Quantitative Analysis of Phosphinothricin-N-acetyltransferase in Genetically Modified Herbicide Tolerant Pepper by an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay

  • Shim, Youn-Young (Saskatoon Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Cannada) ;
  • Shin, Weon-Sun (Department of Food & Nutrition, Hanyang University) ;
  • Moon, Gi-Seong (Division of Food & Biotechnology, Chungju National University) ;
  • Kim, Kyung-Hwan (National Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology, Rural Development Administration)
  • Published : 2007.04.30

Abstract

An immunoassay method was developed to quantitatively detect phosphinothricin-N-acetyltransferase (PAT) encoded by the Bialaphos resistance (bar) gene in genetically modified (GM) pepper. The histidine-tagged PAT was overexpressed in Escherichia coli M15 (pQE3l-bar) and efficiently purified by $Ni^{2+}$ affinity chromatography. A developed sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (S-ELISA) method (detection limit: $0.01{\mu}g/ml$) was 100-fold more sensitive than a competitive indirect ELISA (CI-ELISA) method or Western blot analysis in detecting the recombinant PAT. In real sample tests, PAT in genetically modified herbicide-tolerant (GMHT) peppers was successfully quantified [$4.9{\pm}0.4{\mu}g/g$ of sample (n=6)] by the S-ELISA method. The S-ELISA method developed here could be applied to other GMHT crops and vegetables producing PAT.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahmed, F. E. 2002. Detection of genetically modified organisms in foods. Trends Biotechnol. 20: 215-223 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7799(01)01920-5
  2. James, C. 2004. Preview: Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops, ISAAA Briefs, No. 32, ISAAA, New York
  3. Kalogianni, D., P. Zhang, T. Zhang, T. K. Christopoulos, and P. C. Ioannou. 2006. Nanoparticle-based DNA biosensor for visual detection of genetically modified organisms. Biosens. Bioelectron. 21: 1069-1076 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2005.04.016
  4. Kim, J H., H. S. Song, D. H. Kim, and H. Y. Kim. 2006. Quantification of genetically modified canola GT73 using TaqMan real-time PCR. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 16: 1778-1783
  5. Kim, Y. H., S. J. Choi, H. A. Lee, and T. W. Moon. 2006. Quantification of CP4 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase in soybean by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 16: 25-31
  6. Kwak, B. Y., S. H. Ko, W. S. Shin, and D. H. Shon. 2003. Analysis of genetically-modified soybean and soybean sprout by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 35: 556-560
  7. Lee, S. H., H. J. Park, S. H. Cho, H. K. Chun, D. H. Kim, T. H. Ruy, and M. C. Cho. 2004. Comparison of major nutrients and mineral contents in genetically modified herbicide-tolerant red pepper and its parental cultivars. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 13: 830-833
  8. Lee, Y. H., S. B. Lee, S. C. Suh, M. O. Byun, and H. I. Kim. 2000. Herbicide resistant cabbage plants by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. J. Plant Biotechnol. 2: 35-41
  9. Lipp, M., E. Anklam, and J. W. Stave. 2000. Validation of an immunoassay for detection and quantitation of a genetically modified soybean in food and food fractions using reference materials: Interlaboratory study. J. AOAC Int. 83: 919-927
  10. McKenzie M. J., V. Mett, and P. E. Jameson. 2000. Modified ELISA for the detection of neomycin phosphotransferase II in transformed plant species. Plant Cell Rep. 9: 286-289
  11. Rudi, K., I. Rud, and A. Holck. 2003. A novel multiplex quantitative DNA array based PCR (MQDA-PCR) for quantification of transgenic maize in food and feed. Nucleic Acids Res. 31: e62
  12. Shim, Y. Y., D. H. Shon, B. Y. Kwak, J. H. Yu, and K. M. Chee. 2004. Comparison of properties of polyc1onal anti-N-acetylchitooligosaccharides and anti-chitooligosaccharides antibodies produced for ELISA. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 14: 686-692
  13. Song, H. S., J. W. Kim, D. H. Kim, and H. Y. Kim. 2007. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of genetically modified pepper. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. (in press)
  14. Stave, J. W. 2002. Protein immunoassay methods for detection of biotech crops: Applications, limits, and practical considerations. J. AOAC Int. 85: 780-786