참고문헌
- 곽승준, 유승훈, 장정인. 2006. 컨조인트 분석을 이용한 한강하구의 가치추정. 경제학연구, 54(4), 141-161
- 송교육, 제윤미. 2004. 낙동강 하구역의 생태경제학적 가치평가와 보전방안에 관한 연구. 연구보고서 2004-20, 부산발전연구원
- 이창희, 강대석, 남정호, 이병국, 유혜진. 2001. 하구석호 육해전이수역 통합환경관리방안 연구. 한국해양수산개발원
- 이창희, 남정호, 김선희, 김홍상, 노백호, 문현주, 심영규, 안소은, 박창석, 이수재, 노태호, 강대석, 신용식, 최유진, 강수진, 한은진, 김재경, 한종화, 박해경. 2005. 지속가능한 하구역 관리방안 II, 경제인문사회연구회 협동연구총서 05-21-03. 한국환경정책평가연구원
- Arrow, K., R. Solow, P.R. Portney, E.E. Leamer, R. Radner, and H. Schuman. 1993. Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Federal Register, 58, 4601-4614
- Bateman, I.J. and K.E. Willis. 1999. Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford
- Bjornstad, D.J. and J.R. Kahn. 1996. The Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources: Methodological Issues and Research Needs. Edward Elgar
- Freeman III A.M. 1993. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values. Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C
- Gregory, R., S. Lichtenstein, and P. Slovic. 1993. Valuing environmental resources: a constructive approach. J. Risk Uncertainty, 7, 177-197 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065813
- Hanemann, W.M. 1984. Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. Am. J. Agr. Econ., 66, 332-341 https://doi.org/10.2307/1240800
- Hanemann, W.M., J.B. Loomis, and B.J. Kaninnen. 1991. Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Am. J. Agr. Econ., 73, 1255-1263 https://doi.org/10.2307/1242453
- Hanly, N. and C.L. Spash. 1993. Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment. Edward Elgar, Aldershot
- Jeong, J. and G.S. Maddala. 1993. A Perspective on Application of Bootstrap Methods in Econometrics. In: G.S. Maddala, C.R. Rao, and H.D. Vinod, ed., Handbook of Statistics (Econometrics), Vol. 11. North-Holland
- Keeney, R. 1992. Value-Focused Thinking. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge
- Krinsky, I. and A.L. Robb. 1986. On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. Rev. Econ. Stat., 68, 715-719 https://doi.org/10.2307/1924536
- Kristrom, B. 1997. Spike models in contingent valuation. Am. J. Agr. Econ., 79, 1013-1023 https://doi.org/10.2307/1244440
- Krupnick, A. and D. Burtraw. 1996. The social costs of electricity: do the numbers add up?. Resour. Energy Econ., 18, 423-466 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-7655(97)00023-7
- Kwak, S.-J., S.-H., Yoo, and T.-Y. Kim. 2002. A constructive approach to air-quality valuation in Korea. Ecol. Econ., 38, 327-344 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00190-2
- Mitchell, R.C. and R.T. Carson. 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C
- Russell, C.S., V. Dale, J. Lee, M. Hadley, M. Kane, and R. Gregory. 2001. Experimenting with multi-attribute utility survey methods in a multi-dimensional valuation problem. Ecol. Econ., 36, 87-108 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00207-X
- Yoo, S.-H. and K.-S. Chae. 2001. Measuring the economic benefits of the ozone pollution control policy in Seoul: results of a contingent valuation survey. Urban Stud., 38, 49-60 https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980020014802
- Yoo, S.-H. and S.-J. Kwak. 2002. Using a spike model to deal with zero response data from double bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys. Appl. Econ. Lett., 9, 929-932 https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850210139378
- Yoo, S.-H., S.-J. Kwak, and T.-Y. Kim. 2001. Modeling willingness to pay responses from dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys with zero observations. Appl. Econ., 33, 523-529 https://doi.org/10.1080/000368401300008214
피인용 문헌
- Assessment of the Environmental Value of the Geum-river Estuary vol.19, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2013.19.5.417
- Assessment of Economic Value of Youngsan River Estuary vol.44, pp.8, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2011.44.8.629
- Emergy-Based Value of the Contributions of the Youngsan River Estuary Ecosystem to the Korean Economy vol.18, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7850/jkso.2013.18.1.13
- Estimating the Attribute Values of 4 Major River Estuaries in Korea -Focusing on Testing for the IIA Assumption in MNL Model and the Alternative Models- vol.22, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.15266/KEREA.2013.22.3.521
- Measuring the economic benefits of designating Baegnyeong Island in Korea as a marine protected area vol.24, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2016.1232318
- Emergy Evaluation of the Korean Economy and Environment: Implications for the Valuation of Marine Ecosystem Services vol.18, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7846/JKOSMEE.2015.18.2.102
- Emergy Valuation of Tidal Flat Ecosystems in Korea: I. Characteristics of Environmental Emergy Inputs vol.21, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7850/jkso.2016.21.4.134