DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of Site Classification System and Modification of Design Response Spectra Considering Geotechnical Characteristics in Korea

  • 김동수 (한국과학기술원 건설 및 환경공학과) ;
  • 윤종구 (한국유지관리 주식회사 지반설계사업부)
  • Published : 2007.08.31

Abstract

Site response analyses were performed based on equivalent linear technique using shear wave velocity profiles of 162 sites collected around the Korean peninsula. The site characteristics, particularly the shear wave velocities and the depth to the bedrock, are compared to those in the western United States. The results show that the site-response coefficients based on the mean shear velocity of the top 30m ($V_{S30}$) suggested in the current code underestimates the motion in short-period ranges and overestimates the motion in mid-period ranges. The current Korean code based on UBC is required to be modified considering site characteristics in Korea for the reliable estimation of site amplification. From the results of numerical estimations, new regression curves were derived between site coefficients ($F_{a}\;and\;F_{v}$) and the fundamental site periods, and site coefficients were grouped based on site periods with reasonable standard deviations compared to site classification based on $V_{S30}$. Finally, new site classification system and modification of design response spectra are recommended considering geotechnical characteristics in Korea.

Keywords

References

  1. NEHRP, 'Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulation for New Buildings,' FEMA 222A/223A, May, Vol. 1 (Provisions) and Vol. 2 (Commentary), 1994
  2. NEHRP, 'Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulation for New Buildings and Other Structures,' FEMA 302/303, February, Part I. (Provisions) and Part. 2 (Commentary), 1997
  3. ICBO, '1997 Uniform building code,' Volume 2 - Structural engineering design provisions, International Conference of Building Officials, 1997, pp. 492
  4. CEN (Comite Europeen de Normalisaton), 'prEN 1998-1-Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance Part I : General Rule, seismic actions and rules for buildings,' DRAFT No 3, Doc CEN/TC250/SC8/N288, May 2001, Brussels
  5. Ministry of Construction and Transportation (MOCT). Seismic Design Guide, 1997
  6. MCEER-99-0010, 'Site Factors and Site Categories in Seismic Codes', Ricardo Dobry, Ricardo Ramos and Maurice S, Power. July 19, 1999
  7. Bardet, J.P., Nielsen, E., Villacorta, R., 1998. ROSRINE data dissemination. http://geoinfo.usc.edu/rosrine. Accessed 12 June 2001
  8. Sun, C.G., 'Geotechnical information system and site amplification characteristics for earthquake ground motions at inland of the Korean Peninsula'. Ph. D. Dissertation, Seoul Nation University. Feb. 2004
  9. Schnabel, P. B., Lysmer, J., and Seed, H. B (1972), 'SHAKE: a computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites,' Report EERC 72-12, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley
  10. Idriss, I. M., and Sun, J, I. User's manual for SHAKE91: A computer program for conducting equivalent linear seismic response analysis of horizontally layered soil deposits, University of California, Davis, 1992, 13pp http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/search.html
  11. D.S.Kim and Y.W. Choo, 'Dynamic Deformation Characteristics of Cohesionless Soils in Korea Using Resonant Column Tests', Journal of Korean Geotechnical Society. Vol. 17, No. 5, 2001, pp. 115-128
  12. Dobry, R. et, al. 'Development of Site-Dependent Ratio of Elastic Response Spectra (RRS)', Proceeding of the Workshop on Earthquake Site Response and Seismic Code Provisions, 1999
  13. Roger D. Borcherdt, 'Emperical Evidence for Site Coefficients in Building Code Provisions', Earthquake Spectra, Volume 18. No. 2, May 2002, pp. 189-217 https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1486243