Production and Pricing of Digital News

디지털 뉴스의 생산 및 가격 전략에 관한 연구

  • Published : 2007.12.31

Abstract

Most traditional newspaper publishers provide online editions to counter the competition of online news providers. However, the relationship between the online and print editions of the same newspaper has not been clearly defined. Some see the online newspaper as a substitute, while others consider it a complement. A 2002 NAA online newspaper consumer survey indicated that one-third of its respondents said they were now using the print newspaper less. Others have argued that the online edition will not wipe out print consumption, and may even complement it. While the print edition offers particular advantages such as portability, less eye strain, and the tactile experience of a printed page, the online edition also offers specific advantages such as access to breaking news, continually updated information, access to old archives, etc. All these factors would tend to lower the degree of interchangeability between the products. However, recent empirical studies show that the online edition is a substitute for rather than a complement of the print edition. Still, to some print readers, the online edition provides additional value. In this paper, by capturing the two different aspects of online editions the substitute aspect and the additional value added aspect as well as other available online alternatives, we develop an analytical model to derive the optimal production and distribution strategies of both online and print editions. Confronting the "free versus fee" issue, we show that it is optimal to provide an online version of the print newspaper for free to non-print subscribers. However, the amount of free news content that the publishers need to put on the Web depends on the available alternatives on the online market. The "fee" and "free" options both have merits and demerits as well. If the publisher charges for the online version of the print newspaper, she can generate revenue from the fee charged to online readers. However, doing so will limit the size of the online audience and further reduce online advertising revenue. At the same time, by providing a high-quality online version and charging for it, the price of the print newspaper must stay low in order to lure high valued readers. On the contrary, if the publisher provides an online version of the print newspaper for free, she can obtain a larger audience for the online version. At the same time, by providing a low-quality online newspaper, the publisher can increase the print newspaper price to get more revenue from high valued offline readers, although no revenue is incoming from online version readers. Through systematic measuring of all the pros and cons, our analysis shows that the optimal option is not "fee" but "free."

Keywords

References

  1. Angwin, J. and Hallinan, J.T. Newspaper Circulation Continues Decline, Forcing Tough Decisions. The Wall Street Journal Online, May 2, 2005
  2. Blair, R.D. and Romano, R.E. Pricing Deci- sions of the Newspaper Monopolist. Southern Economic Journal, 59, 1993, pp. 723-732
  3. Cameron, G.T., Hollander, B.A., Nowak, G.J. and Shamp, S.A. Assessing The Poten- tial of a Full-featured Electronic News- paper for the Young Adult Market. Media Management Review, 1996, pp. 15-28
  4. Chaudhri, V. Pricing and Efficiency of a Circulation Industry: The Case of Newspapers. Information Economics and Policy, 10, 1998, pp. 59-76 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6245(97)00030-9
  5. Depken, C.A. and Wilson, D.P. Is Adver- btising a Good or a Bad? Evidence from U.S. Magazine Subscriptions. The Journal of Business, Vol. 77, No. 2, 2004, S61 https://doi.org/10.1086/381519
  6. Filistrucchi, L. The Impact of the Internet on the Market for Daily Newspapers in Italy. Mimeo, EUI, 2004
  7. Gallaugher, J.M., Auger, P., BarNir, A. Revenue Streams and Digital Content. Providers: An Empirical Investigation. Infor- mation & Management, Vol. 38, No. 7, 2001, pp. 473-485
  8. Gentzkow, M. Valuing New Goods in a Model with Complementarity: Online News- paper. Mimeo, Harvard University, 2004
  9. Outing, S. E-newspaper Business Models for Attracting Younger Readers. "Stop the Presses" column, 1996
  10. Rosse, J. N. The Decline of Direct Newspaper Competition. Journal of Competition, Vol. 30, 1980, pp. 65-71
  11. Schlosser, A.E., Shavitt, S. and Kanfer, A. Survey of Internet Users' Attitudes toward Internet Advertising. Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 13, No. 3, 1999, pp. 34-54 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6653(199922)13:3<34::AID-DIR3>3.0.CO;2-R
  12. Seelye, K. Can Papers End the Free Ride Online? The New York Times, March 14, 2005
  13. Sonnac, N. Readers' Attitudes toward Press Advertising: Are They Ad-lovers or Ad-averse? The Journal of Media Economics, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2000, pp. 249-259 https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327736ME1304_4