Korean Journal of Applied Biomechanics (한국운동역학회지)

Korean Society of Applied Biomechanics (한국운동역학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Kinematical Analysis of the Back Somersault in Floor Exercise

마루운동 제자리 뒤공중돌기 동작의 운동학적 분석

  • Published : 2007.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was to compare the major kinematic factors between the success and failure group on performing the back somersault motion in floor exercise. Three gymnasts(height : $167.3{\pm}2.88cm$, age : $22.0{\pm}1.0years$, body weight : $64.4{\pm}2.3kg$) were participated in this study. The kinematic data was recorded at 60Hz with four digital video camera. Two successful motions and failure motions for each subject were selected for three dimensional analysis. 1. Success Trail It was appear that success trail was larger than failure group in projection velocity, but success trail was smaller than failure trail in projection angle. Also it was appear that success trail was longer than failure group in the time required. Hand segment velocity and maximum velocity in success trail were larger than those in failure trail, and this result was increasing the projection velocity and finally increasing the vertical height of center of mass. At the take-off(event 2), flection amount of hip and knee joint angle was contributed to the optimal condition for the take-off and at the peak point, hip and knee joint angle was maximum flexed for reducing the moment of inertia. Also in this point, upper extremities of success trail extended more than those of failure trail. in this base, success trail in upward phase(p3) 2. Failure Trail It was appear that failure trail was smaller than success trail in projection velocity, but failure trail was larger than success trail in projection angle. Also it was appear that failure trail was more short than success trail in the time required. Hand segment velocity and maximum velocity in failure trail were smaller than those in success trail, and this result was reducing the projection velocity and finally reducing the vertical high of center of mass. At the take-off(event 2), flection amount of hip and knee joint angle wasn't contributed to the optimal condition for the take-off and at the peak point, hip and knee joint angle wasn't maximum flexed for reducing the moment of inertia. Also in this point, upper extremities of failure trail didn't extended more than those of success trail.

Keywords

References

  1. 강상학(1999). 체조 겹틀어 뒤 공중돌기의 운동학적 분석. 한국체육학회지, 제 38권, 3호, pp.653-663.
  2. 김상복, 진영완(1995). 뒤공중돌기 동작의 운동역학적 분석. 한국체육학회지, 제34권, 제 2호, pp. 415-425.
  3. 김영란(2002). 지도자를 위한 체조. 서울: 도서출판홍경.
  4. 김영란, 이연종, 윤희중(1993). 마루운동에서의 앞공중돌기에 대한 운동역학적 분석. 한국체육대학교부설체육과학연구소논문집, 제12권, 1호, pp. 83-89.
  5. 김영란(2001). 평균대 오르기 과정의 운동역학적 변인이 공중돌기 국면에 미치는 영향. 한국체육대학교대학원 박사학위논문.
  6. 김주선, 유원종, 이기태(1996). 체조 경기 중 제자리 손짚고 뒤돌기(flic-flac) 동작의 운동역학적 분석. 한국체육학회지, 제 35권 제 1호. pp.346-353.
  7. 류지선, 한충식(1994). 뒤 공중 돌아내리기 동작의 운동학적 특성비교. 한국체육대학교부설체육과학연구소논문집, 제13권, 1호, pp. 143-155.
  8. 양동영(2003). 농구 자유투 동작시 상지분절의 각운동량 전이 분석. 한국운동역학회지, 제 13권, 1호, pp.185-204. https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2003.13.1.185
  9. 이순호, 정철정, 신성휴, 강성철(1998). 좌표변환 방법에 의한 분절의 각운동량 방정식 유도. 한국운동역학회지, 제 8권, 2호, pp.43-56.
  10. 이용식, 이정식(1995). 평행봉의 뒤공중돌아 물구나무서기 동작분석. 한국체육학회지, 제 34권 3호, pp.354-362.
  11. 임비오, 안승현, 이상우, 도인영(2007). 보행시작과 멈추는 거리가 보행변인에 미치는 영향. 한국운동역학회지, 제 17권 1호, 17-27. https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2007.17.1.017
  12. 조태호, 주영삼(1995). 이단평행봉 뒤 공중돌아 내리기 동작의 운동학적 분석. 체육학논문집, 제 23집, pp. 317-331.
  13. 한윤수(1997). 철봉 뒤휘돌기 유형에 따른 내리기 동작의 운동학적 특성. 한국체육대학교대학원석사학위논문.
  14. 황인승, 이성철(1987). 우수체조 선수의 마루운동 시 3차원 각운동량 결정. 연세논총, pp. 299-313.
  15. Abdel-Aziz, Y. I & Kaararah, M(1971). Direct linear transformation from comparator coordinates into object space coordinates in close-range photogrammetry. Im: Proceed -ings of the ASP/UI Symposium on Close Range Photogrammetry. Falls church, VA : American Society of Photogrammetry. pp. 1-18.
  16. Bruggemann Gert-Perter, Cheetham, Phillip J, Alp, Yilmaz, & Arampatais, Diamantis(1994). Approach to a biomechanics profile of dismount and release-release-regrasp skills of the high bar. Journal of applied biomechanics, pp. 291-312.
  17. F. I. G.(2002). Code of points artistic gymnastics for man. Switzerland.
  18. Hamill, J., & Knutzen, K.M.(2003). Biomechanical Basis of Human Movement. U.S : Williams & Wilkins.
  19. Hay. J. G.(1978). The Biomechanics of sport techniques.Englewood Cliffs NJ:Prentice- Hall.
  20. Kerwin, Davis G, Yeadon, Maurice R, & Harwood, M. J.(1993). High bar release in triple somersault dismount. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 9, pp. 279-280.
  21. Mcnitt-gray, Jill L, Takashi, Yokoi & Carl, Millward(1994). Landing strategies used by gymnasts on different surfaces. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 10, pp. 237-252.
  22. Nicol, A.C., & Watkin, J.(1990). Biomechanics analysis of somersault activities. International Series on Biomechanics, X-B Vol, 6B. pp.673-677.
  23. Payne, A.H., & Barker, P.(1976). Comparison of the take-off force in flic flac and the back somersault in gymnastics. International Series on Biomechanics, Vol, 1B. pp.314-321.
  24. Winifred A. W., Eugene W. B., Charles X. W., & Robert W.(1996). Kinematic and Kinetic Analysis of the Over grip Giant Swing on the Uneven Parallel Bars. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 12, 431-448.
  25. Tylkowsky, C.M., Simon, S.R., &Mansour, J.M.(1982). Internal rotation gait in spastic cerebral palsy in the hip. Proceedings of the 10th Open Scientific Meeting of the Hip Socity, (Edited by Nelson, J.P.), 89-125. Mosby, St. Louis.
  26. Zatsiorsky, V.M., Selnyanov, V.N., & Chugunova, L.(1990). In vivo body segment inertia parameters determination using a gamnar scanner method. Biomechanics of human movement ; Application in Rehabilitation, Sports and ergonomics, pp.187-202. Worthiagton, OH : Bertec corporation.

Cited by

  1. Kinetic Analysis of the Salto Side-Ward Tucked on the Balance Beam vol.18, pp.3, 2008, https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2008.18.3.061