Journal of Ecology and Environment

한국생태학회 (The Ecological Society of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Partial Habitat Restoration by a Method Suitable for Riverine Environments in Korea

  • Lee, Chang-Seok (Faculty of Environment and Life Sciences, Seoul Women's University) ;
  • Cho, Yong-Chan (Faculty of Environment and Life Sciences, Seoul Women's University) ;
  • Shin, Hyun-Cheol (Faculty of Environment and Life Sciences, Seoul Women's University) ;
  • Lee, Seon-Mi (Faculty of Environment and Life Sciences, Seoul Women's University) ;
  • Cho, Hyun-Je (Keimyung University)
  • 발행 : 2007.05.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Korean rivers and their surrounding environments have been used excessively for rice production in the past and more recently for construction of urban areas to accomodate the rapidly increasing population. Affected Korean rivers experience dramatic fluctuations in their water levels and have faster currents compared with those in other countries. In order to restore more natural conditions in rivers experiencing such conditions, we employed a partial restoration method, which is designed to achieve physical and biological stability simultaneously. Concrete blocks were introduced to increase the river's physical stability during floods, and terra cottem, a soil enhancer, was used to reduce water loss due to intense heat. These interventions increased the river's ability to hold water and thereby promoted plant growth. This restoration method increased vegetation coverage and species diversity in treated areas, and changed the species composition in treated areas to more closely approximate that of the control site. These results suggest that this method is effective in restoring damaged habitats to more natural conditions.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bisson PA, Quinn TP, Reeves GH, Gregory SV. 1992. Best management practices, cumulative effect, and long-term trends in fish abundance in Pacific Northwest river systems. In: Watershed management: Balancing sustainability and environmental change (Naiman RJ ed). Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 189-232
  2. Bradshaw AD. 1984. Ecological principles and land reclamation practice. Landscape plan 11: 35-48 https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3924(84)90016-9
  3. Braun-Blanquet J. 1964. Pflanzensoziologie. Grundze der Vegetaionskunde. Springer-Verlag. Wien
  4. Cairns J Jr. 1989. Restoring damaged ecosystems: Is predisturbance condition a viable option? The Environ Prof 11: 152-159
  5. Carothers SW, Johnson RR, Aitchison SW. 1974. Population structure and social organization of the southwestern riparian birds. American Zoologist 14: 97-108 https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/14.1.97
  6. Cooke JG, Cooper AB. 1988. Sources and sinks of nutrients in a New Zealand hill pasture catchment. III. Nitrogen. Hydrol Process 2: 135-149 https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360020204
  7. Ebersole JL, Liss WJ, Frissell CA. 1997. Restoration of stream habitats in the western United States: Restoration as re-expression of habitat capacity. Environ Manag 21: 1-14 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002679900001
  8. Ewel JJ 1987. Restoration is the ultimate test of ecological theory. In: Restoration Ecology: A Synthetic Approach to Ecological Research (Jordan, WR, Gilpin ME, and Aber, AD. eds). Cambridge Press, Cambridge, pp 31-33
  9. Frissell CA, Bayles D. 1996. Ecosystem management and the conservation of aquatic biodiversity and ecological integrity. J Am Water Resour Asn 32: 229-240 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1996.tb03447.x
  10. Frissell CA, Ralph SC. 1998. Stream and watershed restoration. In: River ecology and management (Naiman RJ, Bilby RE. eds). Springer, New York, pp 599-624
  11. Fustec E, Mariott A, Grillo X, Sajus J. 1991. Nitrate removal by denitrification in alluvial groundwater: role of a former channel. J Hydrology 123: 337-354 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(91)90098-3
  12. Gregory SV, Swanson FJ, McKee WA, Cummins KW. 1991. An ecosystem perspective of riparian zones. BioScience 41: 540-551 https://doi.org/10.2307/1311607
  13. Grove RH, Burdon JJ. 1986. Ecology of biological invasions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  14. Haycock NE, Burt TP. 1990. Handling excess nitrates. Nature 348: 29
  15. Haycock NE, Burt TP. 1991. The sensitivity of rivers to nitrate leaching; the effectiveness of near-stream land as a nutrient retention zone. In: Landscape sensitivity (Allison RJ, Thomas DSG. eds). John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 261-271
  16. Hedgpeth JW. 1993. Foreign invaders. Science 261: 34-35 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.261.5117.34
  17. Hey RD. 1995. Environmentally sensitive river engineering. In: River restoration (Petts GE, Calow P, eds). Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 80-105
  18. Hobbs RJ, Huenneke LF. 1992. Disturbance, diversity, and invasion: Implications for conservation. Conserv Biol 6: 324-337 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.06030324.x
  19. Howard-Williams C, Pickmere S, Davies J. 1986. Nutrient retention and processing in New Zealand streams: the influence of riparian vegetation. New Zeal Agr Sci 20: 110-114
  20. Johnson RR, Simpson JM. 1971. Important birds from Blue Point cottonwoods, Maricopa County, Arizona. Condor 73: 379-380 https://doi.org/10.2307/1365771
  21. Johnstone IM. 1986. Plant invasion windows: a time-based classification of invasion potential. Biol Rev 61: 369-394 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1986.tb00659.x
  22. Karr JR. 1996. Ecological integrity and ecological health are not the same. In: Engineering within ecological constraints (Schulze P, ed). National Academy, Washington, DC, pp. 100-113
  23. Kauffman JB, Beschta RL, Otting N, Lytjen D. 1997. An ecological perspective of riparian and stream restoration in the western United States. Fisheries 22: 12-24 https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8446(1997)022<0012:AEPORA>2.0.CO;2
  24. KICT (Korean Institute of Civil Engineering Technology). 2002. Development of technology to restore the natural river harmonious with circumstances of Korea. KICT, Seoul
  25. Lee CS, Cho HJ, Yi H. 2004. Stand dynamics of introduced black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) plantation under different disturbance regimes in Korea. Forest Ecol Manag 189/1-3: 281-293 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2003.09.006
  26. Lee CS, Woo HS. 2006. Futuristic direction of river restoration in Asian countries under changing climate regime. Proceedings of the fourth annual joint seminar between Korean and Japan on Ecology and Civil Engineering held in Honam University, Gwangju Metropolitan City, Korea from 16 to 18 July, 2006, 'Restoration of Streams and Wetlands in Urban and Suburban Areas'. pp. 17-30
  27. Lee CS, You YH. 2001. Creation of an environmental forest as an ecological restoration. Korean J Ecol 24: 101-109
  28. Lee HS, Yoo HM, Lee CS. 2003. Distribution pattern of white snakeroot as an invasive alien plant and restoration strategy to inhibit its expansion in Seoripool park, Seoul. Korean J Biol Sci 7: 197-205 https://doi.org/10.1080/12265071.2003.9647705
  29. Lee HW, Lee CS. 2006. Environmental factors affecting establishment and expansion of the invasive alien species of tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissima) in Seoripool Park, Seoul. Integrative Biosciences 10: 27-40
  30. Lee JS. 2004. Understanding on natural disaster. Gumiseogwan Pub Co, Seoul (In Korean)
  31. Magurran AE. 2004. Measuring Biological Diversity. Blackwell Publishing, Massachusetts
  32. Meffe GK, Carroll CR, Pimm SL. 1997. Community- and ecosystemlevel conservation: species interactions, disturbance regimes, and invading species. In: Principles of conservation biology (Meffe GE, Carroll CR, Eds). Sinauer Associates, Inc. Pub., Sunderland, Massachusetts, pp. 236-267
  33. Petts G, Calow P (eds). 1996. River restoration. Blackwell Science, London
  34. Pinay GH, Decamps H. 1988. The role of riparian woods in regulating nitrogen fluxes between the alluvial aquifer and surface water: a conceptual model. Regulated Rivers: Res Manag 2: 507-516 https://doi.org/10.1002/rrr.3450020404
  35. Salinas MJ, Guirado J. 2002. Riparian plant restoration in summer-dry riverbeds of Southeastern Spain. Res Ecol 10: 695-702 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100X.2002.01050.x
  36. SAS Institute. 2001. PROC user's manual, version 6th ed. SAS Institute, Cary, NC
  37. Sear DA. 1994. River restoration and geomorphology. Aquatic Conservation: Freshwater and Marine Ecosystems 4: 169-177 https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3270040207