Transactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers A (대한기계학회논문집A)

The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers (대한기계학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Based on Independent Subspaces with Common Design Variables

공통설계변수를 고려한 독립적하부시스템에 의한 다분야통합최적설계

  • 신정규 (두산엔진(주) 기술연구소) ;
  • 박경진 (한양대학교 기계정보경영공학부)
  • Published : 2007.03.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Multidisciplinary design optimization based on independent subspaces (MDOIS) is a simple and practical method that can be applied to the practical engineering MDO problems. However, the current version of MDOIS does not handle the common design variables. A new version of MDOIS is proposed and named as MDOIS/2006. It is a two-level MDO method while the original MDOIS is a single-level method. At first, system analysis is performed to solve the coupling in the analysis. If the termination criteria are not satisfied, each discipline solves its own design problem. Each discipline in the lower level solves the problem with common design variables while they are constrained by equality constraints. In the upper level, the common design variables of related disciplines are determined by using the optimum sensitivity of the objective function. To validate MDOIS/2006, mathematical problem and NASA test bed problem are solved. The results are compared with those from other MDO methods. Finally, MDOIS/2006 is applied to flow patterner design and shows that it can be successfully applied to the practical engineering MDO problem.

Keywords

References

  1. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J. and Haftka, R.T., 1996, 'Multidisciplinary Aerospace Design Optimization - Survey of Recent Developments,' Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV
  2. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J., 1988, 'Optimization by Decomposition: A Step from Hierarchic to Nonhierarchic Systems,' NASA CP-3031
  3. Cramer, E.J., Dennis, J.E., Frank, P.D. Jr., Lewis, R.M. and Shubin, G.R., 1994, 'Problem Formulation for Multidisciplinary Optimization,' SIAM Journal, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 754-776 https://doi.org/10.1137/0804044
  4. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J., Agte, J. and Sandusky, R. Jr., 1998, 'Bi-level Integrated System Synthesis,' AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, St. Louis, MO
  5. Kroo, I., Altus, S., Braun, R., Gage, P. and Sobieski, I., 1994, 'Multidisciplinary Optimization Methods for Aircraft Preliminary Design,' AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Panama City Beach, FL
  6. Shin, M.K. and Park, G.J., 2005, 'Multidisciplinary Design Optimization based on Independent Subspaces,' International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 64, pp. 599-617 https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1380
  7. Lee, S.I., 2005, 'Comparison of MDO Methodologies with Mathematical Examples,' Master Dissertation, Department of Mechanical Design and Production Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea
  8. Shin, M.K., Kang, B.S. and Park, G.J., 2005, 'Application of the Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Algorithm to the Design of a Belt-Integrated Seat While Considering Crashworthiness,' Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineerings, Part D, Journal of Automobile Engineering, Vol. 219, pp. 1281-1292 https://doi.org/10.1243/095440705X34928
  9. Park, C.M., Kang, T., Shin, J.K. and Park, G.J., 2004, 'Design of a Strip Casting Roll using Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Methodology,' AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Albany, NY
  10. Arora J.S., 2004, 'Introduction to Optimum Design,' 2nd ed., Academic Press, Boston
  11. Fadel, G.M. and Cimtalay, S., 1993, 'Automatic Evaluation of Move-Limits in Structural Optimization,' Structural Optimization, Vol. 6, pp. 233-237 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01743381
  12. Thomas, H.J., Vanderplaats, G.N. and Shyy, Y.K., 1992, 'A Study of Move Limit Adjustment Strategies in the Approximation Concepts Approach to Structural Synthesis,' AIAA-1992-4750
  13. Wujek, B.A. and Renaud, J.E., 1998, 'New Adaptive Move-Limit Management Strategy for Approximate Optimization, Part 2,' AIAA Journal, Vol. 36, No. 10, pp. 1922-1934 https://doi.org/10.2514/2.287
  14. Arora, J.S. and Tseng, C.H. 1986, IDESIGN User's Manual Version 3.5, Optimal Design Laboratory, College of Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa city, Iowa 52242
  15. Dot user's manual version 5.4, Vanderplaats Research & Development, Inc., 2001
  16. http://mdob.larc.nasa.gov/mdo.test/Problems.html
  17. Lee, J.S. and Lee, K.B., 2000, 'An Experimental Study on the Control of Shock in the Hydraulic Actuator System Using the Orifice,' Transactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers (B), Vol. 24, No. 11, pp. 1506-1512
  18. Min, K.H., Yoon, J.Y. and Byun, S.J., 2001, 'Fluid Flow Control Apparatus,' Patent number 10-2001-0023120 (in Korean)
  19. Kim, Y.S. and Kim, Y.G., 2002, 'Numerical Analysis for the Pressure and Flow Fields Past a Two-Staged Conical Orifice,' Transactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers (B), Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 278-287 https://doi.org/10.3795/KSME-B.2002.26.2.278
  20. ANSYS User's manual version 9.0, ANSYS Inc., PA, USA, 2005
  21. Park, S.H., 2005, 'Design of Experiments,' Minyoung Sa. (In Korean)