보건행정학회지 (Health Policy and Management)

  • 제17권1호
  • /
  • Pages.75-93
  • /
  • 2007
  • /
  • 1225-4266(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2289-0149(eISSN)
한국보건행정학회 (Korean Academy of Health Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

장기요양보호체계의 국가별 다양성

Analysis on the Diversity of Long-Term Care Systems

  • 김철주 (서울디지털대학교 사회복지학부) ;
  • 홍성대 (서울디지털대학교 사회복지학부) ;
  • 허윤정 (열린우리당 정책위원회)
  • 발행 : 2007.03.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This research purposed to analyse the diversity of the long-term care system based on the dependency/independency of the aged. For this purpose, we divided the long-term care systems to three components; form of benefit, generosity of benefit and delivery system. Form of benefit is whether the benefit is cash or in-kind, and the generosity of benefit is related to the level and coverage of benefit. The last concerned to focus on provider and user selection. According to this, we tried to make an ideal type of long-term care in the perspective of citizenship and consumerism. As a result, we established four types of long-term care system; active citizen type, passive citizen type, latent citizen type, and family dependent type. And we investigated Austria, Sweden, Germany and Korea for each type empirically.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 공적노인요양보장제도 실행위원회. 공적노인요양보장제도 실시모형 개발연구. 2001
  2. 김철주, 박보영. 새로운 사회적 위험의 도래와 복지국가의 현대화. 한국사회복지정책 2006; 24
  3. 이가옥, 우국희. 영국의 케어 제공자에 관한 정책 연구. 한국사회복지학 2005; 57
  4. 한국보건사회연구원. OECD국가의 노인장기요양서비스체계 비교와 정책적 함의.2005
  5. Baldock, John and Clare Ungerson. Becoming Consumers of Community Care, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation. 1994
  6. Cameron, C. and P. Moss. Surveying demand, supply and use of care, National Report, United Kingdom. Thomas Coram Research Unit; 2001
  7. Charles, Kerwin Kofi and Purvi Sevak. Can Family Caregiving substitute for Nursing home Care, Journal of Health Economics 2005; 24
  8. Daly, Mary and Jane Lewis. The concept of social care and the analysis of contemporary welfare state. British Journal of Sociology 2000; 51(2)
  9. Esping-Andersen, Gosta Social Foundation of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1999
  10. Geerlings, S. W., Pot, A. M., Twisk, J. W. R., Deeg, D. J. H. Predicting Transitions in the Use of Informal and Professional Care by Older Adults. Ageing and Society 2005; 25
  11. Glendinning, Caroline and Michaela Schunk, Eithne McLaughlin. Paying for Long-Term Domiciliary Care: A Comparative Perspective. Ageing and Society 1997; 17
  12. Ikegami, Naoki and John Creighton Campbell. Choices, Policy Logics and Problems In the Design of Long-term Care Systems. Social Policy and Administration 2002; 36(7)
  13. Iversen, Torben and Anne Wren. Equality, Employment, and Budgetary Restraint: The Trilema of the Service Economy. World Politics 1998; 50(4)
  14. Karlsson, Martin. Long term Care Financing in four OECD Countries : Fiscal burden and distributive effects. Health Policy, Volume 80, Issue 1, Jan. 2006
  15. Lundsgaard, Jens, Consumer Direction and Choice in Long-Term Care for Older Persons, Including Payments for Informal Care. OECD; 2005. OECD Health Working Papers No. 20
  16. Mellor, Jennifer M. Long-term Care and Nursing home Coverage. Journal of Health Economics 2001; 20
  17. Norton, Edward C. Informal Care and Health Care Use of Older Adults. Journal of Health Economics 2004; 23
  18. OECD. OECD Health Project for Tong-Term Care. 2005
  19. Ungerson, C. Social Politics and the Commodification of Care. Social Politics 1997; Fall