DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

EVALUATION ON THE ABRASION RESISTANCE OF A SURFACE SEALANT

레진전색제의 마모저항성에 대한 평가

  • Kim, Soo-Mee (Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Seonam University) ;
  • Han, Sae-Hee (Dental Center, Chung Ang University Hospital) ;
  • Cho, Young-Gon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
  • 김수미 (서남대학교 의과대학 치과학교실) ;
  • 한세희 (중앙대학교 병원 치과센터 치과보존과) ;
  • 조영곤 (조선대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실)
  • Published : 2007.05.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the abrasion resistance of surface penetrating sealant which was applied on a composite resin restoration and to provide proper time to reapply sealant on composite resin surface. Two hundred rectangular specimens, sized $8\times3\times2mm$, were made of Micronew (Bisco, Inc., Schaumburg, IL, U.S.A) and divided into two groups; F group (n = 10) was finished with coarse and medium grit of Sof-Lex discs and BisCoverwas applied B group (n = 190) after finishing with discs. B group was again subdivided into nineteen subgroups From B-1 group to B-18 group were subjected to toothbrush abrasion test using a distilled water-dentifrice slurry and toothbrush heads B-IM group was not subjected to toothbrush abrasion test. Average surface roughness (Ra) of each group was calculated using a surface roughness tester (Surfcorder MSE-1700: Kosaka Laboratory Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) . A representative specimen of each group was examined by FE-SEM (S-4700: Hitachi High Technologies Co., Tokyo, Japan). The data were analysed using cluster analysis, paired t-test, and repeated measure ANOVA. The results of this study were as follows; 1. Ra off group was $0.898{\pm}0.145{\mu}m$ and B-IM group was $0.289{\pm}0.142{\mu}m$. Ra became higher from B-1 group $(0.299{\pm}0.48{\mu}m$ to B-18 group $(0.642{\pm}0.313{\mu}m$. 2. Final cluster center of Ra was $0.361{\mu}m$ in cluster 1 $(B-IM\simB-7)$, $0.511{\mu}m$ in cluster 2 $(B-8\simB-14)$ and $0.624{\mu}m$ in cluster 3 ($(B-15\simB-18)$. There were significant difference among Ra of three clusters. 3 Ra of B-IM group was decreased 210.72% than Ra of F group. Ra of B-8 group and B-15 group was increased 35.49% and 51.35% respectively than Ra of B-IM group. 4. On FE-SEM, B-IM group showed the smoothest resin surface. B-8 group and B-15 group showed vertically shallow scratches , and wide and irregular vertical scratches on composite resin surface respectively. Within a limitation of this study, finished resin surface will be again smooth and glazy if BisCover would be reapplied within 8 to 14 months after applying to resin surface.

이 연구는 강화형 미세입자 복합레진인 Micronew에 Biscover 레진전색제를 적용한 후 칫솔마모시험을 시행하여 복합레진 표면의 조도와 현미경적 변화를 비교함으로써 레진전색제를 복합레진 표면에 재적용할 시기를 알아보고자 하였다. 분리 가능한 알루미늄 판과 복합레진을 이용하여 $8\times3\times2mm$ 크기의 복합레진 시편 200개를 제작하였다. 복합레진 시편의 양쪽표면을 Sof-Lex disc로 거친 입자에서 중간 입자까지 마무리한 후 실온의 증류수에 24시간 동안 보관하였다. 시편은 disc로 마무리만 시행한 F군 (n = 10)과 마무리 후 레진전색제인 Biscover를 적용한 B군 (n = 190)으로 분류하였다. B군은 다시 칫솔질을 가하지 않은 B-IM군 (n = 10)과 칫솔질을 가한 군 (n = 180, B-1군에서 B-18 군)으로 분류하였다. 칫솔질을 가한 군은 칫솔마모검사기의 수조에 페리오 치약과 증류수를 무게 비 50 : 50으로 혼합하여 부은 다음, 홈이 파진 알루미늄 블록에 각 군의 시편을 위치시키고 칫솔을 고정장치에 부착하여 전, 후 왕복운동을 가하여 칫솔질을 가하였다. 칫솔질은 B-1 군에서 B-18군 까지 각각 900회씩 증가시켜 16,200회 까지 시행하였다 표면조도측정기를 사용하여 각 군의 복합레진 표면의 평균 표면조도 값 (Ra)을 산출한 후 통계적으로 분석하였고, 주사전자현미경하에서 각 군의 대표적인 시편 1개를 관찰하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. F군의 Ra는 $0.898{\pm}0.145{\mu}m$, B-IM군의 Ra는 $0.289{\pm}0.142{\mu}m$를 나타냈으며, B-1 군에서 B-18 군까지의 Ra는 점차적으로 증가하여 B-1 군에서 $0.299{\pm}0.48{\mu}m$, B-18 군에서 $0.642{\pm}0.313{\mu}m$까지 나타났다. 2. Ra 최종 군집중심은 군집 1 $(B-IM\simB-7)$에서 $0.361{\mu}m$, 군집 2 $(B-8\simB-14)$에서 $0.511{\mu}m$, 군집 3 $(B-15\simB-18)$에서 $0.624{\mu}m$를 나타내어 각 군집의 Ra 최종 군집중심 간에 통계학적으로 유의한 차이를 나타내었다. (F = 49.705, p = 0.000) 3. B-IM군의 Ra 증감율은 F 군에 비해 210.72%감소되었으며, B-8 군과 B-15군의 Ra 증감율은 B-IM군에 비해 각각 35.49%와 51.35% 증가되었다. 4. FE-SEM 관찰에서 B-IM 군은 매우 평활한 복합레진 표면을 나타내었고, B-8 군은 전체적으로 평활한 복합레진 표면을 보였지만 표면에 수직으로 아주 얕은 흠집을 나타내었다. B-15 군은 복합레진 표면의 중앙에서 B-8군보다 더 넓고 불규칙한 수직의 흠집을 나타내었고, B-18군은 복합레진 표면 전체에 넓은 흠집을 나타내었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Hoelscher DC. Neme AML. Pink FE. Hughes PJ. The Effect of three finishing systems on four esthetic restorative materials. Oper Dent 23:36-42. 1998
  2. Turkun LS. Turkun M. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials. Oper Dent 29:203-211. 2004
  3. Joint SB. Gregoire GL. Auther AM, Roques YM. Three-dimensional optical profilometry analysis of surface states obtained after finishing sequences for three composite resins, Oper Dent 25:311-315, 2000
  4. Yap AUJ. Yap SH. Teo CK. Ng JJ, Comparison of sur-face finish of new aesthetic restorative materials. Oper Dent 29:100-104. 2004
  5. 이재용, 신동훈. 전. 구치 겸용 혼합형 복합레진의 두 가지 연마법에 따른 표면조도. 대한치과보존학회지 28:369-377. 2003
  6. Yap AUJ, Yap SH, Teo CK. Ng JJ. Finshing/polishing of composite and compomer restoratives: effectiveness of one-step systems. Oper Dent 29:275-279, 2004
  7. Fruits TJ, Miranda FJ, Coury TL. Effects of equivalent abrasive grit sizes utilizing different polishing motions on selected restorative materials. Quint lnt 27: 279-285. 1996
  8. Filho NH, D' Azevedo MTFS, Nagem HD. Marsola FP. Surface roughness of composite resins after finishing and polishing. Braz Dent J 14:37-41. 2003 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402003000100007
  9. Roeder LB, Tate WH, Powers JM. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of packable composites, Oper Dent 25:534-543. 2000
  10. Turssi CP, Saad JRC, Duarte SLL, Rodrigues AL. Composite surfaces after finishing and polishing techniques. Am J Dent 13:136-138, 2000
  11. Lu H. Roeder LB, Powers JM. Effect of polishing systems on the surface roughness of microhybrid composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 15:297-304. 2003 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2003.tb00300.x
  12. Ryba TM, Dunn WJ, Murchison DF. Surface roughness of various packable composites. Oper Dent 27: 243-247, 2002
  13. Tate WH, Powers JM. Surface roughness of composites and hybrid ionomers. Oper Dent 21: 53-58. 1996
  14. Reis AF, Giannini M, Lovadino JR, dos Santos Dias CT. The effect of six polishing systems on the surface roughness of two packable resin-based composites, Am J Dent 15:193-197, 2002
  15. Setcos JC. Tarim B, Suzuki S. Surface finish produced on resin composites by new polishing systems. Quint lnt 30:169-173, 1999
  16. Erhardt MCG, Magalhaes CS, Serra MC. The effect of rebonding on microleakage of class V aesthetic restorations, Oper Dent 27: 396-402, 2002
  17. May KNJr, Swift EJJr, Wilder AD. Futrell SC. Effect of a surface sealant on microleakage of Class V restorations. Am J Dent 9: 133-136, 1996
  18. Doray PG, Eldiwany MS. Powers JM. Effect of resin surface sealers on improvement of stain resistance for a composite provisional material. J Esthet Restor Dent 15:244-250. 2003 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2003.tb00292.x
  19. Kawai K. Leinfelder KF. Effect of surface penetrating sealant on composite wear. Dent Mater 9:103-113. 1993
  20. Ramos RP. Chinelatti MA. Chimello DT. Dibb RGP. Assessing microleakage in resin composite restorations rebonded with a surface sealant and three low-viscosity resin systems. Quint Int 23:450-456, 2002
  21. Ramos RP, Chimello DT, Chinelatti MA. Dibb RGP. Mondelli J. Effect of three surface sealants on marginal sealing of class V composite resin restorations. Oper Dent 25:448-453, 2000
  22. Dickinson GL. Leinfelder KF. Assessing the long-term effect of a surface penetrating sealant. J Am Dent Assoc 124:68-72, 1993 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1993.0265
  23. Garman TA. Fairhurst CW, Heuer GA. Williams HA. Beglau DL. A comparison of glazing materials for composite restorations. J Am Dent Assac 95: 950-956, 1977 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1977.0170
  24. 조영곤, 최희영. 복합레진 수복물의 변연 미세누출에 관한 $Biscover^{TM}$ 전색제의 효과. 대한치과보존학회지 30:355-364, 2005
  25. Barghi N. Alexander C. A new surface sealant for polishing composite resin restorations. Campend Cantin Educ Dent 24:30-33. 2003
  26. Suh BI. A new resin technology: a glaze/composite sealant that cures without forming an oxygen-inhibited layer. Campend Cantin Educ Dent 24:27-29. 2003
  27. Teixeira EC, Thompson JL. Jeffrey RP. Thompson JY. In vitro toothbrush-dentifrice abrasion of two restorative composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 17: 172-180, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2005.tb00109.x
  28. Wang L. Garcia FC, Amarante de Araujo P, Franco EB, Mondelli RF. Wear resistance of packable resin composites after simulated toothbrushing test. J Esthet Restor Dent 16(5) :303-314, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2004.tb00058.x
  29. van Dijiken JW, Ruyter IE. Surface characteristics of posterior composites after polishing and toothbrushing. Acta Odonto Scandia 45:337-346, 1984
  30. van Dijiken JW, Stadigh J, Meurman JH. Appearance of finished and unfinished composite surface after toothbrushing. A scanning electron microscopy study. Acta Odonto Scandia 41: 377-383, 1983 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016358309162350
  31. Margio L, Rizzi M, La Torre G. 3-D surface profile analysis: different finishing methods for resin composites. Oper Dent 26: 562-568, 2001
  32. Jung M, Voit S, Klinek J. Surface geometry of three packable and one hybrid composite after finishing. Oper Dent 28:53-59, 2003
  33. Bertrand MF, Leforestier E, Muller M, Lupi-Pegurier L, Bolla M. Effect of surface penetrating sealant on surface texture and microhardness of composite resins. J Biomed Mater Res 53:658-663, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4636(2000)53:6<658::AID-JBM7>3.0.CO;2-O
  34. De Wet FA, Ferreira MR. The durability of dental glazes. J Prosthe Dent 44:300-306, 1980 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(80)90016-5