AHP를 이용한 프로젝트 선정에 관한 실증적 연구

An Study on Project Selection based on Analytic Hierarchy Process

  • 김주완 (금오공과대학교 산업경영학과) ;
  • 이욱기 (금오공과대학교 산업경영학과) ;
  • 김판수 (경북대학교 경영학부)
  • 발행 : 2007.04.30

초록

The purpose of this study is to explore the applicability of AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) to select more productive projects among various proposed projects in a particular company. To achieve this research objective, the characteristics of project evaluation and selection are first reviewed with respect to when, where, and how the decision is made. Then the theoretical basis of the AHP is briefly reviewed along with its mathematical underpinnings to construct the framework of project evaluation and selection. To be more specific, the evaluation and selection criteria were reorganized in the AHP-based framework to make the process of project evaluation and selection more productive. Project evaluation and selection is one of the most important activities for the most companies to be more advantageous in the market. Despite the importance of decision making process of project selection, not many of how to choose the best project were suggested as the reliable project selection methods in the industries. It may be because it involves various activities related to conflict resolution among different evaluation criteria, high uncertainties of market, and the unclear tradeoff among various project objectives. Furthermore, the decision, once made at this point, tends to be irrevocable until the whole process turns out to be a complete success or failure. As the result, the AHP method showed better financial performance rather than the traditional method in a case study.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김진영, "연구개발 프로젝트 선정을 위한 계층적 분석(AHP)과 목표계획법(GP)의 혼용 접근방법", 석사학위논문, 충북대학교, 1999
  2. 변대호, "AHP를 이용한 가상쇼핑몰 평가", 한국학술진흥재단, 경성대학교, 1999
  3. 권철신, 조근태, 홍순욱 역, 리더를 위한 의사결정, 동현출판사, 2000
  4. Albala, A., "Stage Approach for the Evaluation and Selection of R&D Projects", IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag., EM22(4)(1975), pp.153-163, Nov
  5. Cooper, R. G., "Indentifying Industrial New Product Success: Project New Product", Industrial Marketing Management, 8(1979), pp.124-135, 1979 https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-8501(79)90052-X
  6. Cooper, R. G., "A Process Model for Industrial New Product Development", IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag.,EM30(1)(1983), pp.2-11, Feb
  7. Dobler, D.W. and Burt, D.N., "Purchasing and Supply Management: Text and Case", 6th ed, New York, Mcgraw-Hill, 1996
  8. Dyer, J.S., "Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process", Management Science, 33(3)(1990), pp.249-258
  9. Dyer, R.F. and Forman, E.H., "Group Decision Support with the Analytic Hierarchy Process", Decision Support System, 8(1992), pp.99-124 https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9236(92)90003-8
  10. Hogarth, R., "Judgement and Choice", Willy, New York, 1987
  11. Holloman, Charles R. and Hendrick, Hal W., "Adequacy of Group Decisions as a Function of the Decision-Making Process", Academy of Management journal, v.15 no.2(1972), pp.175-184 https://doi.org/10.2307/254909
  12. Janis, I.L., "Groupthink Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes Boston", MA.: Houghton Mifflin, 1983
  13. Liberatore, M. J. and Titus, G. J., "The Practice of Management Science in R&D Project Management", Management Science, 29(8)(1983), pp.962-974 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.8.962
  14. Montgomery D. B. and Urban, G. L., "Screening New Product Possibilities", Management Science in Marketing, (1969), pp.303-312
  15. Saaty, T.L., "The Analytic Hierarchy Process", McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980
  16. Saaty, T.L., "Decision Making for Leaders, Lifetime Learning Publications", Belmont, California, 1982
  17. Saaty, T.L. and Alexander, J.M., "Conflict Resolution, Praeger", New York, 1989
  18. Wanous, John P. and Youtz, Margaret A., "Solution Diversity and the Qualityof Group Decisions", Academy of Management journal, v.29 no.1(1986), pp.149-159 https://doi.org/10.2307/255866