The Korean Journal of Cytopathology (대한세포병리학회지)

The Korean Society for Cytopathology (대한세포병리학회)
권호 표지

Misinterpretation of Pregnancy Related Changes - Effect on the Postpartum Regression Rate of Abnormal Cervical Smears in Pregnancy -

임신성 세포변화의 판독오류 - 임신 중 비정상 자궁목 세포검사의 분만 후 퇴행률에 미치는 영향 -

  • Kim, Hye-Sun (Department of Pathology, Cheil General Hospital & Women's Healthcare Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • 김혜선 (성균관대학교 제일병원 병리과)
  • Published : 2007.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

An aim of this study was to evaluate an effect of misinterpretation of pregnancy related cellular changes on the postpartum regression rate of abnormal cervical smears in pregnancy. A series of 265 cases with abnormal cervical smears in pregnancy were selected from a database of cervical smear results. The selected cases were classified as regression, persistence, and progression based on the results of postpartum cervical smears and histology. Of the selected cases, 162 cases were classified as regression and the postpartum regression rate was 61.1% (162/265). We reviewed abnormal cervical smears in pregnancy these cases. The primary cytologic diagnoses of these cases were ASCUS (118 cases), AGUS (2 cases), ASCUS/AGUS (1 case), LSIL (25 cases), LSIL R/O HSIL (2 cases), and HSIL (14 cases). With information of the pregnacy, we identified decidual cells in 24 cases, but cells identified by the Arias-Stella reaction and trophoblasts were not found. Sixteen cases out of 162 cases were reclassified as a pregnancy related change rather than an abnormal. Desidual cells were considered as ASCUS in 15 cases and as LSIL in one case. The revised postpartum regression rate was 55.5%(147/265) and was lower than the original. Consequently, misinterpretation of the pregnancy related cellular changes has an effect on a rise of the postpartum regression rate of the abnormal cervical smear in pregnancy. Pathologists may diagnose pregnancy related cellular changes as abnormal findings if they do not have information regarding the pregnancy. Therefore, clinical information of pregnancy and knowledge about the pregnancy related cellular changes are essential to prevent misinterpretation.

Keywords

References

  1. Kiguchi K, Bibbo M, Hasegawa T, Kurihara S, Tsutsui F, Wied GL. Dysplasia during pregnancy: a cytologic follow-up study. J Reprod Med 1981;26:66-72
  2. Campion MJ, Sedlacek TV. Colposcopy in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1993;20:153-63
  3. Palle C, Bangsboll S, Andreasson B. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000;79:306-10 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0412.2000.079004306.x
  4. Kaplan KJ, Dainty LA, Dolinsky B, et al. Prognosis and risk for patients with cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions diagnosed during pregnancy. Cancer Cytopathol 2004;102:228-32 https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20428
  5. Ueki M, Ueda M, Kumagai K, Okamoto Y, Noda S, Matsuoka M. Cervical cytology and conservative management of cervical neoplasia during pregnancy. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1995;14:63-9 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004347-199501000-00011
  6. Kashimura M, Matsuura Y, Shinohara M, et al. Comparative study of cytology and punch biopsy in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia during pregnancy. A preliminary report. Acta Cytol 1991;35:100-4
  7. Yost NP, Santoso JT, Mcintire DD, Iliya FA. Postpartum regression rates of antepartum cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II and III Lesions. Obstet Gynecol 1999;93:359-62 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00483-9
  8. Ahdoot D, Van Nostrand KM, Nguyen NJ, et al. The effect of route of delivery on regression of abnormal cervical cytoloigc findings in the postpartum period. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;178:1116-20 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70310-2
  9. Paraskevaidis E, Koliopoulos G, Kalantaridou S, et al. Management and evolution of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia during pregnancy and postpartum. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2002;104:67-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-2115(02)00058-1
  10. Coppola A, Sorosky J, Casper R, Anderson B, Buller RE. The clinical course of cervical carcinoma in situ diagnosed during pregnancy. Gynecol Oncol 1997;67:162-5 https://doi.org/10.1006/gyno.1997.4856
  11. Schneider V. Arias-Stella reaction of the endocervix. Acta Cytol 1981;25:224-8
  12. Schneider V, Barnes LA. Ectopic decidual reaction of the uterine cervix. Acta Cytol 1981;25:616-22
  13. Naib ZM. Single trophoblastic cells as a source of error in the interpretation of routine vaginal smear. Cancer 1961;14:1183-5 https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(196111/12)14:6<1183::AID-CNCR2820140607>3.0.CO;2-K
  14. Danos ML. Post partum cytology: observations over a four year period. Acta Cytol 1968;12:309-12
  15. Soloway HB. Vaginal and cervical cytology of the early puerperium. Acta Cytol 1969;13:136-8
  16. Shrago SS. The Arias Stella reaction: a case report of a cytologic presentation. Acta Cytol 1977;21:310-3
  17. Kobayashi TK, Yuasa M, Fujimoto T, Fukuda M, Harami K, Hayashi K. Cytologic findings in postpartum and postabortal smears. Acta Cytol 1980;24:328-34
  18. Murad TM, Terhart K, Flint A. Atypical cells in pregnancy and postpartum smears. Acta Cytol 1981;25:623-30
  19. Pisharodi LR, Jovanoska S. Spectrum of cytologic changes in pregnancy. Acta Cytol 1995;39:905-8
  20. Benoit JL, Kini SR. 'Arias-Stella reaction'-like changes in endocervical glandular epithelium in cervical smears during pregnancy and postpartum states: a potential diagnostic pitfall. Diagn Cytopathol 1996;14:349-55 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0339(199605)14:4<349::AID-DC13>3.0.CO;2-K
  21. Yates WA, Persad RV, Stanbridge CM. The Arias-Stella reaction in the cervix: a case report with cervical cytology. Cytopathol 1997;8:40-4 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2303.1997.45375453.x
  22. Michael CW, Esfahani FM. Pregnancy-related changes: a retrspective review of 278 cervical smears. Diagn Cytopathol 1997;17:99-107 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0339(199708)17:2<99::AID-DC4>3.0.CO;2-J
  23. Kobayashi TK, Okamoto H. Cytopathology of pregnancyinduced cell patterns in cervicovaginal smears. Am J Clin Pathol 2000;114(Suppl 1):S6-S20
  24. Chun YK, Chang HS, Kim HS, et al. Pregnancy-related cytologic changes in cervicovaginal smears. Korean J Cytopathol 2004;15:92-100
  25. Cove H. The Arias-Stella reation occuriing in the endocervix in pregnancy. Am J Surg Pathol 1979;3:567-8 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-197912000-00011