Evaluation of the criteria to distinguish heifer from cow of Holstein cattle in abattoir

축산물 작업장에서 젖소 미경산 및 경산우 구별을 위한 비교 항목 평가

  • Kim, Kyoung-Ho (Incheon Metropolitan City Institute of Health & Environment) ;
  • Lee, Jung-Goo (Incheon Metropolitan City Institute of Health & Environment) ;
  • Ra, Do-Kyung (Incheon Metropolitan City Institute of Health & Environment) ;
  • Kim, Cheol-Wan (Livestock Health Control Association) ;
  • Byun, Jae-Won (National Veterinary Research and Quarantine Service, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry) ;
  • Lee, Sung-Mo (Incheon Metropolitan City Institute of Health & Environment)
  • 김경호 (인천광역시보건환경연구원) ;
  • 이정구 (인천광역시보건환경연구원) ;
  • 라도경 (인천광역시보건환경연구원) ;
  • 김철완 (가축위생방역지원본부) ;
  • 변재원 (국립수의과학검역원) ;
  • 이성모 (인천광역시보건환경연구원)
  • Published : 2007.03.30

Abstract

In Korea, it is the one of controversial problems to distinguish heifer from cow in slaughtered Holstein cattle. This study was conducted to evaluate the several criterions which could be used to discriminate heifer from cow. Some criterions have shown significant differences between heifer and cow in ante and post-mortem inspections(p<0.01). Firstly, the numbers of milk teeth of heifer and cow were $6.12{\pm}1.92$ ($Mean{\pm}Standard$ deviation) and $0.03{\pm}0.39$ respectively. The teat diameter(D) and length(L) of cow were $26.43{\pm}4.31mm$ and $47.76{\pm}6.89mm$ respectively. However, those of heifer were significantly smaller (D: $18.04{\pm}5.04mm$, L: $28.61{\pm}8.91mm$) than those of cow. The size of udder was $203.68{\pm}16.84mm$ in Holstein cow and $112.70{\pm}20.59mm$ in heifer. Secondly, the uterus size of cow was significantly bigger than that of heifer and caruncle in mucosa of uterus could be easy to be confirmed by necropsy inspection. It was also obvious that the folding and length of uterus body were significantly remarkable in cow. Lastly, the pelvic cavity was $196.33{\pm}10.01mm$ in heifer and $220.90{\pm}11.41mm$ in cow. The ossifying maturation of heifer was $2.64{\pm}0.82$ and $6.71{\pm}1.81$ in cow. As the results, this study can be helpful for meat inspectors to discriminate the non-delivery heifer from delivery cow in Holstein cattle.

Keywords

References

  1. Bagnato A, Oltenacu PA. 1994. Phenotypic evaluation of fertility traits and their association with milk yield of Italian Frisian Cattle. J Dairy Sci 77 : 874-882 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77022-3
  2. Spalding RW, Evertt RW, Foote RH. 1975. Fertility in New York artificial inseminated Holstein herds in dairy herd improvement. J Dairy Sci 58 : 718-723 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(75)84633-9
  3. Butler WR, Smith RD. 1989. Interrelationships between energy balance and postpartum reproductive function in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 72 : 767-783 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79169-4
  4. Swanson LV. 1989. Discussion- interaction of nutrition and reproduction. J Dairy Sci 72 : 805-814 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79171-2
  5. Bartlett PC, Kirk JH, Wilke MA, et al. 1986. Metritis complex in Michigan Holstein-Friesian cattle : incidence, descriptive epidemiology and estimated economic impact. Prev Vet Med 4 : 235-248 https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-5877(86)90026-7
  6. Butler WR. 1998. Review: effect of protein nutrition on ovarian and uterine physiology in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 81 : 2533-2539 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)70146-8
  7. Fourichon C, Seegers H, Malher X. 2000. Effect of disease on reproduction in the dairy cow: A metanalysis. Theriogenology 53 : 1729-1759 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00311-3
  8. Goff JP, Horst RL. 1997. Physiology and management: physiological changes at parturition and their relationship to metabolic disorders. J Dairy Sci 80 : 1260-1268 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76055-7
  9. Groohn YT, Rajala-Schultz PJ. 2000. Epidemiology of reproductive performance in dairy cows. Anim Reprod Sci. 60/61 : 605-614 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00085-3
  10. 서울우유협동조합. 1996. 알기 쉬운 개량과 번식. 서울. 상명프로세스 : 56-62
  11. 농림부. 2004. 축산물등급판정세부기준, 농림부고시 제2004-66호. 과천
  12. 서울우유협동조합. 1988. 젖소 질병도감. 서울. 상명문화 : 93
  13. 正田陽一, 正木淳二, 大島正尙. 1993. 축산전서 유우. 동경. 농산어촌문화협회 : 83-92
  14. 맹원제. 1998. 젖소 돌보기. 서울. 도서출판 필방 : 53-55
  15. de Aahunta A, Habel RE. 1986. Applied veterinary Anatomy. New York. W.B. Saunders company : 11-12
  16. 趙忠鎬. 1979. 獸醫産科學. 서울. 英才敎育社 : 468-469
  17. 윤석봉. 1979. 가축비교해부학. 서울. 문운당 : 360-361