Investigation on the Relationship between Land Use and Water Quality with Spatial Dimension, Reservoir Type and Shape Complexity

공간성, 호소유형 및 형태복잡도 지수를 이용한 토지이용과 호소수질의 관계 연구

  • Published : 2007.02.28

Abstract

Land use types within a watershed closely are related with the water quality characteristics of receiving water bodies. Despite of a numerous studies suggesting a strong relationship between water quality and land use, there have been increasing concerns about the geographical variation and a lack of spatial integration in that relationship, which are essential to implementing these findings into land use planning and management. In the meantime, edges mediate the material flux between adjacent systems. This mediating effect of edges is strongly related to the complexity of their shapes. Land use activities within a watershed have a direct impact on the water quality of adjacent aquatic systems, and hydrological processes carry residuals from watershed into adjacent aquatic ecosystems through the edges. Therefore, the geometry of reservoirs theoretically affects the relationship between land uses in the watershed and the quality of receiving bodies of water. In this light, this study integrates the geo-spatial dimensions of land uses in the watershed using GIS and landscape indices in order to explore the relationship between land uses and water quality. Water quality characteristics, land uses and geometry of 133 randomly sampled reservoirs were correlated, based on buffer zones and types of reservoirs. The findings showed that land uses, particularly urban land uses, significantly affect water quality characteristics including BOD, COD, TN and TP, and geometry of reservoirs reduces the concentration of pollutant and nutrients in reservoirs. One of results indicates that the relationship between land use and water quality and effects of spatial dimension may vary with types of reservoirs and pollutants. These results suggest that lakeshore areas are important, particularly for TN reduction and call for a caution to land use activities nearby shoreline areas for sustaining better water quality.

Keywords

References

  1. 김명수, 안동만(1996) 도시공원의 경관생태학적 분석-패취의 형태지수와 분산도 분석을 중심으로-. 한국조경학회지 23(4) 12-19
  2. 김호섭, 황순진(2004) 육수학적 특성에 따른 국내 저수지의 부영양화 유형분석- 옆록소 a와 수심을 중심으로- . 한국육수학회지 37(2): 213-226
  3. 서주환, 최현상, 김상범, 이철민(1999) 형태지수를 이용한 도로경관의 선호성 분석에 관한 연구 -설악산 국립공원을 대상으로- . 한국조경학회지 27(4): 87-93
  4. 서주환, 조영배, 이준근(2002) 형태지수를 이용한 농촌경관의 선호성 분석에 관한 연구 -농촌 문화마을을 대상으로-. 한국산림휴양학회지 6(2): 7-14
  5. 이도원, 장현정, 강신규(2000) 생태학적.육수학적 현상들에 대한 프랙탈의 적용. 한국육수학회지 33(2): 69-79
  6. 이영우(1995) 토지이용으로 인한 수질영향. 한국조경학회지 22(4): 198-202
  7. 이진희, 이행렬, 이재근, 이동근, 김훈희(1998) 하천에 있어서 자연성 보전, 정비, 창출에 관한 연구(I) 농촌지역에서의 토지 이용과 하천수질과의 상관성 . 한국복원녹화기술학회 1(1) : 84-94
  8. 전민우, 조용수(2004) 보청천 유역의 하천길이에 대한 프랙탈 특성. 건설기술연구소 논문집 23(1): 281-291
  9. 정광욱, 윤춘경, 장재후 김형철(2006) 유역의 토지이용과 오염원 현황이 수질특성에 미치는 영향 분석. 한국육수학회지 39(1) : 41-51
  10. 최지홍, 신은성, 이동훈(1999) 서울 도시지역의 비점오염원 유출특성에 관한 연구, 한국물환경학회지 15(3): 315-323
  11. 홍선기, 임영득, 中越信和, 장남기(2000) 한국 농산촌 경관의 구조와 이질성 및 다양성의 최근 변화: 경관의 보전과 복원과의 관계. 한국생태학회지 23(5): 359-368
  12. Anon(1982) Eutrophication of Waters: Monitoring, Assessment and Control. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
  13. Baker, A(2003) Land use and water quality. Hydrological Process 17: 2499-2501 https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5140
  14. Cadenasso, M. L. and S. T. A Pickett(2000) Linking forest edge structure to edge function: mediation of herbivore damage. Journal of Ecology 88: 31-44 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00423.x
  15. Cole, G. A (1979) Textbook of Limnology (2nd ed.). St. Louis: The C. V. Mosby Company
  16. EPA(1974) Lake Restoration. Minneapolis: US Environmental Protection Agency
  17. Forman, R. T. T.(1995) Land Mosaics: the Ecology of Landscape and Regions. New York: Cambridge University Press
  18. Liu, A. J., S. T. Y. Tong, and J. A Goodrich(2000) Land use as a mitigation strategy for the water quality impacts of global warming: a scenario analysis on two watersheds in the Ohio River Basin. Environmental Engineering and Policy 2: 65-76
  19. Marsh, W. M(2005) Landscape Planning (4th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
  20. McGarigal, K. and B. J. Marks (1995) FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattem Analysis Program for Quantifying Landscape Structure. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-351. Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station
  21. Ornernik, J. M., A R. Abernathy, and L. M. Male(1981) Stream nutrient levels and proximity of agricultural and forest land to streams: some relationships. Journal of Soil Water Conservation 36: 227-231
  22. Tong, S. T. Y. and W. Chen(2002) Modeling the relationship between land use and surface water quality. Journal of Environmental Management 66(4): 377-393 https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2002.0593
  23. Wiens, J. A. (1992) Ecological flows across landscape boundaries: a conceptual overview. In A J. Hansen and F. di Castri, eds., Landscape Boundaries: Consequences for Biotic Diversity and Ecological Flows. New York: Springer- Verlag. pp. 217-235