References
- Hayakawa T, Kiba H, Yasuda S, Yamamoto H, Nemoto K. A histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of two type of retrieved human titanium implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002;22:164-71
- Lazzara RJ, Testori T, Trisi P, Porter SS, Weinstein RL. A human histologic analysis of Osseotite and machined surfaces using implants with 2 opposing surfaces. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1999;19:117-29
- London R, Roberts F, Baker D, Rohrer M, O'Neal R. Histologic comparison of a thermal dual-etched implant surface to machined, TPS, and HA surfaces: bone contact in vivo in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:369-76
- Jo IH, Kim JY, Park SS, Park JS, Lim HS. The study of implant surround tissue response of mouse with ossteoporosis to induct ovary ressection. J Korean Acad Prothodont 1998;36:183-98
- Chehrouri B, McDonnell D, Brunette D. The effects of micromachined surfaces on formation of bone-like tissue on subcutaneous implants as accessed by radiography and computer image processing. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;37;139-51
- Kang BS, Cho IH. The histomorphologic analysis and stabilization of two implant to differ surface roughness. J korean academy of oral & maxillofacial implantology 2001;1:42-69
- Jang KS, Kim DS. Avana The analysis of surface treatment in Avana implant. J korean dentist association 2000;38:956-60
- Jo DH, Lim JH. The study of surface roughness and early stabilization of several implant. J korean acad of stomatog funcocc 2000;3:197-210
- Buser B, Schenk RK, Steinmann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants: a histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Master Res 1991;25:889-902 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820250708
- Carsson L, Rostlund T, Albreksson B, Albrektsson T. Removal torque for polished and rough titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:21-4
- Degidi M, Petrone G, Iezzi G, Piattelli A. Bone contact around acid-etched implants: A histological and histomorphometrical evaluation of two human-retrieved implants. J Oral Implantol 2003;29:13-8 https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2003)029<0013:BCAAIA>2.3.CO;2
- Wennerberg A, Ektessabi A, Albrektsson T, Johansson C, Andersson B. A 1-year follow-up of implants of differing surface roughness placed in rabbit bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:486-94
- Wennerberg A, Hallgren C, Johansson C, Danelli S. A histomorphometric evaluation of screw-shaped implants each prepared with two surface roughness. Clin Oral Implant Res 1998;9:11-9 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090102.x
- Marinho V, Celletti R, Bracchetti G, Petrone G, Minkin C, Piattelli A. Sandblasted and acid etched dental implants: A histologic study in rats. Int J Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:75-81
- Mueller WD, Gross U, Fritz T. Evaluation of the interface between bone and titanium surface being blasted by aluminium oxide or bioceramic particles. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14;349-56 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00791.x
- Abrahamsson I, Zitzmann N, Berglundh T, Wennerberg A, Lindhe J. Bone and soft tissue integration to titanium implants with different surface topography: An experimental study in the dog. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:323-32
- Kim YH, Koak JY, Chang IT, Wennerberg A, Heo SJ. A histomorphometric analysis of the effects of various surface treatment methods on osseointegration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:349-56
- Oh TJ, Yoon J, Meraw SJ, Giannobile WV, Wang HL. Healing and osseointegration of submerged microtextured oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:643-50 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00887.x
- Bowers K, Keller J, Randolph B, Wick D, Michaels C. Optimization of surface micromorphology for enhanced osteoblast response in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7;302-10
- Martin J, Schwartz Z, Hummert T. Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation, and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:389-401 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820290314
- Novaes AB, Souza S, Oliveira PT. Histomorphometric analysis of the boneimplant contact obtained with 4 different implant surface treatments placed side by side in the dog mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:377-83
- Vernino A, Kohles S, Holt R Jr, Lee HM, Caudill R, Kenealy J. Dual-etched implants loaded after 1- and 2-month healing periods: A histologic comparison in baboons. Int J Perio Rest Dent 2002;22(4):399-407
- Larsson C, Thomsen P, Lausmaa J, Rodahl M, Kasemo B, Eriksson L. Bone response to surface-modified titanium implants: Studies on electropolished implants with different oxide thickness and morphology. Biomaterials 1994;15:1062- 74 https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(94)90092-2
- Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B. Bone tissue response to commercially pure titanium implants blasted with fine and coarse particles of aluminum oxide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:38-45
- Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Johansson C, Andersson B. Experimental study of turned and grit-blasted screw-shaped implants with special emphasis on effects of blasting material and surface topography. Biomaterials 1996;17:15-22 https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(96)80750-2
- Bjursten L, Emanuelsson L, Ericson L, Thomsen P, Lausmaa J, Mattson L, et al. A new method for ultrastuctural studies of the intact tissue-metal interface. Biomaterials 1990;11:596-601 https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(90)90085-5
- Hansson H, Albrektsson T, Branemark P. Structural aspects of the interface between tissue and titanium implants. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:108-14 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(83)90175-0
- Rocci A, Martignoni M, Burgos PM, Gottlow J, Sennerby L. Histology of retrieved immediately and early loaded oxidized implants: Light microscopic observations after 5 to 9 months of loading in the posterior mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5:88-98 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00020.x