Determining Values of Design Parameters for a Rail Transportation Terminal in a Container Port

컨테이너 항만의 철도 운송 터미널 설계변수 결정

  • Jeong, Bong-Joo (Department of Industrial Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Lee, Byung-Kwon (Department of Industrial Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Kap-Hwan (Department of Industrial Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Seo, Jung-Hun (Research Center for Ubiquitous Port Logistics Technology, Pusan National University) ;
  • Park, Soon-Oh (VMS Solutions Co., Ltd.)
  • 정봉주 (부산대학교 산업공학과) ;
  • 이병권 (부산대학교 산업공학과) ;
  • 김갑환 (부산대학교 산업공학과) ;
  • 서정훈 (부산대학교 유비쿼터스항만물류기술연구센터) ;
  • 박순오 ((주)브이엠에스솔루션스)
  • Received : 20061100
  • Accepted : 20070400
  • Published : 2007.12.31

Abstract

Rail transportation terminals play an important role in inland transportation systems, because the operation productivity in the terminals significantly influences the efficiency of the whole transportation systems. This paper addresses a design method of a real rail terminal that satisfies a pre-specified throughput capacity. In order to construct high performance rail terminal, it is shown how design parameters can be estimated systematically. Examples of the design parameters are the number of transshipment tracks, the number of rail cranes, and the number of internal trucks. These design parameters are estimated by using simple equations and the validity of the values of these parameters are tested by using simulation. Furthermore, some iterative correction procedure, which uses the simulation technique and the equations alternately, are proposed.

Keywords

References

  1. Alicke, K. (2002), Modeling and optimization of the intermodal terminal Mega Hub, OR Spectrum, 24(1),1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s291-002-8197-3
  2. Amorld, P., Peelers, D., and Thomas, I, (2004), Modeling a rail/road intermodal transportation system, Trdnsportatin Researcb, Part E, 40(3),255-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2003.08.005
  3. Bauis, A, and Gollas, J. (2002), Comparative evaluation of existing and innovative rail-road freight transport termlnals, Trdnsportatin Researcb, Part A , 36(7),593-611.
  4. Bontekoning,Y.M. (2002),Towards new-generation terminal operations: identifying inplementation obstacles, The Netherlands TRAlL Research School Reports in Transportation Planmng.
  5. Bontekoning, Y. M., and Kreulzberger, E, (1999), Concepts of new,-generation terminal and terminal nodes, The Netherlands TRAlL Research School Reports in Transportation Planmng.
  6. Bontekoning, Y. M., and Kreutzberger, E. (2001), New-generation terminals: a performance evaluation study, The Netherlands TRAlL Research School Reports in Transportation Planning
  7. Bontekonlng, Y, M, ,Macharis, C., and Trip, J. J. (2004), Is a new applied transportation research field emerglng?-A review of intermodal rail-truck freight transport literature, Transportation Reserch Part A, 38(1),1-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(02)00074-7
  8. Corry, P. and Kozan, E. (2006), A decision Support System for intermodal train plannlng, Proceedings of the Second International Intelligent Logistics systems Conference, February 22-23, Marriott Hotel Brisbane & Port of BrlSbane Corporation, Brisbane, Australia.
  9. Knacilo, E, M. and Verbraeck, A.( 2006), Simulation Services to suppor the control design of rail infrastructures, Proceedings of the 2006 Winter Simulation Conference, December 3-6, 2006, Portola Plaza Hotel, Monterey,Californla, USA.
  10. Korea Contalner Terminal Authority (2006), Trend and Andlysis on Container Freight Flows in 2005, Korea Container Terminal Authorlty Web Site, 8-30.
  11. Kozan, E. (2000), Optimising container transfers at multimodal terminals, Mathematical and Computer Modelling,31(11),235-243 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-7177(00)00092-3