DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Researching Science Learning Outside the Classroom

  • Dillon, Justin (Centre for Informal Learning and Schools, King's College London)
  • Published : 2007.10.31

Abstract

Although science continues to be a key subject in the education of the majority of young people throughout the world, it is becoming increasingly clear that school science is failing to win the hearts and minds of many of today's younger generation. Researchers have begun to look at ways in which the learning that takes place in museums, science centres and other informal settings can add value to science learning in schools. Four case studies are used to illustrate the potential afforded by informal contexts to research aspects of science learning. The case studies involve: the European Union PENCIL (Permanent European Resource Centre for Informal Learning) project (a network of 14 museums and science centres working with schools to enhance learning in maths and science); a large natural history museum in England; the Tate Modernart gallery in London, and the Outdoor Classroom Action Research Project which involved researchers working in school grounds, field centres and farms. The range of research questions that were asked are examined as are the methodological approaches taken and the methods used to collect and analyse data. Lessons learned from the studies about research in the informal contexts are discussed critically.

Keywords

References

  1. Department for Education and Skills (DfES) (2006). Learning Outside the Classroom Manifesto (available at: http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/teachingan dleaming/resourcematerials/outsideclassrooml) Accessed on December 3, 2006
  2. Dillon, J., McCallie, E., & Botranger, V. (2005). Learning to engage. A review of face-to-face learning experiences at the London Natural History Museum's Darwin Centre. Unpublished report
  3. Dillon, J., Morris, M., O'Donnell, L., Reid, A., Rickinson, M. & Scott, W. (2005). Engaging and learning with the outdoors - the final report of the Outdoor Classroom in a Rural Context Action Research Project. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research
  4. Dillon, J., Rickinson, M., Sanders, D., Teamey, K., & Benefield, P. (2003). Improving the understanding of food, Farming and land management amongst school-agechildren: a literature review (DfES Research Report 422). London: DfES
  5. Falk, J.H., Brooks, P., & Amin, R. (2001) Investigating the role of free-choice science learning on public understanding of science: The California Science Center L.A.S.E.R. Project.In J.H. Falk (Ed.), Free-choice science education: How we learn science outside of school (pp.93-114). New York: Teachers College Press
  6. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
  7. Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons. Education And Skills Committee (2005). Education Outside the Classroom. Second Report of Session 2004-05. Report, Together with Formal Minutes, Oral and Written Evidence (HC 120). London: The Stationery Office
  8. Office For Standards In Education (2004). Outdoor Education: Aspects of Good Practice (HMI 2151) [online]. Available: http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/ publications/index.cfm ?fuseaction=pubs.displayfile&i d=37l9&type=pdf [28 April, 2005]
  9. Scott, W., Reid, A., & Jones, N. (2004). Growing Schools: the Innovation Fund Projects (2000 -2003): an external evaluation [ online]. Available: http://www.teachernet.gov .uk/_doc/565 5/030923 %20 GS%20IF%20Final%20Report.doc [28 April, 2005]
  10. Schreiner, C., & Sjoberg, S. (2007). Science education and youth's identity construction - two incompatible projects? In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon & R. Gunstone (Eds) The Re-emergence of values in the science curriculum, (pp.23 1-247). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers
  11. Schutz, A. (1976). The stranger. In G. Bowker, & J. Carrier (Eds) Race and ethnic relations. London: Hutchison