DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Integrated Watershed Modeling Under Uncertainty

불확실성을 고려한 통합유역모델링

  • Published : 2007.07.31

Abstract

The uncertainty in water quality model predictions is inevitably high due to natural stochasticity, model uncertainty, and parameter uncertainty. An integrated modeling system under uncertainty was described and demonstrated for use in watershed management and receiving-water quality prediction. A watershed model (HSPF), a receiving water quality model (WASP), and a wetland model (NPS-WET) were incorporated into an integrated modeling system (modified-BASINS) and applied to the Hwaseong Reservoir watershed. Reservoir water quality was predicted using the calibrated integrated modeling system, and the deterministic integrated modeling output was useful for estimating mean water quality given future watershed conditions and assessing the spatial distribution of pollutant loads. A Monte Carlo simulation was used to investigate the effect of various uncertainties on output prediction. Without pollution control measures in the watershed, the concentrations of total nitrogen (T-N) and total phosphorous (T-P) in the Hwaseong Reservoir, considering uncertainty, would be less than about 4.8 and 0.26 mg 4.8 and 0.26 mg $L^{-1}$, respectively, with 95% confidence. The effects of two watershed management practices, a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) and a constructed wetland (WETLAND), were evaluated. The combined scenario (WWTP + WETLAND) was the most effective at improving reservoir water quality, bringing concentrations of T-N and T-P in the Hwaseong Reservoir to less than 3.54 and 0.15 mg ${L^{-1}$, 26.7 and 42.9% improvements, respectively, with 95% confidence. Overall, the Monte Carlo simulation in the integrated modeling system was practical for estimating uncertainty and reliable in water quality prediction. The approach described here may allow decisions to be made based on probability and level of risk, and its application is recommended.

Keywords

References

  1. Annan, J. D., 2001, Modelling under uncer-uncertainty: Monte Carlo methods for temporally varying parameters, Ecol. Modelling, 136, pp.297-302 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00413-0
  2. Beck, M. B., 1987, Water quality modeling: A review of the analysis of uncertainty, Wat. Resour. Res., 23(8), pp.1393-1442 https://doi.org/10.1029/WR023i008p01393
  3. Eckhardt, K., L. Breuer and H. Frede, 2003, Parameter uncertainty and the significance of simulated land use change effects, J. Hydrol., 273, pp.164-176 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00395-5
  4. Ham, J. H., 2005, Nonpoint source pollution control using constructed wetlands and integrated watershed modelling, PhD dissertation, Department of Rural Engineering, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea
  5. He, C., C. Shi, C. Yang and B. P. Agosti, 2001, A windows-based GIS-AGNPS interface, Journal of The American Water Resources Association, 37, pp.395-406 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2001.tb00977.x
  6. Jung, P. J., H. S. Goh, M. H. Hyun and E. J. Lee, 2004, Water quality management using WASP5 & WASP builder for a basin of an agricultural reservoir, J. of KSWQ, 20(5), pp.422-431
  7. Mitsch, W. J. and J. G. Gosselink, 2000, Wetlands, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA
  8. Sornlyody L. and R. Wets, 1988, Stochastic optimization models for lake eutrophication management, Oper. Res., 36(5), pp.660-681 https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.36.5.660
  9. USEPA, 1997, Compendium of tools for watershed assessment and TMDL development, EPA 841-B-97-006, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., USA
  10. USEPA, 2001, Better Assessment Science Integrating Point and Nonpoint Sources(BASINS) version 3.0 user's manual, EPA 823-8-01001, Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., USA
  11. Yoon, C. G., 1994, Uncertainty analysis in stream water quality modeling, Ph.D. dissertation, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
  12. Yoon, C. G. and J. H. Ham, 2000, Prediction of water quality in estuarine reservoir using SWMM and WASP5, Korean J. of Environ. Eng., 19(3), pp.252-258