DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Photosynthetic Patterns of 3 Crassulacean Plants under Drought Conditions

  • 발행 : 2007.05.31

초록

Higher plants can be categorized as C3, C4 or CAM according to their photosynthetic pathways, and some succulent plants are known to shift their patterns of photosynthesis from C3 to CAM in response to environmental stresses such as salt treatment or water deficiency. To investigate fundamental photosynthetic patterns and the induction of pattern shifts (C3, CAM, C3-CAM etc.) as a result of environmental stresses, we measured the water content, diurnal changes in pH, net $CO_2$ exchange, transpiration rate, total ionic contents, and osmolality of Kalancoe daigremontiana, Sedum kamschaticum and Sedum sarmentosum which belong to Crassulaceae known as representative CAM plant, after 10 days of drought treatment. S. kamschaticum and S. sarmentosum did not show a significant difference in diurnal pH variation in the treatment and control conditions. However, the pH of drought-treated Kalancoe was low at night and high in the daytime, with a pH value between 4 and 5. Typical CAM plants display a net $CO_2$ exchange that increases at night and decreases in the daytime. Kalancoe displayed the predicted pattern. However, S. kamschaticum and S. sarmentosum showed a photosynthetic pattern more typical of C3 plants, and did not show changes in photosynthetic pattern under drought stress. Kalancoe also showed a transpiration rate typical for CAM pho-tosynthesis, whereas the transpiration rates of S. kamschaticum and S. sarmentosum were in the typical range for C3 photosynthesis. Kalancoe had high total ionic contents during the night, which decreased somewhat during the daytime, whereas S. kamschaticum and S. sarmentosum displayed the opposite pattern. This result is similar to the diurnal patterns of changes in pH in the three plant species, which suggests a relationship between pH and ionic contents. S. sarmentosum showed lower osmolality under drought stress than in the control condition, whereas the osmolality of Kalancoe and S. kamschaticum did not differ between conditions. S. sarmentosum may have maintained internal water content by lowering its osmolality and raising its total ionic contents. In conclusion, Kalancoe displayed the characteristic responses of a typical CAM plant, whereas S. kamschaticum and S. sarmentosum displayed aspects of the C3 photosynthetic pattern under drought conditions. These results suggest that S. kamschaticum and S. sarmentosum (Crassulacea) in Korea overcome drought stress by increasing solute and ionic contents internally rather than changing their photosynthetic pattern from C3 to CAM under drought stress.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Alarcon JJ, Sanchez-Blance MJ, Bolarin MC, Terrecillas A. 1993. Water relations and osmotic adjustment in Lycopersicon esculentum and L. pennellifolium during short-term salt exposure and recovery. Plant Physiol 89: 441-447 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1993.tb05196.x
  2. Bonner W, Bonner J. 1948. The role of carbon dioxide in acid formation by succulent plants. Am J Bot 35: 113-117 https://doi.org/10.2307/2437894
  3. Buchanan BB. 2002. Carbon reaction of photosynthesis. In: Plant Physiology (Taiz, L, Zeiger, E, eds). Sinauer Associates Inc, Sunderland. pp 154-156
  4. Chang NK, Lee KH, Kim HB. 1981. A study on characteristics of crassulacean acid metabolism in leaves and stems of Portulaca oleraceae L. Kor J Ecol 4: 114-123
  5. Chang NK, Jin CD. 1982. Characteristics of CAM and seasonal dimorphism in the succulent C4 dicot, Portulaca grandiflora Hook. Kor J Ecol 5: 89-99
  6. Chang NK, Lee SK. 1983. Studies on the Classification, productivity and distribution of C3, C4 and CAM plants in vegetation of Korea 2. Production and Productivity of C3 and C4 Type Plants. Kor J Ecol 6: 114-127
  7. Chang NK, Lee SK. 1983. Studies on the classification, productivity and distribution of C3, C4 and CAM plants in vegetation of Korea 3. Production and Productivity of C3 and C4 Type Plants. Kor J Ecol 6: 128-141
  8. Cuartero J, Yeo AR, Lowers TJ. 1992. Selection of donors for salt-tolerance in tomato using physiological traits. New Phytol 121: 63-69 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb01093.x
  9. Cui YY, Pandey DM, Hahn EJ, Paek KY. 2004. Effect of drought on physiological aspects of Crassulacean acid metabolism in Doritaenopsis. Plant Science 167: 1219-1226 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.06.011
  10. Dodd AN, Borland AM, Haslam RP, Griffiths H, Maxwell K. 2002. Crassulacean acid metabolism: plastic, fantastic. J Exp Bot 53: 569-580 https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/53.369.569
  11. Ehleringer JR, Monson RK. 1993. Evolutionary and ecological aspects of photosynthetic pathway variation. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 24: 411-439 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.24.110193.002211
  12. Guerrier G. 1996. Fluxes of $Na^{+}$, $K^{+}$ and $Cl^{-}$ and osmotic adjustment in Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium and L. esculentumduring shortand long-term exposure to NaCl. Physiol Plant 97: 583-591 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1996.tb00519.x
  13. Heyne B. 1815. On the deoxidation of the leaves of Cotyledon calycina. Trans Linn Soc Lond 11: 213-215 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1813.tb00051.x
  14. Holtum JAM, Winter K. 1982. Activity of enzymes of carbon metabolism during the induction of crassulacean acid metabolism in Mesembryanthemum crystallinum L. Planta 155: 8-16 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00402925
  15. Keeley JE. 1983. Crassulacean acid metabolism in the seasonally submerged aquatic Isoetes howellii. Oecologia 58: 57-62 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384542
  16. Kluge M, Ting IP. 1978. Crassulacean acid metabolism. Analysis of an ecological adaption. Springer Verlag, Berlin. pp209
  17. Luettge U. 1987. Carbon dioxide and water demand: Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM), a versatile ecological adaptation exemplifying the need for integration in ecophysiological work. New Phytol 106: 593-629 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1987.tb00163.x
  18. Luettge U. 1998. Crassulacean acid metabolism. In: Photosynthesis: A comprehensive treatise (Raghavendra AS, eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp 136-149
  19. Martin CE, Gravatt DA, Loeschen VS. 1994. Crassulacean acid metabolism in three species of Commelinaceae. Ann Bot 74: 457-463 https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1994.1141
  20. Osmond CB, Bender MM, Burris RH. 1976. Pathways of $CO_{2}$ fixation in the CAM plant Kalachoe daigremontiana: III Correlation with $\delta^{13}C$ value during growth and water stress. Aust J Plant Physiol 3: 787-799 https://doi.org/10.1071/PP9760787
  21. Osmond CB. 1978. Crassulacean acid metabolism: a curiosity in context. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 29: 379-414 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.29.060178.002115
  22. Rayder L, Ting IP. 1983. CAM-idling in Hoya carnosa (Asclepiadaceae). Photosynth Res 4: 203-211 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00052124
  23. Reddy AR, Sunder D, Gnanam A. 2003. Photosynthetic flexibility in Pedilanthus tithymaloidespoit, a CAM plant. J Plant Physiol 160: 75-80 https://doi.org/10.1078/0176-1617-00851
  24. Sipes D, Ting IP. 1985. CAM and CAM modification in Peperomia camptotricha. Plant Physiol 77: 59-63 https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.77.1.59
  25. Strogonov BP. 1973. Structure and function of plant cells in saline habitats. Willey, New York. pp 503
  26. Szarek SR, Johnson HB, Ting IP. 1973. Drought adaptation in Opuntia basilaris. Plant Physiol 52: 539-541 https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.52.6.539
  27. Teeri JA. 1982. Photosynthetic variation in the Crassulaceae. In: Crassulacean Acid Metabolism (Ting, IP, Gibbs, M eds). pp 224- 259
  28. Ting IP, Hanscom Z. 1977. Induction of acid metabolism in Portulacaria afra.. Plant Physiol 59: 511-514 https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.59.3.511
  29. Ting IP. 1985. Crassulacean acid metabolism. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 36: 595-622 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.36.060185.003115
  30. Winter K. 1979. Effect of different $CO_{2}$ regimes on the induction of crassulacean acid metabolism in Mesembryanthemum crystallinum. J Plant Physiol 6: 598-594
  31. Winter K. 1985. Crassulacean acid metabolism. In: Photosynthetic mechanism and the environment (Barber J, Baker NR, eds.). The Netherlands, Amsterdam. pp 329-387
  32. Winter K, Smith JAC. 1996. In: Crassulacean acid metabolism (Winter, K, Smith, JAC eds). Biochemistry, ecophysiology and evolution. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. pp 1-13
  33. Woerner AC, Martin CE. 1999. Mechanistic basis of differences in water use efficiency between a CAM and a C3 species of Peperomia (Piperaceae). New Phytol 144: 307-312 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00525.x