A Study on Environmental Impact Assessment System of Seoul City

서울시 환경영향평가 제도에 대한 연구

  • Kim, Im-Soon (Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Kwangwoon University) ;
  • Han, Sang-Wook (Kwangwoon Strategic Environmental Assessment Institute)
  • 김임순 (광운대학교 환경대학원) ;
  • 한상욱 (광운전략환경평가연구소)
  • Received : 2007.10.09
  • Accepted : 2007.11.26
  • Published : 2007.12.30

Abstract

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is a kind of planning technique to seek ways to minimize environmental impact, a scheme to encourage sustainable development. With the launch of the Ministry of Environment in 1980, the EIA was introduced in Korea. Its full operation was initially driven by regulations on documenting EIA reports in 1981, which was piloted as a decision-making scheme where final decision were made at the development department after considering opinions suggested by the Ministry of Environment. At that time, dominance of the economic logic overwhelmed environ-friendly opinions, but thanks to the fourth revision of the Environmental Conservation Law in 1986, private projects came to be included on the EIA list. This was a turning point for the EIA to become a regulatory system. Local governments are also conducting the EIA regardless of the national-level EIA. In order to prevent and resolve increasingly severe environmental problems in Seoul in advance due to various construction projects, the Seoul Metropolitan Government, for the first time as a local government in Korea, legislated city decrees to introduce the EIA which has been underway from September 1, 2002. In particular, the Seoul government, unlike the Ministry of Environment, has included construction works on the list of evaluation projects, adopting the scoping and screen procedure scheme. In addition, complementing operational setbacks, the city government has revised and implemented decrees and enforcement laws on the Impact Assessment on Environment, Transportation and Disasters by shortening the consultation period, eliminating the submission of reports on construction, and expanding the waiver requirements in consultation over the reports. Therefore, development measures for the EIA scheme of the Seoul Metropolitan Government will be the target of the research. To that end, the up-to-date data of the Ministry of Environment, the Seoul government and local governments was collected, and latest materials from the EU, previous research and the Internet were gathered for analyses. By doing so, the flow of the EIA was reviewed, and the EIA schemes of local governments under the national EIA were analyzed. Furthermore, based on the Seoul government's recent data on the EIA based on the decrees, the background and legislation of the Seoul government's EIA were analyzed along with the developments for the environmental organizations. Setbacks were derived from the implementation period, evaluation procedures, consultation period and details of the EIA, and corresponding development measures were proposed.

Keywords

References

  1. 김임순,한상욱,2005,대안적 환경평가 시스템 연구; 통합적 의사결정을 위한 새로운 개념의 영향평가모형의 국내 적용방안 탐색,환경영향평가학회지,14 (4),179-193
  2. 김임순외,2003, 최신환경영향평가,동화기술,pp225-238
  3. 서울시,2001, 환경영향평가제도 운영지침,환경부 예규,210
  4. 조영호,2006,서울시 환경영향평가제도 운영 및 성과,환경영향평가심의위원회 워크숍,pp1-3
  5. 조영호,2007, 환경영향평가심의 운영성과 보고,서울시 환경 영향평가심의위원회 워크숍,pp3-6
  6. 최준규,2007, 환경영향평가제도의 원리와 현안항목 검토,서울시 환경영향평가심의위원회워크숍,pp59-68
  7. 환경부,2005,환경정책기본법 시행령 일부 개정령안 입법예고,환경부
  8. 환경부,2006,환경 교통 재해 등에 관한 영향평가법 시행령 개정 공포,환경부
  9. 환경부훔페이지,www.me.go.kr
  10. Bjorn Lomborg, 2004, Global Crises, Global Solutions, Cambridge University Press. pp129-150
  11. http://www.seoul.go.kr/seoul/citynews/newsdata/1224795_8736.html 서울시청 사이트
  12. IAIA, 2002b, The Linkages Between Impact Assessment and the Sustainable Development Agenda, and Recommendations for Actions, pp.1-12
  13. Larry Canter and Barry Sadler, 1997, A Tool kit for effective eia practice--Review of Methods and Perspectives on their Application. IAIA. pp. 5-40
  14. UNEP, 2004, Environmental Impact Assessment and Strategic Environmental Assessment:Towards an Integrated Approach, pp.1-147