A Missile Guidance Law Based on Sontag's Formula to Intercept Maneuvering Targets

  • Ryoo, Chang-Kyung (Department of Aerospace Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Kim, Yoon-Hwan (Department of Aerospace Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)) ;
  • Tahk, Min-Jea (Department of Aerospace Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)) ;
  • Choi, Kee-Young (Department of Aerospace Engineering, Inha University)
  • Published : 2007.08.31

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a nonlinear guidance law for missiles against maneuvering targets. First, we derive the equations of motion described in the line-of-sight reference frame and then we define the equilibrium subspace of the nonlinear system to guarantee target interception within a finite time. Using Sontag's formula, we derive a nonlinear guidance law that always delivers the state to the equilibrium subspace. If the speed of the missile is greater than that of the target, the proposed law has global capturability in that, under any initial launch conditions, the missile can intercept the maneuvering target. The proposed law also minimizes the integral cost of the control energy and the weighted square of the state. The performance of the proposed law is compared with the augmented proportional navigation guidance law by means of numerical simulations of various initial conditions and target maneuvers.

Keywords

References

  1. D. E. Kirk, Optimal Control Theory - An Introduction, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1970
  2. A. E. Bryson Jr. and Y. C. Ho, Applied Optimal Control-Optimization, Estimation, and Control, Hemisphere, Washington, DC, 1975
  3. H. Cho, C. K. Ryoo, and M. J. Tahk, 'Closed-form optimal guidance law for missiles of time-varying velocity,' Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 1017-1022, 1996 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.21740
  4. J. Z. Ben-Asher and I. Yaesh, Advances in Missile Guidance Theory, AIAA Inc., Washington, DC, 1998
  5. C. K. Ryoo, H. Cho, and M. J. Tahk, 'Optimal guidance laws with terminal impact angle constraint,' Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 724-732, 2005 https://doi.org/10.2514/1.8392
  6. K. B. Kim, M. J. Kim, and J. W. Choi, 'Modified receding horizon guidance law with information on small accurate time-to-go,' IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 725-729, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1109/7.845274
  7. D. Zhou, C. Mu, and W. Xu, 'Adaptive sliding-mode guidance of a homing missile,' Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 589-594, 1999 https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4421
  8. M. Guelman, 'The closed-form solution of the true proportional navigation,' IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 472-482, 1976 https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.1976.308328
  9. C. D. Yang, F. B. Yeh, and J. H. Chen, 'The closed-form solution of generalized proportional navigation,' Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 216-218, 1987 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20205
  10. K. Becker, 'Closed-form solution of pure proportional navigation,' IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 526-533, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1109/7.106131
  11. P. J. Yuan and J. S. Chern, 'Solutions of true proportional navigation for maneuvering and non-maneuvering Targets,' Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 268-271, 1992 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20828
  12. A. Chakravarthy and D. Goshe, 'Capturability of realistic generalized true proportional navigation,' IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 407-418, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1109/7.481281
  13. J. H. Oh and I. J Ha, 'Capturability of the 3-dimensonal pure PNG law,' IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 491-503, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1109/7.766931
  14. C. K. Ryoo, Y. H. Kim, and M. J. Tahk, 'Capturability analysis of PN laws using Lyapunov stability theory,' Proc. of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Providence, USA, pp. 2004-4883, August 2004
  15. V. Garver, 'Optimum intercept laws for accelerating targets,' AIAA Journal, vol. 6, pp. 2196-2198, 1968 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.4962
  16. P. Zarchan, Tactical and Strategic Missile Guidance, 4th ed., AIAA Inc., Washington, 2002
  17. C. D. Yang and H. Y. Chen, 'Three-dimensional nonlinear $H_{\infty}$ guidance law,' International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 109-129, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.552
  18. Z. Artstein, 'Stabilization with relaxed controls,' Nonlinear Analysis, vol. 7, pp. 1163-1173, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1016/0362-546X(83)90049-4
  19. E. D. Sontag, 'A 'universal' construction of Artstein's theorem on nonlinear stabilization,' Systems & Control Letters, vol. 13, pp. 117-123, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6911(89)90028-5
  20. R. A. Freeman and P. V. Kokotovic, 'Inverse optimality in robust stabilization,' SIAM Journal of Control and Optimization, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1365-1391, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1137/S0363012993258732
  21. R. A. Freeman and J. A. Primbs, 'Control Lyapunov functions: New ideas from an old source,' Proc. of the 35th Conference on Decision and Control, Kobe, Japan, pp. 3926-3931, December 1996
  22. J. A. Primbs, V. Nevistic, and J. C. Doyle, 'Nonlinear optimal control: A control Lyapunov function and receding horizon perspective,' Asian Journal of Control, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 12-24, 1999
  23. P. Gurfil, 'Non-linear missile guidance synthesis using control Lyapunov functions,' Proc. IMechE Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, vol. 219, pp. 77-87, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1243/095441005X9085
  24. S. H. Song and I. J. Ha, ' A Lyapunov approach to performance analysis of 3-dimensinal PNG laws,' IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 238-248, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1109/7.250424
  25. F. Imado and S. Uehara, 'High-g barrel roll maneuvers against proportional navigation from optimal control viewpoint,' Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 876-881, 1998 https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4351