DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

복합생균제의 첨가급여가 비육돈의 생산성과 육질특성에 미치는 영향

Effect of Probiotic Supplemention on the Performance and Quality Characteristics of Meat from Finishing Pigs

  • 김희윤 (M&F 경영.기술연구소) ;
  • 김영직 (대구대학교 생명자원과학부) ;
  • 박구부 (경상대학교 동물자원과학부)
  • Kim, Hee-Yoon (M&F Management Technology Institute) ;
  • Kim, Young-Jik (Division of Life Resources, Daegu University) ;
  • Park, Gu-Boo (Division of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Gyeongsang National University)
  • 발행 : 2007.03.31

초록

본 시험은 비육돈에 대한 복합 생균제의 사료적 가치를 평가하기 위하여 시판 생균제를(0, 0.2, 0.5 및 1.0%) 삼원 교잡종($Landrace{\times}Yorkshire{\times}Duroc$, 평균체중 $55.3{\pm}1.5 kg$) 비육돈 48두를 공시하여 58일간 급여하여 증체량, 사료섭취량, 도체등급과 도체율, 육의 pH, 육색, 지방색 및 지방산 함량을 분석하였다. 일당 증체량은 0.2%구가 0.95 kg으로서 대조구(0.85 kg)에 비하여 증가(p<0.05)하였으며, 일당 사료섭취량은 대조구를 포함한 모든 처리구에서 2.79-2.84 kg로서 차이는 없었다. 사료요구율은 0.2%구가 2.96으로서 대조구(3.28)에 비하여 개선효과(p<0.05)가 뚜렷하였다. 도체중량과 도체율 및 등지방 두께는 대조구를 포함한 모든 처리구에서 차이는 없었으며 A등급 출현율은 0.2%구가 46.67%로서 타구에 비하여 향상되었다. 육의 수분, 조단백질 및 조회분 함량은 대조구를 포함한 모든 처리구에서 차이는 없었지만 조지방 함량은 0.2%구가 다른 처리구에 비하여 낮은 경향이었다. 육의 pH는 대조구를 포함한 모든 처리구에서 차이는 없었다. 생균제를 첨가함으로서 육색의 명도($L^*$)값은 낮았으며, 적색도($a^*$) 값은 높게 나타났다. 포화지방산 함량은 0.2%구와 0.5%구에서 낮았으며, 불포화지방산 함량은 생균제를 급여한 모든 처리구에서 높게 나타났다(p<0.05).

This study was conducted to determine the effects of dietary supplementation with probiotics on the growth and meat quality of finishing pigs. A total of forty eight ($Landrace{\times}Yorkshire{\times}Duroc$) pigs ($55.3{\pm}1.5 kg$ average initial body weight) were randomly assigned to four groups and fed on a diet supplemented with 0, 0.2, 0.5 or 1% probiotics for 58 days. The pigs were slaughtered at approximately 105 kg live weight. Supplementation with 0.2% probiotics significantly (p<0.05) increased daily gain compared to the control. The daily gain of pigs in the 0.2% probiotic group was 0.95 kg whereas that of the control was 0.85 kg. The average feed intake was 2.79-2.84 kg and there were no significant differences in feed intake between the control and test groups. The feed conversion of the 0.2% probiotic group was 2.96 kg whereas the control showed a feed conversion of 3.28 kg. The results of this study imply that supplementation with 0.2% probiotics may improve the feed conversion of pigs. There were significant differences in carcass weight, carcass ratio, backfat thickness, and frequency percentage of A grade carcasses between the control and probiotic test groups. In addition, the moisture, crude protein and crude ash contents of the probiotic treated groups did not differ significantly from the control group, however the crude fat values of the 0.2% probiotic test group was significantly tower than the other groups. The muscle pH levels of all samples ranged from 5.63-5.67 which is the normal pH of pork. The supplementation of probiotics resulted in decreased lightness ($L^*$) values and increased redness ($a^*$) values. Furthermore, the saturated fatty acid contents of the 0.2% and 0.5% probiotic test groups decreased and the unsaturated fatty acid contents increased relative to the control.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. AAFCO. (1986) Association of American Food Control Officials. U. S. A
  2. AOAC. (1990) Offical Methods of Analysis 16th ed. Association of Offical Analytical Chemists. Washington, D. C. pp. 931
  3. Chiang, S. H. and Hsieh, W. M. (1995) Effect of direct-fed microorgainisums on broiler growth performance and litter ammoonia level. Asian-Austral. J. Anim. Sci. 8, 159-162 https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.1995.159
  4. Deymer, D. I., and Vandekerckhove, P. (1995) Compounds determining pH in dry sausage. Meat Sci. 3, 161-165 https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(79)90033-0
  5. Dugan, M. E. R., Aalhus, J. L., Jeremiah, L. E., Kramer, J. K. G., and Schaefer, A. A. (1999) The effect of feeding conjugated linoleic acid on subsequent pork quality. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 79,45-52 https://doi.org/10.4141/A98-070
  6. Duncan, D. B. (1955) Mutiple range test. Biometric. 11, 1-6 https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478
  7. Folch, J., Lees M., and Sloane-Stanley, G. H. (1957) A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. J. Biol, Chem. 226, 497-507
  8. Fuller, R. (1977) The impotance of lactobacilli in maintaing normal microbial balance in crop. Br. Poult. Sci. 18, 85-94 https://doi.org/10.1080/00071667708416332
  9. Gilliland, S. E. (1987) Influence of bile tolerance in Lactobacilli used dietary adjunct. In Biotechnology in the Feed Industry ed. Lyons, T. P. Kentucky, USA: Alltech Feed Co. p.149-155
  10. Hale, O. M. and Newton, G. L. (1979) Effect of a nonviable lactobacillus species fermentation product on performance of pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 48, 770-775 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1979.484770x
  11. Jin, L. Z., Ho, Y. W., Abdullah, N., and Jalaludin, S. (1998) Growth performance, intestinal microbial population, and serum cholesterol of broilers fed diets containing Lactobacillus cultures. Poult. Sci. 77, 1259-1265 https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.9.1259
  12. Kim, J. H., Kim, C. H., and Ko, Y. D. (2001) Effect of dietary supplementation offermented feed on performance of finishing pigs and fecal ammonia gas emission. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 43, 193-202
  13. Newman, C. W., Eslick, R. F., Peooer, J. W., and ELNegoumy, A. M. (1980) Performance of pigs fed hulless and covered barley supplemented with or without a bacterial distase. Nutr. Rep. Int. 22, 833-841
  14. Newman, C. W., Stands, D. C., Megeed, M. E., and Newman, R. K. (1988) Replacement of soybean meal in swine diets with L-lysine and Lactobacillus fermsntum. Nut. Rep. Int. 37, 347-352
  15. NRC. (1988) Nutrient requirement of swine. National Academy Press, Washington, D. C
  16. Park, J. H., Park, H. S., Heo, S. N., Lee, S. N., and Ryu, K. S. (2005) Effect of dietary supplemental EM on growth of pig and pork quality. Bulletin of Agricultural College, Chonbuk national University. 36,103-116
  17. Park, J. H., Lim, O. C., Na, C. S., and Ryu, K. S. (2003) Effect of dietary supplementation of yeast culture on the performance, nutrient digestibility and physico-chemical characteristics of the pork in growing-finishing pigs. Kor. Anim. Sci. Technol. 45, 219-228 https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2003.45.2.219
  18. SAS. (1996) SAS/STAT software for PC. Release 6.11, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA
  19. Sedlacek, O. and Rucki, J. (1976) Presence of residue of drugs in meat and intestinal organs of calves fed on a milk mixture. VM, Med. Praga. 21,137-143
  20. Wood, J. D., Richardson, R. I., Nute, G. R., Fisher, A. V., Campo, M. M., Kasapidou, E., Sherd, P. R., and Enser, M. (2003) Effect of fatty acid on meat quality; a review. Food Sci. 66, 21-32
  21. Wu, J, F. (1987) The microbiologist's function in developing action specific microorganisms. In: T. P .. Lyons(ed). Biotechnology in the feed industry. Alletech, Inc. Nicholas vill, Kentucky. 181
  22. Yang, C. J., Hyon, J. S., Yang, C. B., Ko, S. M., and Choi, H. H. (1998) Studies on the effects of feed additives fed to pigs - Effects of feeding probiotics on the growth performance and carcass quality in pigs. Korean J. Anim. Sci. 40, 21-30
  23. Yu, D. J., Na, J. C., Kim, T. H., Kim, S. H., and Lee, S. J. (2004) Effect of supplementation of complex probiotics on performanc, physico-chemical properties of meat and intestinal micro flora in broiler. Korean J. Anim. Sci. 46, 593-602
  24. 고영두, 김재황, 김창현, 김삼철, 김영민, 하홍민(2000) 육성돈 사료에 복합 생균제의 첨가효과. 경상대학교 농자원이용연구소보 12, 65-72
  25. 김문철, 정창조, 송대곤, 김영붕(1997). 사료첨가제가 육성비육돈의 성장 및 체조성에 미치는 영향. 한국축산학회지, 41, 231-238
  26. 민태선, 한인규, 정일병, 김인배(1992) 사료내 항생제, 복합설파제, 유산동, 복합효소제, 생균제의 첨가가 돼지의 성장능력 및 도체특성에 미치는 효과. 한국영양사료 학회지, 16, 265-272
  27. 양창범, 정선부, 고서봉, 이종언, 김지훈, 조원탁, 한인규. (1997) 기능성 물질이 자돈, 육성돈 및 비육돈의 성장과 오염물질 배설량에 미치는 영향. 한국 영양사료학회지. 21, 315-321
  28. 축산물등급소식. (1998, 1999, 2000) 축산물등급판정소. 11월호

피인용 문헌

  1. Effect of Feeding Complex of Wild Chrysanthemum Powder, Probiotics and Selenium on Meat Quality in Finishing Porks vol.29, pp.1, 2009, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2009.29.1.114
  2. on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood parameters, and meat quality in finishing pigs vol.98, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2017-0126
  3. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum on noxious gas emission and carcass quality grade in finishing pigs vol.16, pp.2, 2007, https://doi.org/10.12729/jbr.2015.16.2.072