Breast Reconstruction after Modified Radical Mastectomy with Becker Permanent Tissue Expander

변형 근치 유방절제술 후 Becker 확장형 보형물을 이용한 유방 재건술

  • Hong, Yong Taek (Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Yoon, Eul Sik (Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Kyu Jin (Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Dhong, Eun Sang (Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Son, Gil Soo (Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine)
  • 홍용택 (고려대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 윤을식 (고려대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 최규진 (고려대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 동은상 (고려대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 손길수 (고려대학교 의과대학 외과학교실)
  • Received : 2006.06.27
  • Published : 2007.03.10

Abstract

Purpose: Report of the good results of breast reconstruction using Becker permanent tissue expander that showed a short operation time and a quick post-operation recovery time, little side effects and usually superb aesthetic results without the need for additional incisions or donor site morbidity. The authors, after carrying out breast reconstruction operations using Becker permanent tissue expander on patients with appropriate indications, attempted to analyze several factors such as complication rates and patient satisfaction measurements. Methods: 11 cases of breast reconstruction using Becker expander implants were carried out on a total of 10 patients between March 2000 and February 2003. The patients were followed up at outpatient visit for an average of 6 months. Results: The most common post-operation complication was pain resulting from saline injection into the expanders, complained by 5 patients(50%). rib fractures, skin necrosis, implant removal due to infection, and breast cancer recurrence each occurred in 1 patient (9.9%). There was no occurrence of skin contracture complications which occurs frequently in case of silicone implant insertion. Patient complacency was surveyed by patient interviews made right after the operations and during outpatient follow-up periods: 5(50%) patients out of 10 showed excellent, 3(30%) good, and 2(20%) showed fair, leaving no patients who were disappointed with operation results. On routine follow-up, 80% of patients expressed satisfaction with the cosmetic outcome of their post-mastectomy beast reconstruction. Conclusion: Breast reconstruction using the Becker expander is a reliable alternative to other reconstructive methods but good patient selection is essential for satisfactory results.

Keywords

References

  1. Cancer incidence in Korea 1999-2001, Ministry of health and welfare, Republic of Korea, 2005
  2. Spear SL, Majidian A: Immediate breast reconstruction in two stages using textured, integrated-valve tissue expanders and breast implants; a retrospective review of 171 consecutive breast reconstruction from 1989 to 1996. Plast Reconstr Surg 101: 53, 1998
  3. Stephen JM, Mathes, Julie L: Breast Cancer: Diagnosis, Therapy, and Postrnastectomy Reconstruction. In Mathes (ed): Plastic Surgery. 2nd Ed, Philadelphia, WB. Saunders Co., 2005, p 679
  4. Tegtmeier RE: A quick, accurate mammometer. Ann Plast Surg 1: 6, 625, 1978
  5. Grossman AJ, Roudner LA: A simple means for accurate breast volume determination. Plast Reconstr Surg 66: 851, 1980
  6. Radovan C: Breast reconstruction after mastectomy using the temporary expander. Plast Reconstr Surg 69: 195, 1982
  7. Maxwell GP, Falcone PA: Eighty-four consecutive breast reconstructions using a textured silicone tissue expander. Plast Reconstr Surg 89: 1022, 1992
  8. Slavin SA, Colen SR: Sixty consecutive breast reconstructions with the inflatable expander; a critical appraisal.Plast Reconstr Surg 86: 910, 1990
  9. Kroll SS, Evans GR, Reece GP, Miller MJ, Robb G, Baldwin BJ, Schusterman MA: Comparison of resource costs between implant-based and TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 97: 364, 1996
  10. Mandrekas AD, Zambacos GJ, Katsantoni PN: Immediate and delayed breast reconstruction with permanent tissue expanders. Br J Plast Surg 48: 572, 1995
  11. Kroll SS, Baldwin BA: A comparison of outcomes using three different methods of breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 90: 455, 1992
  12. McGeorge DD, Mahdi S, Tsekouras A: Breast reconstruction with anatomical expanders and implants; our early experience. Br J Plast Surg 49: 352, 1996
  13. Gibney J: Use of permanent tissue expander for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 84: 607, 1989
  14. Robbins TH: Rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction. Aust N Z J Surg 49: 527, 1979
  15. Woods JE, Mangan MA: Breast reconstruction with tissue expanders; obtaining an optimal result. Ann Plast Surg 28:390, 1992
  16. Park BK, Ahn HC Kim JC: The free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous(TRAM) flap for immediate breast reconstruction. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 26:582, 1999