DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

CGMMV Tolerance Test of CGMMV-CP Trangenic Watermelon Rootstock and Establishment of Transgenic Line

CGMMV-CP 형질전환 수박대목의 CGMMV 내성시험 및 계통확보

  • 박상미 ((주)농우바이오 생명공학연구소) ;
  • 권정희 ((주)농우바이오 생명공학연구소) ;
  • 임미영 ((주)농우바이오 생명공학연구소) ;
  • 신윤섭 ((주)농우바이오 생명공학연구소) ;
  • 허남한 ((주)농우바이오 생명공학연구소) ;
  • 이장하 ((주)농우바이오 생명공학연구소) ;
  • 류기현 (서울여자대학교 환경생명과학과) ;
  • 한지학 ((주)농우바이오 생명공학연구소)
  • Published : 2007.03.31

Abstract

Previously developed transgenic watermelon rootstocks (gongdae) inserted by CGMMV-CP were examined to test the virus tolerance levels. In the restricted plastic house, the $T_{3}$ watermelon rootstock showed tolerance to CGMMV until 70 days after inoculation on the leaves while the non-transformed watermelon rootstock became susceptible at 20 days after inoculation. In the field, tolerance efficiency of transgenic rootstocks maintained up to 40% at 71 days after contamination with CGMMV in the soil while all of the non-transformed rootstocks became susceptible at 37 days with the same condition. In the same field, transgenic rootstocks showed more tolerance to CGMMV than the non-transformed rootstocks as those were inoculated on the leaves, but it showed only 10 days delay before being susceptible. Therefore, transgenic rootstocks have a characteristic of delay effect against CGMMV susceptibility, rather than resistance character. From $T_{3}$ rootstocks homozygous for the CGMMV-CP horticulturally favorable individuals were selected for further breeding and a transgenic line was finally obtained at the $BC_{1}T_{5}$. A material transfer experiment was conducted to find out if the DNA, RNA or expressed protein in the transgenic rootstocks could move to the grafted scion (non-transformed watermelon, Super-Kumcheon). PCR, northern, and western blot analysis were performed and no evidence of transferring of those materials from rootstock to scion was ever found.

수박작물의 대목용으로 사용하는 수박공대에 CGiMMV-CP 유전자를 도입하여 개발된 LM 수박공대의 CGMMV 내성 정도를 격리하우스와 노지 포장내에서 조사하였다. 격리온실에서의 $T_{3}$ 형질전환 수박대목의 CGMMV 내성은 접종 후 70일까지 유지되는 반면 대조구는 접종 후 20일에 전부 이병되었다. 인위적 토양전염 포장에서 형질전환체는 접종후71일까지 약 40%의 내성률을 보였으며, 대조구는 접종 후 37일에 모두 이병되었다. 인위적 접촉전염 포장에서 형질전환체는 대조구에 비해 약 10일 정도 지연효과를 보였다. 따라서 CGMMV-CP 형질전환체는 CGMMV에 저항성을 가진 것이 아니라 감염시기를 지연시키는 부분 내성으로 나타났다. CGMMV-CP homozygous T 세대를 진전시켜서 형질전환 수박공대 계통을 $BC_{1}T_{5}$ 세대에서 선발하였다. 또한 LM 수박공대에 형질전환 되지 않은 접수 (슈퍼금천수박)를 접목하여 non-LM 수박을 생산하고 CGMMV-CP 유전자에 관련된 물질의 이동 여부를 조사하였다. PCR, northern, western 분석한 결과 수박공대 대목에서 형성되는 DNA, RNA, protein 물질이 접수로 이동되지 않음을 확인하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Amit GO, Dalia W, Yehezkel A, Larisa P, Ryu KH, Byoung EM, Malenia P, Oded L, Victor G, Yongzeng W, Yoel MS, Jee Y, Aaron Z (2005) Transgenic cucumbers harboring the 54-kDa putative gene of cucumber fruit mottle mosaic tobamovirus are highly resistant to viral infection and protect non-transgenic scions from soil infection. Trans Res 14: 81-93 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-004-3802-7
  2. Bau HJ, Cheng YH, Yu TA, Yang JS, Yeh SD (2003) Broad-spectrum resistance to different geographic strains of papaya ringspot virus in coat protein gene transgenic papaya. Virology 93: 112-120
  3. Choi GS (2001) Occurrence of two tobamovirus diseases on cucurbits and control measures in Korea. Plant Pathol J 17: 243-248
  4. Choi GS, Kim JH, Kim JS (2004) Soil transmission of cucumber green mottle mosaic virus and its control measures in watermelon. Res Plant Dis 10(1): 44-47 https://doi.org/10.5423/RPD.2004.10.1.044
  5. Chomczynski P, Saccni N. (1987) Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem 162(1): 156-9
  6. Dellaporta SL, Wood J, Hicks JB (1983) A simple and rapid method for plant DNA preparation. Version II Plant Mol Biol Rep 1: 19-21 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02712670
  7. Fuchs M, Klas FE, Mcferson JR, Gonsalves D (1998) Transgenic melon and squash expressing coat protein genes of aphid-borne viruses do not assist the spread of an aphid non-transmissible strain of cucumber mosaic virus in the field. Trans Res 7: 449-462 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008828500686
  8. Gaba V, Zelcer A, Gal-On A (2004) Cucurbit biotechnology the importance of virus resistance. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 40: 346-358 https://doi.org/10.1079/IVP2004554
  9. Ko SJ, Lee YH, Lee TS, Yang KY, Park JW, Choi HS (2004) Influence of CGMMV infection times on growth and quality of watermelon and cucumber. Res Plant Dis 10(1): 48-52 https://doi.org/10.5423/RPD.2004.10.1.048
  10. Kaniewski W, Lawson C, Sammons B, Haley L, Hart J, Delannay X, Tumer NE (1990) Field resistance of transgenic russet burbank potato to effects of infection by potato virus X and potato virus Y. Bio/Technol 8: 750-754 https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0890-750
  11. Lee KY (1996) Current occurrence and control of CGMMV 'Konjak' disease. Plant Dis Agric 2: 38-39
  12. Lee KY, Lee BC, Park HC (1990) Occurrence of cucumber green mottle mosaic virus disease of watermelon in Korea. Kor J Plant Pathol 6: 250-255
  13. Park SM, Lee JS, Jegal S, Jeon BY, Jung M, Park YS, Han SL, Shin YS, Her NH, Lee JH, Lee MY, Ryu KH, Yang SG, Harn CH (2005) Transgenic watermelon rootstock resistant to CGMMV (cucumber green mottle mosaic virus) infection. Plant Cell Rep 24: 350-356 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-005-0946-8
  14. Sinisterra XH, Polston JE, Abouzid AM, Hiebert E (1999) Tobacco plants transformed with modified coat protein of tomato mottle begomovirus show resistance to virus infection. Virology 89(8): 701-706
  15. Sohn SH, Kim KH, Park JS, Hqang DJ, Hahn JH, Lee KW, Hwang YS (1997) Virus-resistance analysis in transgenic tobacco expressing coat protein gene of cucumber mosaic virus. Kor J Plant Tiss Cult 24(3): 153-160
  16. Xu Y, Kang D, Shi Z, Shen H, Wehner T (2004) Inheritance of resistance to zycchini yellow mosaic virus and watermelon mosaic virus in watermelon. J Heredity 95(6): 498-502 https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esh076

Cited by

  1. Detection of gene flow from GM to non-GM watermelon in a field trial vol.51, pp.1, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03030744
  2. A framework for molecular genetic assessment of a transgenic watermelon rootstock line vol.176, pp.6, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.03.007
  3. Evaluating the Persistence of DNA from Decomposing Transgenic Watermelon Tissues in the Field vol.53, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12374-010-9121-z