An Analysis of the Visual Preference on Parallax Space by Blockage Pattern and Ratio

차폐유형과 차폐도를 달리한 패럴랙스(Parallax) 공간의 시각 선호도

  • Rho, Jae-Hyun (Dept. of Landscape Architecture and Urban Design, Woosuk University)
  • 노재현 (우석대학교 조경도시디자인학과)
  • Published : 2007.06.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to create a planting design for progressive realization. For this, visual preferences as measured via questionnaire were evaluated by the Scenic Beauty Estimation(SBE) and paired comparison methods. The results can be summarized as follows. Through photo observation, the average visual blockage ratio was 38% and the range of degree of the visual blockage ratio was $30{\sim}50%$. The sketch simulation and filtered pattern received the highest preference score and fumed out to be the most practical pattern out of all the patterns evaluated. Also, in the sketch simulation, the high preference values were observed for a distance of 9 to 12m from the view point to the blockage tree with a D/H ratio of 2. The preference score significantly decreased with the increase of the visual blockage ratio having a turning point at $30{\sim}35%$ of the visual blockage ratio, even though the distance parameters were more important than the visual blockage ratio in the scores. An outstanding view must be handled properly to be preserved or accentuated. Framed, open, enclosed, screened or filtered pattern views should be completely revealed only from their best vantage point, not given away at first glimpse. It this sense, parallax spatial beauty with trees could be improved through the visual aspects of plan arrangements and seems to be an effective design technique for landscape planning and planting design.

Keywords

References

  1. 박철민, 김성훈(2004) 경관도로변 건축물의 시각척 차폐도 분석. 대학국토.도시계획학회지 39(4): 135-154
  2. 반호용(1973) 투시도에서 입체감의 재현과 시지각에 관한 연구. 대한건축학회지 15(5): 3-9
  3. 양병이(1990) 경관선호도의 인지인자에 관한 연구. 한국조경학회지 17(3): 19-20
  4. 양위주(1985) 시각적 복잡성의 장소별 적정수준에 관한 연구. 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
  5. 이태희(1984) 쌍체비교기법을 통한 중정의 시각선호에 관한 연구. 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
  6. 조대성(1983) 도시건축의 환경지각과 패럴랙스(Parallax)의 공간미에 관한 연구. 국토계획학회지 17(2): 27-39
  7. 조재우(1985) 가로에서 지각되는 시각적 복잡성의 선호에 관한 연구. 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
  8. 최영철, 홍승재, 김효선, 윤희상, 남호연, 박언곤(1989) 정자건축의 난간과 공간연출에 관한 연구. 대한건축학회논문집 9(2): 205-208
  9. 한동수(1997) 중국고건축.원립감상입문. 도서출판 세진사: 192-202
  10. 篠原修(1982) 新體系土木工學. 59 土木景觀計劃. 日本土木學會: 28-33
  11. 大山陽生 (1970) 造園美學. 造形構成, 誠新光社刊 : 64-65. 126-127
  12. Alexander, C, S. Ishikawa and M. Silverstein(1977) A pattern language. New York. Oxford Univ. Press: 1108-1111
  13. Collins, P. (1999) Changing Ideals in Modern Architecture, Montreal. McGill Queen's Univ. Press: 27-28, 292-303
  14. Cullen, G.(1964) Townscape. New York Reinhold Publishing Co: 126-132
  15. Giedion S.(1967) Space, Time and Architecture 5th. Cambridge. Harvard Univ. Press: 285-290, 436
  16. Gimblett. H. R., R. M. Kami and J. E. Fitzgibbo(1985) Mystery in an information processing model of landscape preference. Landscape Journal 4(2): 87-95 https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.4.2.87
  17. Henry, F. A. (1980). Trees in Urban Design, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co: 35-42
  18. Kaplan, S., R. Kaplan and J. S. Wendt(1973) Rated preference and complexity for natural and urban visual material. Perception and Psychophysics 12(4): 111-121
  19. Rapport, A. and R. E. Kantor(1970) Complexity and Ambiguity in Environmental Design J. of the American Institute of Planners (July): 165-207
  20. Rapport, A. (1977) Human Aspect of Urban Form Oxford. Pregamin Press: 208
  21. Robinette, G. D.(1972) Plant people and environment auality. American Society of Landscape Architects Foundation. 1: 30-35
  22. Ross. R. T.(1939) 'Comparison.' J. of Experimental Psychology. 25: 414-424 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0056645
  23. Simonds, S. J. O.(1961) Landscape Architecture. Mcgraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.: 115-123
  24. http: //www.litiholo.com/hologram_faq.htm
  25. www.scienceall.com