Structural Engineering and Mechanics

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Lateral force-displacement ductility relationship of non-ductile squat RC columns rehabilitated using FRP confinement

  • Galal, K. (Department of Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Concordia University)
  • Received : 2006.01.03
  • Accepted : 2006.08.09
  • Published : 2007.01.10
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Post-earthquake reconnaissance and experimental research indicate that squat reinforced concrete (RC) columns in existing buildings or bridge piers are vulnerable to non-ductile shear failure. Recently, several experimental studies were conducted to investigate upgrading the shear resistance capacity of such columns in order to modify their failure mode to ductile one. Among these upgrading methods is the use of fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP) jackets. One of the preferred analytical tools to simulate the response of frame structures to earthquake loading is the lumped plasticity macromodels due to their computational efficiency and reasonable accuracy. In these models, the columns' nonlinear response is lumped at its ends. The most important input data for such type of models is the element's lateral force-displacement backbone curve. The objective of this study is to verify an analytical method to predict the lateral force-displacement ductility relationship of axially and laterally loaded rectangular RC squat columns retrofitted with FRP composites. The predicted relationship showed good accuracy when compared with tests available in the literature.

Keywords

References

  1. ACI (1968), 'Manual of concrete practice', Part 2, Committee 318-1R-68, American Concrete Institute, Detroit
  2. ACI (2002), 'Guide for the design and construction of externally bonded FRP systems for strengthening concrete structures', Committee 440 Report 440.2R-02, American Concrete Institute, Detroit
  3. CSA (1994), 'Design of concrete structures', Standard A23.3, Canadian Standards Association, Rexdale, Ontario
  4. FEMA 273/274 (1997), 'NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation for buildings', Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington D.C
  5. FIB (2001), 'Externally bonded FRP reinforcement for RC structures', Technical Report Bulletin No. 14, Federation Internationale du Beton, France
  6. Galal, K., Arafa, A. and Ghobarah, A. (2005), 'Retrofit of RC square short columns', J. Eng. Struct., 27(5),801-813 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.01.003
  7. Galal, K. and Ghobarah, A. (2003), 'Flexural and shear hysteretic behaviour of reinforced concrete columns with variable axial load', J. Eng. Struct., 25(11), 1353-1367 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00111-1
  8. Ghobarah, A. and Galal, K. (2004), 'Seismic rehabilitation of short rectangular RC columns', J. Earthq. Eng., 8(1), 45-68 https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363246904001316
  9. Haroun, M.A., Mosallam, A.S., Feng, M.Q. and Elsanadedy, H.M. (2002), 'Composite jackets for the seismic retrofit and repair of bridge columns', 7th U.S. Nat. Conf. Earthquake Eng., Oakland, California
  10. ISIS Canada (2001), 'Strengthening reinforced concrete structures with externally-bonded fibre reinforced polymers (FRPs)', Design Manual, University of Manitoba
  11. Kowalsky, M.J., Priestley, M.J.N. and Seible, F. (1999), 'Shear and flexural behavior of lightweight concrete bridge columns in seismic regions', ACI Struct. J., 96(1), 136-148
  12. Mander J.B., Priestley, M.J.N. and Park, R. (1988), 'Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete', J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 114(8), 1804-1826 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804)
  13. NISEE (2006), http://nisee.berkeley.edu/elibrary, Images, Shear Column, Retrieved Jan. 2006
  14. Priestley, M.J.N., Verma, R. and Xiao, Y. (1994), 'Seismic shear strength of reinforced concrete columns', J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 120(8), 2310-2329 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:8(2310)
  15. Seible, F., Priestley, M.J.N., Hegemier, G.A. and Innamorato, D. (1997), 'Seismic retrofit of RC columns with continuous carbon fibre jackets', J. Compos. Constr, ASCE, 1(2), 52-62 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1997)1:2(52)
  16. Vision 2000 committee (1995), 'Performance based seismic engineering of buildings', Str. Eng. Assoc. of California (SEAOC), Sacramento, California
  17. Ye, L., Yue, Q., Zhao, S. and Li, Q. (2002), 'Shear strength of reinforced concrete columns strengthened with carbon-fiber-reinforced plastic sheet', J. Struct. Eng., 128(12), 1527-1534 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:12(1527)
  18. Yoshimura, K., Kikuchi, K., Kuroki, M., Ozawa, K. and Masuda, Y. (2000), 'Experimental study on seismic behavior of R/C short columns strengthened by carbon fiber sheets', Composite and Hybrid Structures: Proc. of the 6th ASCCS Int. Conf. on Steel-Concrete Composite Structures, Los Angeles, California, 927-934

Cited by

  1. Analytical Evaluation of Seismic Performance of RC Frames Rehabilitated Using FRP for Increased Ductility of Members vol.22, pp.5, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2008)22:5(276)
  2. Influence of concurrent horizontal and vertical ground excitations on the collapse margins of non-ductile RC frame buildings vol.59, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.59.4.653
  3. Seismic strengthening of rectangular reinforced concrete columns using fiber reinforced polymers vol.32, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.12.021
  4. Analytical investigation of the seismic performance of RC frames rehabilitated using different rehabilitation techniques vol.31, pp.9, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.048
  5. Strengthening and Retrofitting of the Industries Building After Fires vol.671-674, pp.1662-8985, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.671-674.778
  6. Maximum axial load level and minimum confinement for limited ductility design of high-strength concrete columns vol.6, pp.5, 2007, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2009.6.5.357
  7. Concurrent flexural strength and deformability design of high-performance concrete beams vol.40, pp.4, 2007, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2011.40.4.541
  8. Numerical simulation of bridge piers with spread footings under earthquake excitation vol.16, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2019.16.6.691