DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Improving the Quality of Filtered Lidar Data by Local Operations

  • Seo, Su-Young (GeoResources Institute, Mississippi State University)
  • Published : 2007.06.30

Abstract

Introduction of lidar technology have contributed to a wide range of applications in generating quality surface models. Accordingly, because of the importance of terrain surface models in mapping applications, rigorous studies have been performed to extract ground points from a lidar data point cloud. Although most filters have been shown abilities to extract ground points with their parameters tuned, however, most experiments revealed that there are certain limitations in optimizing filter parameters and the correction of remaining misclassified points is not straightforward. In this study, therefore, a method to improve the quality of filtered lidar data is proposed, which exploits neighboring surface properties arising between immediate neighbors. The method comprises a sequence of procedures which can reduce commission and omission errors. Commission errors occurring in low-rise objects are reduced by utilizing morphological operations. On the other hand, omission errors are reduced by adding missing ground points around step edges. Experimental results show that the qualities of filtered data can be improved considerably by the proposed method.

Keywords

References

  1. Axelsson, P., 2000. DEM generation from laser scanner data using adaptive TIN models, International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 33 (part A4): 110-117
  2. Briese, C. and N. Pfeifer, 2001. Airborne laser scanning and derivation of digital terrain models, Proceedings of the 5th conference on optical 3D measurement techniques, Vienna, Austria: 80-87
  3. Brovelli, M. A., M. Cannata, and U. M. Longoni, 2002. Managing and processing LIDAR data within GRASS, Proceedings of the GRASS Users Conference 2002, Trento, Italy, 29 p
  4. Elmqvist, M., 2002. Ground surface estimation from airborne laser scanner data using active shape models, International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 34 (part 3A): 114-118
  5. Haralick, R. M., L. T. Watson, and T. J. Laffey, 1983. The topographic primal sketch, International Journal of Robotics Research, 2(1): 50-72 https://doi.org/10.1177/027836498300200105
  6. Jacobsen, K. and P. Lohmann, 2003. Segmented filtering of laser scanner DSMs, International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 34(3/W13), Dresden, Germany
  7. Kilian, J., N. Haala, and M. Englich, 1996. Capture and evaluation of airborne laser data, International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 31 (part B3): 383-388
  8. Kraus, K. and Pfeifer, 1998. Determination of terrain models in wooded areas with airborne laser scanner data, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, 53: 193-203 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2716(98)00009-4
  9. Seo, S., 2003. Model-Based Automatic Building Extraction from LIDAR and Aerial Imagery, Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Geodetic Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
  10. Sithole, G., 2001. Filtering of laser altimetry data using a slope adaptive filter, International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 34 (part 3/W4): 203-210
  11. Sithole, G. and G. Vosselman, 2004. Experimental comparison of filter algorithms for bare-Earth extraction from airborne laser scanning point clouds, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, 59: 85-101 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2004.05.004
  12. Sohn, G. and I. Dowman, 2002. Terrain surface reconstruction by the use of tetrahedron model with the MDL Criterion, International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 34 (part 3A): 336-344
  13. Vosselman, G., 2000. Slope based filtering of laser altimetry data, International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 33 (part B3/2):935-942
  14. Wack, R. and A. Wimmer, 2002. Digital terrain models from airborne laserscanner data - a grid based approach, International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 34 (part 3B): 293-296
  15. Zhang, K. and D. Whitman, 2005. Comparison of three algorithms for filtering airborne lidar data, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 71(3): 313-324 https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.71.3.313
  16. Zhang, K., S.-C. Chen, D. Whitman, M.-L. Shyu, J. Yan, and C. Zhang, 2003. A Progressive morphological filter for removing nonground measurements from airborne LIDAR data, IEEE Trans. on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41(4):872-882 https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2003.810682