농촌계획 (Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning)

  • 제13권1호
  • /
  • Pages.97-109
  • /
  • 2007
  • /
  • 1225-8857(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-9493(eISSN)
한국농촌계획학회 (Korean Society of Rural Planning)
권호 표지

행위자연계망이론을 통한 영국 도시교외지역 관리시책의 운영과정 특성 분석 -테임즈 체이스 마을 숲 조성 시책을 사례로-

An Analysis of the Urban Fringe Management Initiative's Operational Process in UK Using the Actor Network Theory - A Case Study of Thames Chase Community Forest Initiative -

  • 김용범 (대구경북연구원) ;
  • 박재홍 (영남대학교 자연자원대학 식품산업경영학과) ;
  • 천성환 (경기대학교 국제대학 국제산업정보학과)
  • Kim, Yong-Bum (Daegu Gyeongbuk Development Institute) ;
  • Park, Jae-Hong (Dept. of Food Industry Management, Yeungnam University) ;
  • Chun, Sung-Hwan (Dept. of International Industrial Information, Kyonggi University)
  • 발행 : 2007.03.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this research was to investigate and analyse how Community Forest Initiatives as urban fringe management initiatives made alliances with a variety of interest groups, enrol them in the urban fringe management processes using the Actor Network Theory. The Thames Chase Community Forest Initiative was selected and its area of operation included a $97 km^2$ area of green-belt area in East London. It was a instrument far improving and protecting the unique characteristics of the countryside landscape from urban developments as well as evaluating the impact of forestry inclusion in land use planning in the urban fringe. It was operated through a tiered structure comprising the Thames Chase Joint Committee and the management team. They employed a variety of devices to speak with one voice to bring about an effective operation process and to secure the enrolment of a variety of interest groups in its operational processes. Of note, the initiative's actor network impacted on improvement to and management of the countryside landscape despite not owning any land itself. As a result, when urban fringe management initiatives will be launched in South Korea to achieve a more effective and efficient urban fringe management, local councillors and representatives from public and non-government bodies should be more responsive to local communities' views and needs and work more vigorously on their behalf through lobbying, seeking media support, and so on. Moreover, better understanding and communication between local authorities' officers and management initiatives' teams are essential to avoid duplication of work practice.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bishop, K.. D., 1990. Multi-purpose Woodlands in the Countryside around Towns, unpublished PhD thesis, Reading: University of Reading
  2. Bryant, C. R., Russwurm, L. H. and McLellan, A. G., 1982. The City's Countryside, London and New York: Longman
  3. Callon, M., 1986. Some Elements of the Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and Fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay, In: Law, J. ed. Power, Action and Belief A New Sociology of Knowledge, London: Routedge, pp. 196-233
  4. Countryside Agency, 2000. Leisure Day Visits: Report of the 1998 UK Day Visits Survey, Northampton: Countryside Agency
  5. Countryside Agency, 2005, Evaluation of the Community Forest Programme, Northampton: Countryside Agency
  6. Countryside Commission, 1987. Policy for Enjoying the Countryside, Cheltenham: Countryside Commission CCP234
  7. Elson, M. J., 1995. The Effectiveness of Greenbelt, London: HMSO
  8. Foucault, M., 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, Harmondsworth: Penguin
  9. Gold, S. M., 1980. Recreation Planning and Development, New York: McGraw-Hill
  10. Kitchen, L. C., 1999. Power, Identity and Sustainable Development in the Blackdown Hills, Phd thesis, Bath: University of Bath
  11. Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C., 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, London: Verso
  12. Latour, B., 1986. The Powers of Association, In: Law, J. ed. Power, Action and Belief A New Sociology of Knowledge, London: Routedge, pp. 264-280
  13. Latour, B., 1988. The Pasteurization of France, Cambridge: Harvard university Press
  14. Latour, B., 1993. We Have Never Been Modern, Cambridge: Harvard university Press
  15. Law, J., 1986. Power, Action and Belief A New Sociology of Knowledge, London: Routedge
  16. Law, J., 1992. Notes on the Theory of the Actor-Network: Ordering, Strategy and Heterogeneity, Systems Practice, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 379-393 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059830
  17. Law, J., 1994. Organizing Modernity, Oxford: Blackwell
  18. Law, J., 1997. Traduction/Trahison: Notes on ANT, Http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/stslaw2.html. Department of Sociology, Lancaster: University of Lancaster
  19. Lowe, P. and Goyler, J., 1983. Environment Groups in Politics, London: George Allen and Unwin
  20. Lowe, P. and Ward, N., 1995. Nature and Society in Agri-Environmental Controversies: Making New Moral Discourses. Discussion Paper for the Workshop on 'The Political Economy of the Agro-Food System in Advanced Industrial Countries: New Directions.' Presented at University of California, Berkeley, September 1995
  21. Marsden, T.. Flynn, A., Lowe, P., Munton, R., Murdoch, J., 1993. Constructing the Countryside, London: UCL Press
  22. Murdoch, J., 1994. Weaving the Seamless, Web: A Consideration of Network Analysis and its Potential Application to the Study of the Rural Economy, Working Paper 3: Centre for Rural Economy Working paper Series, Newcastle upon Tyne: University Of Newcastle upon Tyne
  23. Murdoch, J., 1995. Actor-networks and the Evolution of Economic Forms, Environment Planning A, vol. 27, pp. 731-758 https://doi.org/10.1068/a270731
  24. Murdoch, J., 1997. Inhuman/nonhuman/human: Actor- network theory and the Prospects for a nondualistic and Symmetrical Perspective on Nature and Society, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 15, pp. 731-756 https://doi.org/10.1068/d150731
  25. Murdoch, J. and Marsden, T., 1994. Reconstructing Rurality, London: UCL Press
  26. Murdoch, J. and Marsden, T., 1995. The Spatialization of Politics: Local and National Actor-spaces in Environment Conflict, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, NS 20, pp. 368-380
  27. Smith, C., 1997. Community Forests-A Case Study, Quarterly Journal of Forestry, pp. 140-144
  28. Taylor, A. G., 1998. Property Rights and the Differentiating Countryside: A Study in South West England, PhD thesis, Cardiff: University of Cardiff
  29. Thames Chase Community Forest, 1993. Thames Chase Community Forest Business Plan 1993-1996, Upminster: Thames Chase Community Forest
  30. Thames Chase Community Forest, 1994. Thames Chase Community Forest Plan, Upminster: Thames Chase Community Forest
  31. Thames Chase Community Forest, 1996. Thames Chase Community Forest Business Plan 1996-1997, Upminster: Thames Chase Community Forest
  32. Thrift, N., 1996. Spatial Formations, London: Sage
  33. Tiffin, R., 1993. Community Forests: Conflicting Aims or Common Purpose?, M.Phil thesis of Bartlett School of Agriculture and Planning, London: University of College of London
  34. The Times, 2000. Prescott aims to cut urban sprawl, 08 March 2000, p. 4
  35. Travis, A. S. and Veal, A. J., 1976. Recreation and the Urban fringe, Conference Proceeding, Centre for Urban and Regional Studies, Birmingham: University of Birmingham
  36. Watson, S. K., 1992. Community Forests: Images and Reality, M.Phil. Thesis, London: University of London
  37. Whatmore, S., 1997. Dissecting the Autonomous Self: Hybrid Cartographies for a Relational Ethics, Environment Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 15, pp. 37-53 https://doi.org/10.1068/d150037