DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Study of Dry Matter Yield and Nutritive Value of Mixtures on the Different Grass Species and Seeding Rates

초종과 파종비율을 달리한 혼파초지의 건물수량과 품질 비교 연구

  • Published : 2007.06.30

Abstract

The object of this experiment was to investigate the effect of mixture which consist of different seeding rates and species on dry matter yield and quality in Daejon area. The field trials were conducted from 2003 to 2005 at Chungnam National University in order to evaluate the dry matter yield and quality of different mixture. The experimental design includes three mixture types: Conventional mixtures, CM{orchardgrass(Potomac) 50% + tall fescue (Fawn)20% + Kentucky bluegrass(Kenblue) 20% + white clover(Regal) 10%}, red clover + mixtures, RM{orchardgrass(Potomac) 40% + tall fescue(Fawn) 20% + Kentucky bluegrass(Kenblue) 10% + red clover(Kenland) 30%) and Turf type grass + mixtures, TM {orchardgrass (Potomac) 50% + turf type grass (tall fescue, Millennium 20% + Kentucky bluegrass, Midnight 10% + perennial ryegrass, Palmer III 10%) + white clover(Regal) 10%}. The average DM yield for 2 years of red clover+mixture(11,656kg/ha) was higher than those of the other mixtures(p<0.05). The content of crude protein and dry manu digestibility were higher in red clover+mixture than in other mixtures(p<0.05). but, the content of fibrous compounds like as NDF, ADF, cellulose and lignin were lower in red clover+mixture than in other mixtures(p<0.05). The crude protein dry matter(CPDM) yield was higher in red clover + mixture(2,832kg/ha) than in conventional mixture(2,372kg/ha) and turf type + mixture(2,266kg/ha)(p<0.05). The digestible dry matter (DDM) yield was higher in red clover + mixture(8,881 kg/ha) than in conventional mixture(8,255kg/ha) and turf type + mixture(7,314kg/ha)(p<0.05). In botanical composition at last cutting time in 2005, conventional mixture were maintained orchardgrass 45%, tall fescue 22%, Kentucky bluegrass 5% and white clover 24%. Red clover + mixture were maintained orchardgrass 40%, tall fescue 22%, Kentucky bluegrass 4% and red clover 31%. turf type + mixture were orchardgrass 37%, tall fescue 23%, Kentucky bluegrass 6%, perennial ryegrass 8% and white clover 24%, respectively. As summary, DM yields and quality of mixture species and seeding rates were observed significant difference. The results of this experiment indicated that red clover + mixture was more effective in enhancing the DM yield and forage quality in Daejon area.

본 연구는 초종과 파종비율을 달리한 혼파초지를 비교 검토하여 건물수량과 품질을 높일 수 있는 혼파방법을 찾고자 관행 혼파초지{conventional mixtures(CM), orchardgrass (Potomad) 50% + tall fescue (Fawn)20% + Kentucky bluegrass(Kenblue) 20% + white clover(Regal) 10%}, 레드 클로버 + 혼파초지{Red clover mixtures(RM), orchardgrass (Potomac) 40 + tall fescue 20%(Fawn) + Kentucky bluegrass (Kenblue) 10% + red clover(Kenland) 30%} 및 잔디형 초종 + 혼파초지{Turf type grass mixtures(TM), orchardgrass Potomac) 50% + turf type grass(tall fescue, Millenium 20% + Kentucky bluegrass, Midnight 10% + perennial ryegrass, Palmer III 10%) + white clover, Regal 10%)의 3처리를 두어 시험하였다. 시험은 난괴법 4반복으로 충남대학교 농과대학 초지시험포장에서 2003년 9월부터 2005년 12월까지 수행하였으며, 시험결과는 다음과 같다. 2년 평균 건물수량은 레드 클로버 + 혼파초지가 11,656kg/ha으로 관행 혼파초지(11,245kg/ha)나 잔디형 초종 + 혼파초지(9,897kg/ha)에 비하여 높은 결과를 가져왔다(p<0.05). CP 함량은 연도와 혼파초지의 유형에 관계없이 레드 클로버 + 혼파 초지가 관행 혼파초지나 잔디형 초종 + 혼파초지에 비하여 높은 결과를 보였다(p<0.05). NDF, ADF, cellulose 및 lignin과 같은 섬유소물질의 함량은 조사연도와 혼파초지의 유형에 따라 대체적으로 레드 클로버 + 혼파초지에 비하여 낮은 결과를 보였다(p<0.05). 2년 평균 CPDM 수량은 레드 클로버 + 혼파초지가 2,832kg으로 관행 혼파초지(2,372kg)나 잔디형 초종 + 혼파초지(2,266kg)에 비하여 높은 결과를 나타내었다(p<0.05). 2년 평균 DDM 수량은 레드 클로버 + 혼파초지가 8,881kg으로 관행 혼파초지(8,255kg)나 잔디형 초종 + 혼파초지(7,314kg)에 비하여 높은 결과를 얻었다(p<0.05). 2005년 5회 예취시의 식생비율은 관행 혼파초지는 orchardgrass는 45%, tall fescue 22%, Kentucky bluegrass 5% 및 white clover 24%이었으며, 레드 클로버 + 혼파초지는 orchardgrass 40%, tall fescue 22%, Kentucky bluegrass 4% 및 red clover 31%이었고, 잔디형 초종 + 혼파 초지는 orchardgrass 37%, 잔디형 초종 37%(tall fescue 23%, Kentucky bluegrass 6%, perennial ryegrass 8%) 및 white clover 23%를 유지하였다. 이상의 결과를 종합할 때, 초종과 파종비율에 따른 혼파초지의 건물수량과 사료가치의 차이를 확인할 수 있었으며, 레드 클로버 + 혼파 초지가 건물수량과 사료가치를 높이는데 효과적이었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김내수, 김정우, 박홍양, 상병찬, 여정수, 전광주, 최광수, 홍기창. 1995. 응용통계학. 유한문화사. 서울
  2. 김동암. 1983. 산지초지개발의 기술적 과제. 한국농촌경제연구원. 서울. 140-196
  3. 김충수, 이인덕, 박종수, 임동찬. 1989. 초지유형별 목초의 생산성 및 이용성분석에 관한 연구. 한축지. 31(11):730-750
  4. 이인덕, 이형석. 1993. 혼파유형이 목초의 수량과 품질에 미치는 영향. 한초지. 13(1):38-42
  5. 이인덕, 이형석. 2003. 상번초 및 상.하번초형 혼파초지의 건물수량 및 사료가치 비교연구. 한초지. 23(2):121-128
  6. 이인덕, 이형석. 2005. 혼파초지의 두과초종의 차이가 건물수량 및 품질에 미치는 영향. 동물자원지. 47(6):1075-1080 https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2005.47.6.1075
  7. 이중해, 이인덕, 이형석. 2004. 하번초형 혼파조합간의 건물수량, 사료가치 및 식생비율 비교연구. 동물자원지. 46(3):443-450
  8. 이형석, 이인덕. 2006. 상번초 및 잔디형 혼파초지의 건물수량 및 사료가치 비교연구. 한초지. 26(4):221-226 https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2006.26.4.221
  9. AOAC. 1990. Official methods of analysis(15th ed.) Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington, DC
  10. Cordova, F.L. and Wallace, J.D. 1975. Nutritive value of some browse and forb species. In: Factors affecting forage intake by range ruminants. J. Range Managt. 38(4):305-312
  11. Crampton, F.W. and L.A. Maynard. 1938. The relation of cellulose and lignin content to the nutritive value of animal feeds. J. Nut. 15:383-395 https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/15.4.383
  12. Frame, J. and R.D. Harkess. 1987. The productivity of farm forage legumes sown alone and with each of five companion grasses. Grass and Forage Sci. 42:213-223 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1987.tb02109.x
  13. Goring, H.K. and P.J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage fiber analysis. Agr. Handbook. No. 379. ARS. USDA. Washington, D.C
  14. Handricksen, R.E., D.P. Poppi and D.J. Minson, 1981. The voluntary intake, digestibility and retention time by cattle and sheep of stem and leaf fraction of a tropical legume. Aust. J. Agr. Res. 32:389-398 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9810389
  15. Kothmann, M.M. 1966. Nutrient content of forage ingested in the morning compared to evening. J. Range Managt. 19:95-96 https://doi.org/10.2307/3895700
  16. Minson, D.J., C.E. Harries, W.F. Raymond and Milford, R. 1954. The digestibiliy and voluntary intake of S-22 and H. I. ryegrass, S-170 tall fescue, S-48 timothy, S-215 meadow fescue and germinal cocksfoot. J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 19:298-305 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1964.tb01177.x
  17. Peel, S. and J.O. Green. 1984. Sward composition and output on grassland farms. Grass and Forage Sci. 39:107-110 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1984.tb01671.x
  18. Tilley, J.A.M. and R.A. Terry. 1963. A two stage technique for in vitro digestibility of forage crops. J. Brit. Grassl. Sci. 18:104-111 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1963.tb00335.x
  19. Ulyatt, M.J. 1981. The feeding value of temperate pasture factors affecting forage intake by range ruminants. J. Range Managt. 38:305-312
  20. Van Dyne, G.H. and H.F. Heady, 1965. Dietary chemical composition of cattle and sheep grazing in common on a dry annual range. J. Range Managt. 18:78-85 https://doi.org/10.2307/3895472

Cited by

  1. Changes of Nutritive Value and Productivity According to Stockpiled Period in Mixed Orchardgrass-Tall Fescue Pasture of Jeju Region vol.35, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2015.35.2.93
  2. Effect of Mixed Pasture Using Domestic Varieties Orchardgrass ‘Kodione’ and Tall fescue ‘Purumi’ on Forage Yields and Botanical Composition in Middle Region of Korea vol.36, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2016.36.2.89