Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science (구강회복응용과학지)

Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion (대한턱관절교합학회)
권호 표지

Resin Bond Strength of Lithium Disilicate Glass-Ceramic by Surface Cleansing Method after Temporary Cementation

임시접착 후, 치면세마에 따른 Lithium Disilicate Glass-Ceramic의 레진결합강도에 대한 연구

  • Chung, Seung-Hwa (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Lee, Jin-Han (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Oh, Sang-Chun (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
  • 정승화 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 이진한 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 오상천 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Published : 2007.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

purpose: This study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of Lithium Disilicate Glass-Ceramic by removable method of temporary cement on the abutment tooth. Material and Method: Sixty molar teeth of human with the occlusal surface up were mounted in acrylic resin blocks. The 45 specimens were prepared to exposure dentin by diamond bur and the eugenol-containing temporary cement($Cavitec^{TM}$ ($KERR^{(R)}$, U.S.A)was applied to the dentin surfaces. After initial removal of the cement with a dental explorer, the specimens were divided into 4 groups of 15 specimens each. The dentin surfaces of the specimens were treated by rotary instrument with as follow pastes: $Zircate^{(R)}$ prophy paste(Dentsply, U.S.A), Radent Prophy Paste(Pascal company,inc. U.S.A), and Dental pumice(Wip mix corporation,U.S.A). An adhesive resin luting agent(Variolink $II^{(R)}$, Ivoclar Vivadent, Leichtenstein) including Monobond-S and $Excite^{(R)}$ was applied to all specimens. The ceramic specimens were made with an A1 ingot of IPS Empress $II^{(R)}$ (Ivoclar Vivadent, Leichtenstein). After the specimens were stored in distilled water for 48hr, the shear bond strength(MPa) was measured by a Universal testing machine(Zwick 145641, Zwick, Germany) at a 1mm/min cross-head speed. The data were statistically analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Duncan's multiple range test. Results: In all group, there were no significant differences in comparison with the control group(p>0.05). The pattern of most failure showed the mixed type of cohesive and adhesive failure. Conclusion: Resin bond strength of IPS Empress $II^{(R)}$ was not affected by removal method of the temporary cement.

Keywords

References

  1. Gwinnett AJ. smear layer. Morphological considerations. Oper Dent 1984;3:3-14
  2. Pashley DH: Clinical correlation of dentin structure and function. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:777-781 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90414-R
  3. Xavier L, David JB, Glen HJ. Retention of provisional crowns fabricated from two materials with the use of four temporary cements. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:4:469-475 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)80016-X
  4. Hansen EK, Asmussen E. Influence of temporary filling materials on effect of dentin bonding agents. Scan J Dent Res 1987;95: 516-520
  5. Taira J, Ikemoto T, Yoneya T, Hagi A, Murakami A, Makino K: Essential oil phenyl propanoids. Useful as OH scavenger. Free Radic Res Commun 1992;16:197-204 https://doi.org/10.3109/10715769209049172
  6. Baier RE. Principles of adhesion. Oper Dent 1992;5:1-9
  7. Kanakuri K, Kawamoto Y, Matsumura H. Infulence of temporary cements on bond strength between resin-based luting agent and dentin. Am J Dent 2006;19:101-105
  8. Terata R. Charaterization of enamel and dentin surface after removal of temporary cement-study on removal of temporary cement. Dent Mater J 1993;12:18-28 https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.12.18
  9. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E: Infuluence of eugenol-containing temporary cement on efficacy of dentin-bonding system. Eur J Oral Sci 1999;107:65-69 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0909-8836.1999.eos107110.x
  10. Button GL, Moon PC, Barnes RF, Gunsolley JC. Effect of preparation cleansing procedures on crown retention. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59: 145-148 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90004-2
  11. Bachmann M, Paul SJ, Luthy H, Scharer P. Effect of cleansing dentine with soap and pumice on shear bond strength of dentine- bonding agents. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:433-438 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00110.x
  12. Grasso CA, Clauori DM, Goldstein GR, Hittelman E. In vivo evaluation of three cleansing techniques for prepared abutment teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:437-441 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.128123
  13. Kanakuri K, Kawamoto Y, Matsumura H. Influence of temporary cement remnant and surface cleaning method on bond strength to dentin of a composite luting system. J oral Sci 2005;1:9-13
  14. Paul SJ, Scharer P. Effect of provisional cements on the bond strength of various adhesive bonding system on dentine. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:8-14 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00484.x
  15. Duygu Sarac, Y.Sinasi Sarac, Safak Kulunk, Tolga Kulunk. Effect of dentin cleansing techniques on dentin wetting and on the bond strength of a resin luting agent. J Prosteht Dent 2005;94:363-369 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.07.009
  16. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Influence of eugenol-containing Temporaty Cement on bonding of Self etching adhesives to dentin J Adhes Dent 2006;8:31-34
  17. Schwartz R, Davis R, Hillton TJ. Effect of temporary cements on the bond strength of a resin cement. Am J Dent 1992;5:147-150
  18. Hume WR. In vitro studies on the local pharmacodynamics, pharmacology and toxicology of eugenol and zinc oxide eugenol. Int Endod J 1988;21:130-134 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1988.tb00966.x
  19. Abo-Hamar SE, Federin M, Hiller KA, Friedl KH, Schmalz G. Effect of temporary cements on the bond strength of ceramic luted to dentin. Dent Mater 2005;21:794-803 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.01.015
  20. Y. Shimada, V. Sattabanasuk, A. Sadr, Y Yuan, HE Zhengdi, J. Tagami. Shear Bond Strength of Tooth-colored Indirect Restorations Bonded to Mid-coronal and Cervical Dentin. Dent Mater J 2006;25:7-12 https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.25.7
  21. Buonocore MA. Simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1995;34:849-853
  22. A. Dagostin, M. Ferrari. Effect of resins sealing of dentin on bond strength of ceramic restorations. Dent Mater 2002; 18:304-310 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00044-6
  23. JC Maurin, C Lagmeau, M Durand. M Lissac, D Seux. Tensile and Shear Bond Strength Evaluation a total-etch three-step and two self-etching one-step dentin bonding systems. J Adhes Dent 2006;8:27-30
  24. Paul SJ, Scharer P. The dual bonding technique: a modified method to improve adhesive luting procedures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1997;17:536-545
  25. Magne P, Douglas WH. Porce1in veneers: dentin bonding optimization and biomometic recovery of crown. Int J Prosthodnt 1999;12:111-121
  26. Ianzano J. Westbay G. Polymeric sealing of dentinal tubules to coronal sensitivity. Periodont Clin Invesig 1993;15:113-6
  27. MD. Horner JA. Dentin permeability: Sealing the dentin in crown preparation. Oper Dent 1992;17:13-20
  28. Pashley DH. Derkson GD. Tao L. Derkson M. and Kalathoor S. The effects of a multi-step dentin bonding system on dentin permeability. Dent Mater J 1988;4:60-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(88)80091-5