Huxley A. F. & Simmons R. M. (1971). Proposed mechanism of force generation in striated muscle. Nature 233, 533-538. https://doi.org/10.1038/233533a0
  9. Magnusson S. P., Aagaard P., Dyhre-Poulsen P., & Kjaer M. (2001). Load-displacement properties of the human triceps surae aponeurosis in vivo. Journal of Physiology 531, 277-288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0277j.x
  10. Muramatsu T., Muraoka T., Takeshita D., Kawakami Y., Hirano Y., & Fukunaga T. (2001). Mechanical properties of tendon and aponeurosis of human gastrocnemius muscle in vivo. Journal of Applied Physiology 90, 1671-1678.
  11. Muraoka T., Muramatsu T., Takeshita D., Kawakami Y., & Fukunaga T. (2002). Length Change of Human Gastrocnemius Aponeurosis and Tendon during Passive Joint Motion. Cells Tissues Organs 171 , 260-268. https://doi.org/10.1159/000063128
  12. Pelc L. R., Sayre J., Yun K., Castro L. J., Herfkens RJ, Miller DC, & Pelc NJ (1994). Evaluation of myocardial motion tracking with cine-phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging. Investigative Radiology 29, 1038-1042. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-199412000-00005
  13. Sinha S., Hodgson J. A., Finni T., Lai A. M., Grinstead J., & Edgerton V. R. (2004). Muscle kinematics during isometric contraction: development of phase contrast and spin tag techniques to study healthy and atrophied muscles. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 20, 1008-1019. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20210
  14. Trestik C. L. & Lieber R. L. (1993). Relationship between Achilles tendon mechanical properties and gastrocnemius muscle function. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 115, 225-230. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2895479
  15. Zuurbier C. J., Everard A. J., van der W. P., & Huijing P. A. (1994). Length-force characteristics of the aponeurosis in the passive and active muscle condition and in the isolated condition. Journal of Biomechanics 27, 445-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(94)90020-5