DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic Performance Evaluation of a RC Special Moment Frame Building

철근 콘크리트 특수 모멘트 골조 건물의 내진 성능 평가

  • 김태완 (성균관대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 김진구 (성균관대학교 건축공학과)
  • Published : 2007.04.30

Abstract

In this study the probability and the reliability-based seismic performance evaluation procedure proposed in the FEMA-355F was applied to a reinforced concrete moment frame building. For the FEMA procedure, which was originally developed for steel moment frame structures, to be applied to other structural systems, the capacity should be re-defined and the factors reflecting the uncertainties related to capacity and demand need to be determined. To perform the evaluation procedure a prototype building was designed per IBC 2003, and inelastic dynamic analyses were conducted applying site-specific ground motions to determine the parameters for performance evaluation. According to the analysis results, distribution of the determined capacities turned out to be relative]y smaller than that of the demands, which showed that the defined capacity was reasonable. It was also shown that the prototype building satisfied the target performance since the determined confidence levels exceeded the otjectives for both local and global collapses.

본 연구에서는 확률과 신뢰성을 바탕으로 개발된 FEMA-355F의 내진성능 평가기법을 적용하여 철근 콘크리트 모멘트골조 건물의 내진성능을 평가하였다. 철골 구조물을 대상으로 개발된 FEMA의 성능평가 방식을 다른 구조 시스템에 적용할 때 각 시스템에 적합한 성능값을 결정해야하며, 요구값과 성능값 계산 시 수반되는 불확실성을 반영하는 계수들을 새로이 구해야 한다. 이를 수행하기 위해 예제 건물을 IBC 2003에 따라 설계한 후, 성능평가에 필요한 변수들을 결정하기 위해 건물의 위치에 적합한 지반운동을 이용하여 비탄성 동적 해석을 수행하였다. 해석결과에 따르면 계산된 성능값의 분포는 요구값에 비해 상대적으로 작았으며, 이 결과는 본 연구에서 결정된 성능값이 합리적임을 나타낸다. 구해진 신뢰도는 부분 및 전체 붕괴 모두에 대해 목표치를 초과하였으므로 예제 건물은 목표 성능을 만족하는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. FEMA 355F, State of the Art Report on Performance Prediction and Evaluation of Steel Moment-Frame Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., 2000
  2. Yun, S.-Y., Hamburger, R.O., Cornell, C.A. and Foutch, D.A., 'Seismic performance evaluation for steel moment frames,' Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 128, No. 4, 2002, pp. 534-545 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(534)
  3. Lee, K. and Foutch, D.A., 'Seismic performance evaluation of pre-Northridge steel frame buildings with brittle counections,' Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 128, No.4, 2002, pp. 546-555 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(546)
  4. Lee, K. and Foutch, D.A., 'Performance evaluation of new steel frame buildings for seismic loads,' Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 31, No.3, 2002, pp. 653-670 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.147
  5. IBC, International Building Code, International Code Council, Inc., Falls Church, Virginia, 2003, pp. 756
  6. ACI 318 Committee, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-02) and Commentary (ACI 318R-02), American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan, 2002, pp. 443
  7. 김태완, '철근 콘크리트 특수 모멘트 골조 건물의 비탄성 동적 요구값', 한국지진공학회 논문집, 제9권, 제5호, 2005, pp. 11-19 https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2005.9.5.011
  8. Prakash, V., Powell, G. and Campbell, S., 'DRAIN-2DX base program description and user guide - version 1.10,' Report no. UCB/SEMM-93/17 and 93/18, Structural Eng. Mechanics and Materials, Dept. of Civil Eng., Univ. of California, Berkeley, California, 1993, pp. 90
  9. Foutch, D.A., Shi, S. and Yun, S-Y., 'Element 10: A stiffness and strength degrading element developed for the SAC steel program,' distributed with DRAIN-2DX by the National Information Service for Earthquake Engineering, available from http://nisee.berkeley.edu/software/drain2dx/, 2003
  10. Somerville, P., N. Smith, S. Puntamurthula, and J. Sun, 'Development of Ground Motion Time Histories for Phase 2 of the FEMAISAC Steel Project,' Background Document, Report No. SAC/BD-97/04, 1997
  11. Jalayer, F., Cornell, C.A., 'A Technical framework for probability-based demand and capacity factor design (DCFD) seismic formats,' PEER Report 2003/8, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Center, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 2003
  12. Cornell, C.A., Jalayer, F., Hamburger, R.O. and Foutch, D.A., 'Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency steel moment frame guidelines,' Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 128, No.4, 2002, pp. 526-533 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526)
  13. Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C.A., 'Incremental Dynamic Analysis,' Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 31, 2001, pp. 491-514 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141
  14. Kim, T.-W., Foutch, D.A., LaFave, J.M. and Wilcoski, J., 'Performance Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Structural Walls for Seismic Loads,' Structural Research Series - No. 634, Dept. of Civil and Enviroumental Eng., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL., 2004
  15. Ghobarah, A., Abou-Elfath, H. and Biddah, A., 'Response-Based Damage Assessment of Structures,' Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 28, 1999, pp. 79-104 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199901)28:1<79::AID-EQE805>3.0.CO;2-J
  16. Park, Y.J. and Ang, Alfred H.S., 'Mechanistic Seismic Damage Model for Reinforced Concrete,' Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 111, No.4, 1985, pp. 722-739 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:4(722)
  17. Izuno, K., Iemura, H., Yamada, Y. and Fujisawa, S., 'Seismic Damage Assessment of RC Structures using Different Hysteretic Models,' Memoirs of the Faculty of Engineering, Vol. 55, No.1, 1993, pp. 1-19
  18. Elenas, A. and Meskouris, K., 'Correlation Study between Seismic Acceleration Parameters and Damage Indices of Structures,' Engineering Structures, Vol. 23, 2001, pp. 698-704 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(00)00074-2
  19. Goel, R.K. and Chopra, A.K., 'Vibration properties of buildings determined from recorded earthquake motions,' Report No. UCB/EERC-97/14, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 1997
  20. Nowak, A.S. and Szerszen, M.M., 'Reliablility-based calibration for structural concrete, phase 1 ,' Research Report UMCEE 01-04, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 2001