Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

THE EFFECT OF INTERMITTENT COMPOSITE CURING ON MARGINAL ADAPTATION

복합레진의 간헐적 광중합 방법이 변연적합도에 미치는 영향

  • Yun, Yong-Hwan (Department of Conservative Dentistry, The Gaduate School, Yonsei University) ;
  • Park, Sung-Ho (Department of Conservative Dentistry, The Gaduate School, Yonsei University)
  • 윤용환 (연세대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 박성호 (연세대학교 치과대학 보존학교실)
  • Published : 2007.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The aim of this research was to study the effect of intermittent polymerization on marginal adaptation by comparing the marginal adaptation of intermittently polymerized composite to that of continuously polymerized composite. The materials used for this study were Pyramid (Bisco Inc., Schaumburg, U.S.A.) and Heliomolar (Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein) . The experiment was carried out in class II MOD cavities prepared in 48 extracted human maxillary premolars. The samples were divided into 4 groups by light curing method: group 1- continuous curing (60s light on with no light off), group 2-intermittent curing (cycles of 3s with 2s light on & 1s light off for 90s); group 3- intermittent curing (cycles of 2s with 1s light on & 1s light off for 120s); group 4- intermittent curing (cycles of 3s with 1s light on & 2s light off for 180s). Consequently the total amount of light energy radiated was same in all the groups. Each specimen went through thermo-mechanical loading (TML) which consisted of mechanical loading (720,000 cycles, 5.0 kg) with a speed of 120 rpm for 100hours and thermocycling (6000 thermocycles of alternating water of $50^{\circ}C$ and $55^{\circ}C$). The continuous margin (CM) (%) of the total margin and regional margins, occlusal enamel (OE), vertical enamel (VE), and cervical enamel (CE) was measured before and after TML under a $\times200$ digital light microscope. Three-way ANOVA and Duncan's Multiple Range Test was performed at 95% level of confidence to test the effect of 3 variables on CM (%) of the total margin: light curing conditions, composite materials and effect of TML. In each group, One-way ANOVA and Duncan's Multiple Range Test was additionally performed to compare CM (%) of regions (OE, VE CE). The results indicated that all the three variables were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Before TML, in groups using Pyramid, groups 3 and 4 showed higher CM (%) than groups 1 and 2, and in groups using Heliomolar. groups 3 and 4 showed higher CM (%) than group 1 (p < 0.05). After TML, in both Pyramid and Heliomo)ar groups, group 3 showed higher CM (%) than group 1 (p < 0.05) CM (%) of the regions are significantly different in each group (p < 0.05). Before TML, no statistical difference was found between groups within the VE and CE region. In the OE region, group 4 of Pyramid showed higher CM (%) than group 2, and groups 2 and 4 of Heliomolar showed higher CM (%) than group 1 (p < 0.05). After TML, no statistical difference was found among groups within the VE and CE region. In the OE region, group 3 of Pyramid showed higher CM (%) than groups 1 and 2, and groups 2,3 and 4 of Heliomolar showed higher CM (%) than group 1 (p < 0.05). It was concluded that intermittent polymerization may be effective in reducing marginal gap formation.

이 실험의 목적은 광중합복합 레진을 자체 제작한 광조사 차단 장치를 이용하여 간헐적 광중합시켜 기존의 연속 중합법과 변연적합도를 비교함으로써 간헐적 광중합의 영향을 알아 보는 것이다. 이번 실험에 사용된 재료는 Pyramid (Bisco, Schaumburg, U.S.A)와 Heliomolar (Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein)이다. 발치된 상악 소구치에 class II MOD 와동 형성 후 위 두 재료를 bulk 충전하고 다음의 중합cycle에 따라 중합시켰다: 제1군- 연속 광중합 (60초간 계속 광조사); 제2군-2초 광조사, 1초 광차단 (90초 시행); 제3군- 1초 광조사 1초 광차단 (120초 시행); 제4군- 1초 광조사, 2초 광차단 (180초 시행). 저작재현장치 (R&B, Daejeon, Korea)로 720000회의 운동횟수, 분당 120의 회전속도, $5^{\circ}C$와 $55^{\circ}C$의 물을 교대로 치아에 6000회 주사하면서 5.0 kg의 하중을 치아에 적용하였고 실험 전후 변연적합도를 전체와 부위별 변연으로 나누어서 $\times200$배율의 광학 현미경으로 측정하였다. 부위별 변연은 교합면, 인접면, 치은면 등 세 부위로 나누어서 법랑질 변연을 측정하였다. 전체 변연적합도에서 각 군간, 재료간, 저작 운동 전후 차이를 보기 위해 three-way ANOVA와 Duncan's multiple range test를 시행하였고, 부위별 변연적합도에서는 각 군에서 부위별 차이와 각 부위에서 군간 차이를 보기 위해 각각 one-way ANOVA와 Duncan's multiple range test를 시행하였다 (95% 유의수준). 전체 변연적합도를 보면, 저작 운동 전에는 Pyramid의 경우 3, 4군이 1,2군에 비해, Heliomolar의 경우 3.4군이 1군에 비해 전체 변연적합도가 우수하였고, 저작 운동 후에는 Pyramid. Heliomolar모두 3군이 1군에 비해 전체 변연적합도가 우수하였다 (p < 0.05). 재료간 비교에서는 저작 운동 잔에는 2군에서 Heliomolar가 Pyramid보다 변연적합도가 우수하였고 (p < 0.05) 그 외의 군에서는 유의차가 없었으며, 저작 운동 후에는 모든 군에서 재료간 유의차가 없었다. 각 부위별 변연적합도를 비교하면, 저작 운동 전 Pyramid에서는 교합면 변연에서는 4군이 2군에 비해 높은 변연적합도를 보였고 (p < 0.05), 인접면과 치은면에서는 군 간 유의차를 보이지 않았다. Heliomolar에서는 교합면 변연에서 2, 4군이 1군에 비해 높은 변연적합도를 보였고 (p < 0.05), 인접면과 치은면에서는 군간 유의차를 보이지 않았다. 저작 운동 후 Pyramid에서는 교합면 변연에서는 3군이 1, 2군에 비해 높은 변연적합도를 보였고 (p < 0.05), 인접면과 치은면에서는 군간 유의차를 보이지 않았다. Heliomolar에서는 교합면에서 2, 3, 4군이 1군에 비해 변연적합도가 높았으며 (p < 0.05), 인접면과 치은면에서는 군간 유의차를 보이지 않았다 이번 연구를 통하여 복합레진을 간헐적 광중합시킴으로써 변연적합도가 향상될 수 있음을 알 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Burke FJ. Light-activated composites. the current status. Dent Update 12: 182. 184-188. 1985
  2. Feilzer AJ. De Gee AJ and Davidson CL. Curing contraction of composites and glass ionomer cements. J Prosthet Dent 59:297-300, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90176-X
  3. Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M and Pashley DH. A review of polymerization contraction: The influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent 21: 17-24, 1996
  4. Hansen EK. Visible light-cured composite resins: polymerization contraction, contraction pattern and hygroscopic expansion. Scan J Dent Res 90(4):329-35, 1982
  5. Suliman AA, Boyer DB and Lakes RS. Cusp movement in premolars resulting from composite polymerization shrinkage. Dent Mater 9:6-10, Jan. 1993 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(93)90096-9
  6. Unterbrink GL and Muessner R. Influence of light intensity on two restorative system. J Dent 23: 183-189, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(95)93577-O
  7. Goracci G, Mori G and De Martinis LC. Curing light intensity and marginal leakage of resin composite restorations. Quintessence Int 27:355-362, 1996
  8. Mehl A. Hickel R and Kunzelmann KH. Physical properties and gap formation of a light-cured composites with and without 'softstart-polymerization'. J Dent 25:321-330, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00044-9
  9. Kanca J and Suh BI. Pulse activation. Reducing resinbased composite contraction stresses at the enamel cavosurface margins. Am J Dent 12: 107-112, 1999
  10. Alonso RCB, Cunha LG, Correr GM. Association of photoactivation methods and low modulus liners on marginal adaptation of composite restoration. Acta Odontol Scand 62:298-304, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1080/00016350410001784
  11. Rueggeberg F. Contemporary issues in photocuring. Compendium 20:S4-S15, 1999
  12. Obici AC, Sinhoreti MAG, Goes MF, Consani S, Sobrinho LC. Effect of photo-activation method on polymerization shrinkage of restorative composites. Oper Dent 27:192-8, 2002
  13. 김민경, 이찬영. 복합 레진의 간헐적 광중합 방법이 중합 수축속도. 미세경도 및 치아의 교두 변위에 미치는 영향. 연세대학교 치과대학 대학원 박사학위논문집 2004
  14. 이순영, 박성호. 광중합형 구치부 수복재료의 중합 수축력과 교두 변위의 상관 관계. 대한치과보존학회지 29:346-352, 2004
  15. Krejci I. Lutz F, Reimer M. Marginal adaptation and fit of adhesive ceramic inlays. J Dent 21:39-46. 1993 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(93)90048-U
  16. 박성호, 정일영, 이권용. 저작재현장치의 개발. 대한치과보존학회지 28:34-40, 2003
  17. Luescher B, Lutz F. Obschenbein Hand Muehlemann HR: Microleakage and marginal adaptation in conventional and adhesive class II restorations. J Prosthet Dent 37:300-309, 1977 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(77)90072-5
  18. Dietschi D, Bindi G. Marginal and internal adaptation of stratified compomer-compostie class II restorations. Oper Dent 27:500-509, 2002
  19. 최인복, 박성호. 복합 레진을 이용한 간접수복에서 기저재가 변연 적합성에 미치는 영향. 연세대학교 치과대학 대학원 석사학위논문, 2003
  20. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ. Davidson CL. Quantitative determination of stress reduction by flow in composite restorations. Dent Mater 6: 167-71, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(90)90023-8
  21. Davidson CL. de Gee AJ. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stress by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res 63: 146-8. 1984 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345840630021001
  22. Uno S, Asmussen E. Marginal adaptation of restorative resin polymerized at reduced rate. Scand J Dent Res 99:440-8, 1991
  23. Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent 25:435-440, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00063-2
  24. Alvarez-Gayosso C, Barcelo-Santana F, GuerreroIbarra J, Saes-Espinola G and Canseco-Martinez MA. Calculation of contraction rates due to shrinkage in light-cured composites. Dent Mater 20(3) :228-35, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00097-6
  25. Shimada Y, Tagami J. Effects of regional enamel and prism orientation on resin bonding. Operative Dentistry 27:20-27, 2003
  26. 정완, 박성호. The effect of additional etching on the marginal adaptation of self etching adhesives: evaluation through thermo-mechanical loading. 연세대학교 치과대학 대학원 석사 학위논문, 2005

Cited by

  1. Effect of the exponential curing of composite resin on the microtensile dentin bond strength of adhesives vol.35, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.2.125