AN EVALUATION OF ANGLES BETWEEN THE ALVEOLAR CREST BONE AND THE IMPLANT EFFECT ON THE IMPLANT CRESTAL AREA INDUCED STRESSES USING A FINITE ELEMENT METHOD

임플랜트와 경부골이 이루는 각도가 치경부 응력 발생에 미치는 영향

  • Cho, Sung-Bum (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Kyu-Bok (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Jo, Kwang-Hun (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
  • 조성범 (경북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 이규복 (경북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 조광헌 (경북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Published : 2007.04.30

Abstract

Statement of problem: Main consideration was given to the stresses at the site of implant entry into the cortical bone at the alveolar crest. As a suspectible factor affecting the occurrence of stress concentrations, the contact angle between the implant and the alveolar crest bone was addressed. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate angles between the alveolar crest bone and the implant effect on the implant crestal area induced stresses using a finite element method. Material and methods: Cylindrically shaped, standard size ITI implants entering into alveolar crest with four different contact angles of 0, 15, 30, and 45 deg. with the long axis of the implant were axisymmetrically modelled. Alterations of stresses around the implants were computed and compared at the cervical cortical bone. Results and conclusion: The results demonstrated that regardless of the difference of the implant/alveolar crest bone contact angles, stress concentration occurred at the cervical bone and the angle differences led to insignificant variations in stress level.

Keywords

References

  1. Chang JM. Finite Element Approach to Investigate the Influence of the Jaw Bone Dimension on the Stresses Around the Root Analogue Dental Implant. MD thesis Department of Dentistry, Kyungpook Nat Univ 2004
  2. Park DY, Lee CH, Jo KH. Three dimensional Stress Analysis Around Osseointegrated Branemark Implant System Using An Axisymmetric Modelling Approach. J Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion 2002;18:21-30
  3. Lee JW, Lee CH, Jo KH. Finite element analysis of the stress distribution with load transfer characteristic of the implant/bone interface. J Korean Academy Implant Dentistry 2003;22:48-56
  4. Lee SH, Jo KH. Stress analysis with nonlinear modelling of the load transfer characteristic across the osseointegration interfaces of dental implant. J Korean Academy Prosthet 2004;42:267-79
  5. Kum YJ. Finite Element Analysis of the Influences of the Implant Diameter on the Cortical Bone Stresses. J Korean Academy Oral Maxillofac Implantology 2005;9:42-63
  6. Lee JH, Kim CW, Kim YS. A comparison of load transfer in screw-and cementretained implant fixed partial denture design. J Korean Academy Prosthet 2001; 39:125-45
  7. Asaoka K, Kuwayama N, Okuno O, Miura I. Mechanical properties and biomechanical compatibility of porous titanium for dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1985 Jul-Aug;19(6):699-713 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820190609
  8. Nicolella DP, Lankford J, Jepsen K, Davy DT. Correlation of physical damage development with microstructure and strain localization in bone. In Chandran KB, Vendervy R Jr, Hefzy MS (edi) : 1997 Bioengineering Conference, New York : ASME, 1997;37:311-2
  9. Papavasiliou G, Kamposiora P, Bayne SC. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress-distribution around single tooth implants as a function of bony support, prosthesis type, and loading during function. J Prosthet Dent 1996;67(6): 633-40
  10. Lennart Mollerstern, Paul Lockowandt and Lars-Ake Linden. Comparison of strength and failure mode of seven implant systems: An in vitro rest. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78(6):582-91 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70009-X
  11. Rieger MR, Mayberry M, Brose MO. Finite element analysis of six endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63(6):671- 6 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90325-7
  12. Richter EJ. In vivo vertical forces on implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995 Jan-Feb;10(1):99-108
  13. Anderson DJ. Measurement of stress in mastication. I. J Dent Res 1956;35:664- 70 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.05.002
  14. Anderson DJ. Measurement of stress in mastication. II. J Dent Res 1956;35:671- 3 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345560350050301
  15. Amtmann E. The distribution of the breaking strength in the femur. J Biomech 1968;1:271-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(68)90022-5
  16. Kinni ME, Hokama SN, Capto AA. Force transfer by osseointegration implant device. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987; 2(1):11-4
  17. Hassler CR, Rybicki EF, Cummings KD, Clark LC. Quantification of bone stresses during remodelling. J Biomech 1980;13: 185-90 https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(80)90192-X
  18. Cook SD, Weinstein AM, Klawitter JJ. A three dimensional finite element analysis of a porous rooted Co-Cr-Mo alloy dental implant. J Dent Res 1982;61:25-9 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345820610010501
  19. Han Chonghun, Chun HungJae, Jung Sinyoung, Hei Seongjoo, Choi Yongchang, Chun Chongpyung, Ku Young, Rue Inchul, Kim Myungho. Studies of osseointegrated implant-models on stress distribution. J Korean Academy Prosthet 2000;38(4):526- 42
  20. Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient seletion and preparation. In Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T (eds) : Tissue-integrated prosthses: Osseointegration in clinical dentistry, Chicago. Quintessence 1985;199- 209
  21. NISA II / DISPLAY III User's Manuel, Engineering Mechanics Research Corporation (EMRC)