한국환경과학회지 (Journal of Environmental Science International)

  • 제16권4호
  • /
  • Pages.409-414
  • /
  • 2007
  • /
  • 1225-4517(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-3503(eISSN)
한국환경과학회 (The Korean Environmental Sciences Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

보리 종자의 α-아밀라아제 활성에 미치는 Dimethipin의 영향

Effects of Dimethipin on α-amylase Activity of Barley Seeds

  • 이준상 (충북대학교 과학교육학부)
  • Lee, Joon-Sang (Department of Biological Education, School of Science Education, College of Education, Chungbuk National University)
  • 발행 : 2007.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Effects of dimethipin on ${\alpha}$-amylase activity of barley seeds were investigated. In the treatments of $1{\mu}M\;and\;10{\mu}M$ dimethipin, the indexes of germination were reduced to 17% and 24 % respectively. After seed germination, dimethipin was added to germinated seedlings and then the seedlings were kept to measure seedling length under illumination for 7 days. In control, the length of seedling was 5.7 cm, but in the treatments of $1{\mu}M$ dimethipin and $10{\mu}M$ dimethipin, seedling lengths were 5.5 cm and 1.2 cm respectively. In the relationship between dimethipin concentrations and ${\alpha}$-amylase activities, there was a linear curve. The more dimethipin was added to the seeds, the more ${\alpha}$-amylase activities were inhibited. In the treatments of $1{\mu}M$ dimethipin and $10{\mu}M$ dimethipin, ${\alpha}$-amylase activities were reduced to 33% and 71% respectively. Dimethipin also inhibited ${\alpha}$-amylase activities increased by gibberellin and the content of soluble protein. Therefore, it could be suggested that dimethipin might inhibit directly the activities of hydrolysis enzymes including ${\alpha}$-amylase or the expression of ${\alpha}$-amylase genes as germination and seedling growth were severely disturbed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Taiz L, Zeiger E, 2003, Plant physiology, The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co., California USA 690pp
  2. Ames R. B., Blem A. R., Pryzbylek J. M., Walz A. W., Jaction D, 1982, Dirnethipin: A unique plant maturity regulator for rice and sunflower, Proc. Crop Protection Cof., 2, 563-568
  3. Morgan P. W., 1984, Is ethylene the natural regulator of abscission? In: Ethylene: Biochemical, Physiological and Applied Aspects. Fuchs Y. and E. Chaluitz (ED), Martinus Nijhoff, Hague, 231-140pp
  4. Zacarius L., Reid M. S., 1990, Role of growth regulators in the scenscence of Arabidopsis thaliana leaves, Physiol. Plant, 80, 549-554 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1990.tb05677.x
  5. Burg S. P., Burg E. A, 1965, Relationship between ethylene production in apples, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 45, 335-344
  6. Keng J. P., Metzer J. D., 1984, Modification of -dirnethipin action by light, Plant Growth Regul., 3, 141-156 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02041999
  7. Hoagland R. E., 1984, Dimethipin effects on soybean seedings growth and metabolism, Plant Cell Physiol., 25(3), 397-405
  8. Varner J. E., Chandra G. R., 1964, Hormonal control of enzyme synthesis in barley endosperm, proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 52, 100-106
  9. Perata P., Matsukura C., Vernieri P., Yamaguchi J, 1997, Sugar repression of a gibberellindependent signaling pathway in barley embryos, Plant Cell, 9, 2197-2208 https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.9.12.2197
  10. Yokoyama R., Hirose T., Fujii N., Aspuria E. T., Kato A., Uchimiya H., 1994, The rol C promoter of Agrobacterium rhizogenes Ri plasmid is activated by sucrose in transgenic tobacco plants, Mol. Gen. Genet., 244, 15-22 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00280182
  11. Jefferson R., Goldsbrough A., Bevan M., 1990, Transcriptional regulation of patatin-1 gene in potato, Plant Mol. Biol., 14, 995-1006 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00015650
  12. Loreti E., Alpi A, Perata P., 2000, glucose and disaccharide-sensing mechanisms modulate the expression of a-amylase in Barley embryos, Plant Physiol., 123, 939-948 https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.123.3.939
  13. Chen M. H., Huang L. F., Li H. M., Chen Y. R., Yu S. M., 2004, Signal peptide-dependent targeting of a rice a-amylase and cargo proteins to plastids and extracellular compartments of plant cells, Plant Physiol., 135, 1367-1377 https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.104.042184
  14. Abeles F. B., Morgan P. W., Saltveit M. E., 1992, Ethylene in plant physiology, 2nd ed. Academic Press, Sandiago
  15. Ritchie S., McCubbin A., Genevieve A., Kao T. H., Gilroy S., 1999, The sensitivity of barley aleurone tissue to gibberellin is heterogeneous and may be spatially determined, Plant Physiol., 120, 361-370 https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.120.2.361
  16. Paleg L. G., Coombe B. G., Buttrose M. S., 1962, Physiological effects of gebberellic acid, Plant Physiol., 37, 798-803 https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.37.6.798
  17. Jun B. O., Koh S. C., Kwon Y. M., 1983, Canavanine effects on the amylase activity and protein content in barley half seed, Kor. J, Bot., 26, 173-180
  18. Lowry O. B., Rosebrough N. J., Farr A. L., Randell R. J., 1951, Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagents, J, Biol. Chem., 113, 265-275
  19. Higgins T. J, V., Zwar J, A., Jacobsen]. V., 1976, Gibberellic acid enhances the level of translatable mRNA for a-amylase in barley aleurone layers, Nature, 260, 166-169 https://doi.org/10.1038/260166a0