Root coverage with subeptithelial connective tissue grafts

상피하결합조직 이식술을 이용한 치근면 피개

  • Song, Hyun-Jong (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Jang, Hyun-Seon (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Kim, Byung-Ock (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
  • 송현종 (조선대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 장현선 (조선대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 김병옥 (조선대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실)
  • Published : 2007.09.30

Abstract

Marginal tissue recession makes problems like esthetics, root caries, hypersensitivity and plaque accumulation. Request for root coverage is higer than ever, especially esthetic problems involved. So techniques for root coverage hav been developed. There are some kinds of surgical techniques using soft tissue for root coverage. For example, free gingival graft, kinds of pedicle flap, subepithelial connective tissue graft(SCTG), and so on. Subepithelial connective tissue graft has many advantage for root coverage, that is less pain on donor site, good blood supply for graft, and more esthetic result. For this reaseon, this case report was performed to evaluate the effect of root coverage using subepithelial connective tissue graft. Three patients has Miller's class I marginal tissue recession and one patients has Miller's class III marginal tissue recession. The following period is 36.5 month on average. The results are as follows: 1. Root coverage of 100% was obtained in 5 of 6 defects, and 80% was obtained in 1 of 6 defects, The mean root coverage was 96,6% in six cases on 4 patients. 2. The mean root coverage was 3.83mm and mean recession depth decreased from 4mm to 0.16mm. 3. The mean width of clinical attached gingiva increased from 1.5mm to 4mm. The mean width of gained attached gingiva after surgery was 2.5mm. 4. The mean follow up period was 36.5 months. The longest follow up period was 50 months and the shortest follow up period was 22 months. 5. The result that obtained by surgery was stable during follow up period. Within the above results, root coverage with SCTG is an effective procedure to cover marginal tissue recession defect with long term stability.

Keywords

References

  1. Lac H, Anerud A, Boyse H, The nature history of periodontal disease in man: prevalence, severity, and extent of gingival recession, J periodontal, 1992 Jun:63(6):489-495 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1992.63.6.489
  2. Hall WB, Present status of soft tissue grafting, J Periodontal 1977;48:587-97 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1977.48.9.587
  3. Baker DL. Seymour GJ. The possible pathogenesis of gingival recession, A histological study of induced recession in the rat. J Clin Periodontal. 1976 Nov: 3(4) : 208-19 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1976.tb00040.x
  4. Khocht A Simon G, Person P, Denepitiya JL, Gingival recession in relation to history of hard toothbrush use. J Periodontal 1993:64:900-905 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1993.64.9.900
  5. Smukler H, Landberg J, The toothbrush and gingival traumatic injury, J Periodontol, 1984: 55: 713-719 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1984.55.12.713
  6. Boyd RL, mucogingival considerations and their relationship to orthodontics J Periodontol, 1978:49:67-76 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1978.49.2.67
  7. Newman MG, Takei HH, Carranza FA Carranza's clinical periodontology, 9th ed Saunders, 2002
  8. Donaldson D, Gingival recession associated with temporary crowns J Periodontol 1973:44:691-696 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1973.44.11.691
  9. Wilson RD, Marginal tissue recession in general dental practice: a preliminary study, Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 1983:3(1) :40-53
  10. Hardee PS, Mallya LR. Hutchison IL, Tongue piercing resulting in hypotensive collapse, Br, Dent, J. 2000 Jun 24; 188(12): 657-658
  11. Chambrone L, Chambrone LA. Gingival recession caused by lip piercing: case report. Dent Assist, 2004
  12. 허익. 치주치료에서 임플란트까지. 초판, 명문출판사. 2005
  13. 小野 善弘, 畠山 善行, 官本 泰和, 松井 德雄, 장세원, 최장우 역. 예지성 높은 치과치료. 초판, 한국퀸테센스출판, 2002
  14. Sullivan HC, Atkin JC, Free autogenous gingival grafts, III. Utilization of grafts in the treatment of gingival recession, Periodontics 1968;6:152
  15. Miller PD. A classification of marginal tissue recession. Int. J. Periodont Res Dent 1985:5:8-13
  16. Jan Lindhe, Thorkild Karring, Niklaus P, Lang, Clinical periodontology and implant dentistry. 4th ed. Blackwell Munksraard, a Blackwell Publishing company, 2003
  17. Langer B, Langer L. Subepi thelial connective tissue graft technique for root coverage. J Periodontal. 1985:56:715-720 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1985.56.12.715
  18. Nelson SW. The subepithelial connective tissue graft - A bilaminar reconstructive procedure for the coverage of denuded root surface. J Periodontal. 1987:58:95-102 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1987.58.2.95
  19. Harris RJ. The Connective tissue and partial-thickness double pedicle graft: a predictable method of obtaining root coverage. J Periodontal. 1992:63:477-486 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1992.63.5.477
  20. Bruno JF. Connective tissue technique assuring wide root coverage. Int J, Periodontal Rest Dent. 1994;14:127-137
  21. Naoshi Sato, 김종관 역. 치주수술의 임상과 테크닉. 3판 신흥인터네셔날. 2003
  22. Wolf HF. Rateitschak EM & KH, Hassell TM. 김병옥. 김성조 김영준 외 역. Color Atlas 치주과학 초판, 지성출판사. 2006
  23. Roccuzzo M, Bunino M. Needleman I, Sanz M. Periodontal plastic surgery for treatment of localized gingival recessions: a systemic review. J Clin, Periondontol 2002:29 suppl 3:178-196 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.29.s3.11.x
  24. Ricci G, Silverstri M, Rasperini G, Cattaneo V. Root coverage.a clinical/statistical comparison between subpedicle connective tissue graft and laterally positioned full thickness flap. Journal of Esthetic Dentistry. 1996:8:66-73 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1996.tb00887.x
  25. Zucchelli G, Clauser C. De Sanctis M. Calandriello M. Mucogingival versus guided tissue regeneration procedures in the treatment of deep recession type defects. J. Periodontol 1998; 69: 138-145 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1998.69.2.138
  26. Paolantonio M, Di Murro C, Cattabriga A, Cattabriga M. Subpedicle connective tissue gran versus free gingival graft in the coverage of exposed root surfaces. A 5-year clinical study. J Clin Periodontol 1997: 24:51-56 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1997.tb01184.x
  27. Trombelli L, Scabbia A, Tatakis DN. Checchi L, Calura G. Subpedicle connective tissue graft versus guided tissue regeneration with bioabsorbable membrane in the treatment of human gingival recession defects. J. Periodontal. 1998:69: 1271-1277 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1998.69.11.1271
  28. Jepsen K. Heinz B. Halben JH, Jepsen S. Treatment of gingival recession with titanium reinforced barrier membranes versus connective tissue grafts. J Periodontal 1998:69:383-391 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1998.69.3.383
  29. Harris RJ. The connective tissue and partial thickness double pedicle graft: A predictable method of obtaining root coverage. J Periodontal. 1992;63:477-486 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1992.63.5.477
  30. Moses O, Artzi Z, Sculean A et al. Comparative study of two coverage procedures: a 24-month follow-up multicenter study. J Periondontol, 2006:77: 195-202 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.050008
  31. Miller PD. Periodontal plastic surgical technique for regeneration. In: Periodontal regeneration Current statue and directions. edited by Polson AM. Quintessence, 1994
  32. Harris RJ, Miller R, Miller LH, Harris C. Complications with surgical procedures utilizing connective tissue grafts: a follow-up of 500 consecutively treated cases, Int. J. Periodontol Rest Dent, 2005;25:449-459
  33. Carnio J, Camargo PM, Kenney EB. Root resorption associated with a subepithelial connective tissue graft for root coverage: clinical and histologic report of a case. Int. J, Periodontal Rest Dent. 2003;23:391-398
  34. Wennstrom JL, Lindhe J, SinclEur F, Thilander B. Some periodontal tissue reactions to orthodontic tooth movement in monkeys. J Clin Periodontol 1987;14:121-9 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1987.tb00954.x
  35. Maynard JG Jr, Wilson RD. Physiolosic dimensions of the periodontium significant to the restorative dentist. J Periodontol 1979: 50:170-4 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1979.50.4.170