Various Designs of Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap for Buttock Reconstruction

둔부재건을 위한 천공지피판의 다양한 도안

  • Hong, Seung Eun (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine) ;
  • Pyon, Jai Kyong (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine)
  • 홍승은 (이화여자대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 변재경 (이화여자대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실)
  • Received : 2006.10.19
  • Published : 2007.03.10

Abstract

Purpose: The gluteal artery perforator flaps earned its popularity in buttock reconstruction due to the lower morbidity of the donor site and the flexibility in the design. Speedy and safe reconstruction is important for the success of buttock reconstruction. If a proper design is selected, satisfactory results can be obtained with more simple method of surgery. Methods: Between April 2005 and April 2006, buttock reconstruction by using gluteal artery perforator flaps were performed on sacral sores(6 cases), ischial sores(2 cases) and malignant melanoma on buttock(1 case). Various designs depending on the location and the size of the defect was made. In those designs, perforator was used as an axis for the minimal dissection of the vessel. Donor site from which sufficient amount of soft tissue can be transferred was selected, and also not causing high tension against the recipient site during the donor site closure. In addition, postoperative aesthetics, and the possibility of another design of a second operation which can be necessary in the future, was considered. Results: Patient follow up was for a mean period of 10.8 months. All flaps survived except for one that had undergone partial necrosis. Wound dehiscence was observed in one patient treated by secondary closure. Most patients presented with cosmetically and functionally satisfying results Conclusion: By designing the flap using the perforator as an axis, depending on the defect size and degree, reconstruction can be performed with only a small tension to the donor and the recipient site. And the minimal perforator dissection allowed easier and faster reconstruction. Selection of a proper design is the key procedure which greatly affects operation time and result success.

Keywords

References

  1. Minami RT, Mills R, Pardoe R: Gluteus maximus myocutaneous flap for repairs of pressure sores. Plast Reconstr Surg 60: 242, 1977
  2. Maruyama Y, Nakajima H, Wada M, Imai T, Fujino T: A gluteus maximus myocutaneous island flap for the repair of sacral decubitus ulcer. Br J Plast Surg 33: 150, 1980
  3. Parry SW, Mathes SJ: Bilateral gluteus maximus myocutaneous advancement flaps: sacral coverage for ambulatory patients. Ann Plast Surg 8: 443, 1982
  4. Coskunfirat OK, Ozgentas HE: Gluteal perforator flaps for coverage of pressure sores at various locations. Plast Reconstr Surg 113: 2012, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000122215.48226.3F
  5. Gould WL, Montero N, Cukic J, Hagerty RC, Hester TR: The split gluteus maximus musculocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 93: 330, 1994
  6. Hurteau JE, Bostwick J, Nallai F, Hester R, Jurkiewicz MJ: V-Y advancement of hamstring musculocutaneous flap for coverage of ischial pressure sores. Plast Reconstr Surg 68: 539, 1981
  7. Hwang GS, Yoo WM, Cho EJ, Tark KC, Park BY: Sacral pressure sore treatment with Gluteal perforator-based flap. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 25: 673, 1998
  8. Kim SK, Lim KR, Kim SS: Application of gluteus maximus myocutaneous flap in surgical treatment of sacral sore. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 11: 519, 1984
  9. Koshima I, Moriguchi T, Soeda S, Kawata S, Ohta S, Ikeda A: The gluteal perforator-based flap for repair of sacral pressure sores. Plast Reconstr Surg 91: 678, 1993
  10. Ao M, Mae O, Namba Y, Asagoe K: Perforator-based flap for coverage of lumbosacral defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 101: 987, 1998
  11. Kankaya Y, Ulusoy G, Oruc M, Yildiz K, Kocer U, Tuccar E: Perforating arteries of the gluteal region: anatomic study. Ann Plast Surg 56: 409, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000200775.56263.2d