Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지

Comparative Study Of Osseointergration On Different Immediate Implants In Extraction Sockets Of Beagle Dogs

성견에 발치 후 즉시 임플란트 식립시 RBM 처리된 임플란트의 골융합에 관한 연구

  • Sun, Ki-Jong (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Park, Jae-Young (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Jung, Eun-Gyeong (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Shin, Mee-Ran (Department of Dentistry, Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University) ;
  • Kim, Yun-Sang (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Pi, Sung-Hee (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Shin, Hyung-shik (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • You, Hyung-Keun (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
  • 선기종 (원광대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 박재영 (원광대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 정은경 (원광대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 신미란 (한림대학교 한강성심병원 치과학교실) ;
  • 김윤상 (원광대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 피성희 (원광대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 신형식 (원광대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 유형근 (원광대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실)
  • Published : 2007.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Recently, immediately after losing teeth. implant placement has been greatly attempted. Implant can help restoration of tooth functions within short time. This study was an attempt to examine the extent of osseointergation when the implants will be placed immediately after teeth extraction using domestic implant systems. Implants were inserted in beagle dogs and evaluated the clinical, radiological, histological and histomorphometric assay at 6 weeks and 12 weeks. For experimental materals, $STAGE-1^{(R)}$($4.1{\times}8mm$, Lifecore, USA), $SS-III^{(R)}$($4.0{\times}8mm$, OSSTEM, Korea) and $IFI^{(R)}$($4.0{\times}8mm$, Dio, Korea) implants treated with RBM were placed. All the placed site showed normal results without fail and inflammation clinically and radiologically. As a result of measurement by periotest, it showed $-2\;{\sim}\;-5$ and stable status comprehensively. There was no statistically significant difference among implants(p<0.05). Bone tissue adjacent to implant showed increased marrow tissue at 6 weeks. Nevertheless, osteogenic structure was not observed remarkably. In a 12 weeks opinion, bone tissue composed of osseointegration along implant interface showed significantly decreased marrow tissue containing central vessels unlike a 6 weeks opinion and matured compact bone whose osteogenic structure is well formed. BIC were 42.4%, 32.0% and 34.9%, respectively in 6 weeks and there was no statistically significant difference among group(p<0.05). In 12 weeks, BIC were 58.8%, 61.9% and 57.5%. respectively and there was no statistically significant difference among groups(p<0.05). It is considered that all 3 implant systems are suitable for immediate implant placement.

Keywords

References

  1. Barzilay L, Graser GN, Iranpour B, et al, Immediate implantation of pure itanium implant into an extraction socket : Report of a pilot procedure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:277-284
  2. Lazzara RM. Immediate implant placement into extraction site : Surgical and restorative advantages. Int J Perio Rest Dent 1989; 9: 333-343
  3. Parel SM, Triplett RG. Immediate fixture placement: A treatment planning alternative. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;54:337-345
  4. Schulte W, Heirnke G. The Tubinger immediate implant, Berlin, Quintessenz 1976;27:17-23
  5. Paolantonio M, Dolci M, Scarano A, et al., Immediate implantation in fresh extraction sockets. A controlled clinical and histological study in man. J periodontol 2001; 72: 1560-1571 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.11.1560
  6. Anneroth G, Hedstrom KG, Kjellman O, et al, Endosseous titanium implants in extraction sockets. An experimental study in monkeys. Int J Oral Surg 1985;14:50-54 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(85)80010-7
  7. Bränemark PI, Breine U. Intraosseous anchorage of dental Prosthesis. experimental studies. ScandI Plast Reconstr Surg 1969;3:81
  8. Albrektsson T. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;52:155-170 https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678108991776
  9. Deporter DA, Watson PA, Pilliar RM. A histological assessment of the initial healing response adjacent to porous - surfaced, titanium alloy dental implant system in dogs. J Dent Res 1986;65:1064-1070 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345860650080501
  10. Hobo S, Ichida E, Garcia LT. Osseointegration and Occlusal Rehabilitation. Chicago, Quintessence Publishing Co. 1989; 21-30
  11. Skalak R. Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1989;49:843-848
  12. Albrektsson T, Zarb GA, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants. A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25
  13. Buser D, Scjenk RK, Steinemann S, et al, Influence surface characreristics in bone integration titanium implants. Ahistomor-phometic study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:889-902 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820250708
  14. Block MS, Finger IM, Fontenot MG, ank Kent IN. Loaded hydroxyapatite coated and grit blasted titanium implants in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:219-225
  15. Brunski JB. Biomaterials and biomechanics in dental implant design. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:85-97
  16. Schliephake H, Reiss G, urban R, Neukam FW, and Guckel S. Metal release from titanium experimental study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8(5):502-511
  17. Sykaras N, Iacopin AM, Marker VA, Triplett RG, Wooky RD. Implant materials, designs, and surface topographies: their effect on ossointegration. A Literature Review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15(5): 675-690
  18. Oslini G, Assenza B, Scarano A, Piatelli M, Piatelli A. surface analysis of machined versus sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15(6): 779-784
  19. Smith DC. Biomaterials in dentistry. J Dent Res 1975; 54B: 145-152
  20. Bränemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 50: 399-410 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(83)80101-2
  21. Van Scotter DE, Wilson CJ. The Periotest method for determining implant success. J Oral Implantol 1991;17:410-413
  22. Van Steenberghe D, Tricio J, Naert I, Nys M. Damping characteristics of bone to implant interfaces. A clinical study with the Periotest device. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:31-39 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060104.x
  23. Albrektsson T, Sennerby L. Direct bone anchorage of oral implants. : Clinical and experimental considerations of the concept of osseointegration. Int J Prosthodont 1990; 3:30-41
  24. Buser D, Scjenk RK, Steinemann S, et al, Influence of surface characteristics in bone integration titanium implants. A stomor-phometic study in miniature pigs. J Biomed. Matsr 1991;25:889-902 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820250708
  25. Maurizio P, Antonio S, Michele P, et al, Bone response to machined and resorbable blast material titanium implants: An experimental sturdy in rabbits. oral implantol 2003;28:2-8
  26. Piattelli M, Scarno A, Paolantonio M, et al, Bone response to machined and resorbable blast material titanium implants: An experimental study in rabbits. J Oral Implantol 2002;28:2-8 https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2002)028<0002:BRTMAR>2.3.CO;2
  27. Sanz A, Oyarzun A, Farias D, Diaz I Experimental study of bone response to a new surface treatment of endosseous titanium implants. Implant Dent 2001;10:126-131 https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-200104000-00009
  28. Wennerberg A, Ektessabi A, Albrektsson T, Johansson C, Andersson B. A 1-year follow-up of implants of differing surface roughness placedin rabbit bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:486-494
  29. Novas AB Jr, Vidigal GM Jr, Novaes AB, et al, Immediate implants placed into infected sites: A histomorphometric study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac implants 1998;13:422-427
  30. Johansson, C., and Albrektsson, T. Intefration of screw implants in the rabbit : A 1 year follow-up of removal torque of titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987;2:69-75
  31. Grunder U, Gaberthuel T, Boitel N, et al Evaluating the clinical performance of the Osseotite implant: defining proshetic predictability. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1999; 20: 628-40
  32. Gelb DA, Immediate implant surgery: ten year clinical overview. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1999;20:1185-96
  33. Weiss M.B., and Rostoker W. Development of a new endosseous dental implant. Part I : Animal studies. J Prosthet Dent 1981;46: 646-651 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(81)90073-1
  34. Hodosh M., Povar M., and Shklar G. The porous vitreous carbonepoly-methacrylate replica implant. Continuing studies. J Prothet 1979;42:557-565 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(79)90254-3
  35. Todescan R., Pillar R.M., and Mechler A,H. A small animal model for investigating endosseous dental implants : Effect of graft material on healing of endosseous, porous-surfaced implants in placed in a fresh extraction socket. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987;2:217-112
  36. Dahlin C., et al Generation of new bone around titanium implants using a membrane technique: An experimantal study in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989; 10: 19-25
  37. Buser, D., Warrer, K., Karring, T., and Stich, H. Titanium implants with a true periodontal ligament : An alternative to osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:113-116