References
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 'Traffic safety facts 1998', Washington, D.C, U.S. Department of Transportation, NHTSA, 1999
- Ktdb.go.kr, 국가교통데이타베이스
- 건설교통부, '교통안전연차보고서 2005', 건설교통부, 2005
- 이안재, 'Driver''s characteristics in car following', Ph.D. thesis, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 2001
- 건설교통부, '교통안전 5차기본계획(2002-2006)', 건설교통부, 2004
- Kirwan, B., 'A guide to practical human reliability assessment' Taylor & Francis, 1994
- O' Hara J.M., Higgins J.C., Persensky J.J., Lewis P.M., Bongarra J.P., 'Human Factors Engineering Program Review Model, NUREG-0711, Rev. 2' Brookhaven National Laboratory, Energy Sciences and Technology Department, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2004
- Rail Safety & Standards Board, 'Rail-specific HRA tool for Driving tasks (T270) Final report' Rail Safety & Standards Board Research report, November 2004
- Salvatore Massaiu, Kjell Haugset, Thorbjorn J. Bjorlo, 'Human Reliability Issues in Traffic Control Centres' Institutt for energitecknikk, Halden, Norway, 2003
- Heiner Bubb, 'Reliability of the Driver a Method of Driver Modeling for Prevention of Driver Failure' The ICTCT-workshop, Salzburg, 1993
- Budescu, D. V., Wallsten, T. S., Dyadic decisions with numerical and verbal probabilities, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46, 240-263, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(90)90031-4
- Budescu, D. V. and Wallsten, T. S., Subjective estimation of precise and vague uncertainties, Judgmental Forecasting, 63-81, 1987
- Hamm, R. M., Selection of verbal probabilities: a solution for some problems of verbal probability expression, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 48, 193-223, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90012-I
- Brun, W., Teigen, K. H., Verbal probabilities: ambiguous, context-dependent, of both?, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 390-404, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(88)90036-2
- Erev, I. and Cohen, B. L., Verbal versus numerical probabilities: efficiency, biases, and the preference paradox, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 45, 1-18, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(90)90002-Q
- Wallsten, T. S., Budescu, D. V. and Zwick, R., Comparing the calibration and coherence of numerical and verbal probability judgment, Management Science, 39, 176-190, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.39.2.176
- Tavana, M., Kennedy, D. T. and Mohebbi, B., An Applied study using the analytic hierarchy process to translate common verbal phrases to numerical probabilities, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 10, 133-150, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199706)10:2<133::AID-BDM255>3.0.CO;2-5
- Chezy Ofir, Srinivas K. Reddy, Measurement Errors in Probability Judgments, Management Science, 42(9), 1308-1325, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.42.9.1308
- Ramsey, J.O., The effects of number of categories in rating scales on the precision of the estimation of scale values, Psychometrika, 38, 513-532, 1973 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291492
- Reason, J., Antony Manstead, Stephen Stradling, James Baxter, Karen Campbell, Errors and violations on the roads: a real distinction?, Ergonomics, 33(10/11), 1315-1332, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139008925335
- Parker, D., Reason, J. T., Manstead, A. S. R and Standing, S. G., Driving errors, driving violations and accident involvement, Ergonomics, 38, 1036- 1048, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139508925170
- Blokey, P. N. and Hartley, L. R., Aberrant driving behaviour: errors and violations, Ergonomics, Vol. 38, No. 9, 1759-1771, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139508925225
- Reason J., 'Human Error' Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990